Re: [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0 2nd try

+1 2009/9/19 David Jencks > I've removed the leftover archetype scripts, fixed up the pom names so the > NOTICE files look nicer, added license goo to the script sources in the > unreleased archetype, as well as a script to remove the goo, and tried > again. I think this answers all the problem

[VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0 2nd try

I've removed the leftover archetype scripts, fixed up the pom names so the NOTICE files look nicer, added license goo to the script sources in the unreleased archetype, as well as a script to remove the goo, and tried again. I think this answers all the problems Kevan and Joe found except

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 816840

Geronimo Revision: 816840 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/unit-test

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 816816

Geronimo Revision: 816816 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/unit-test-reports

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec 1.1.2

On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: +1 I checked source, digital signature/checksums, and build. A few non-blocking issues: 1) KEYS -- I don't see your digital key in the KEYS file. Would also prefer that you sign your key with an apache.org email address, rather than yahoo

[RESULT] [VOTE] release geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec 1.1.2

Vote passes with 4 +1 votes (dwoods, djencks, jbohn, kmiller) and no other votes. I'll promote the staging repo and move the site. thanks! david jencks On Sep 15, 2009, at 1:05 PM, David Jencks wrote: After some discussion with the openjpa folks it seems like its a good idea to re-release

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0

need to fix the legal goo issues Joe and Kevan found. thanks david jencks On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: For various reasons we are now using a forked copy of tomcat derived from the tomcat 6.0.20 release, built with maven, with maven dependencies, etc etc. The code chan

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4885) Configure default max heap and max permsize

Configure default max heap and max permsize --- Key: GERONIMO-4885 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4885 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issue

With Latest G2.2 svn build (rev 816446) can't start through "gsh"

Hey, I have the G2.2 branch rev 816446 build, but can't start through gsh geronimo/start-server anymore. I confirmed and it's still working on previous builds. So it's not a system configuration problem as far as I can see. This is what I'm getting: quin...@quintin-desktop bin $ sudo ./gsh --verb

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0

Unless there's a good reason against, I'm going to be -1 until there are license headers in the following: build-archetype.sh fixup.sh mv-resource.sh mydos2unix.sh run.sh svn-actions.sh Similar non-blocking comments about the text in the jar NOTICE files and your digital signature. Everythin

Re: [discuss] update Transaction.commit method signature in jta spec jar

On Sep 17, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Lin Sun wrote: What do you think of adding the missing unchecked exception "IllegalStateException" back to our JTA spec and release a newer version of the JTA spec jar just to be the same as what is in the Java doc? I think it is good for us to be consistent with

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 816743

Geronimo Revision: 816743 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/unit-test

Re: [discuss] update Transaction.commit method signature in jta spec jar

Thanks. If there is no objection by end of Sunday, I'll start this work earlier next week. Lin On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Jack Cai wrote: > Agreed, since it won't hurt. > > -Jack > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Lin Sun wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Recently, I opened GERONIMO-4683 in G ab

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec 1.1.2

+1 I checked source, digital signature/checksums, and build. A few non- blocking issues: 1) KEYS -- I don't see your digital key in the KEYS file. Would also prefer that you sign your key with an apache.org email address, rather than yahoo. There are multiple KEYS files floating about svn an

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 816729

Geronimo Revision: 816729 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/unit-test-reports

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0

+1 ... with just one potential concern: While not officially part of the binary distribution, I did notice that the build/management scripts in the tag root source don't include the AL header. I'm never sure just how paranoid we need to be about the AL header for marginal parts like these.

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec 1.1.2

+1 ... looks good to me. Thanks David! Joe David Jencks wrote: After some discussion with the openjpa folks it seems like its a good idea to re-release our jpa 1 spec with an aritfactId of geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec rather than the original 3.0 version number. We don't really have a plan for w

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0

+1 david jencks On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: For various reasons we are now using a forked copy of tomcat derived from the tomcat 6.0.20 release, built with maven, with maven dependencies, etc etc. The code changes from tomcat 6.0.20 are: r814083 | djencks | 2009-09-1

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0

You can try removing the dependency and building to find out for sure :-) IIRC there's some slight amount of annotation processing to recognize injected ejbs and entity managers and such that uses these classes. thanks david jencks On Sep 17, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Yep, saw t

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec 1.1.2

+1 david jencks On Sep 15, 2009, at 1:05 PM, David Jencks wrote: After some discussion with the openjpa folks it seems like its a good idea to re-release our jpa 1 spec with an aritfactId of geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec rather than the original 3.0 version number. We don't really have a plan for

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4874) Improve the console filter performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12757193#action_12757193 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-4874: --- Maybe I'm not understanding this, but how

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 816617

Geronimo Revision: 816617 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/unit-test

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4603) PropertiesLoginManager is hardwired to properties-login login module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan resolved GERONIMO-4603. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.5) 3.0 Commit changes to trunkA

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 816591

Geronimo Revision: 816591 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/unit-test-reports

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4874) Improve the console filter performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jack Cai updated GERONIMO-4874: --- Attachment: GERONIMO-4874_0918.patch I did build 2.1 branch with the patch. Everything passed, inc

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4222) Database pool unusable after database unavailable for awhile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jack Cai reassigned GERONIMO-4222: -- Assignee: Jack Cai > Database pool unusable after database unavailable for awhile >

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-593) "tptp.runtime-TPTP-4.6.0.zip " download URL is incorrect in build.xml

"tptp.runtime-TPTP-4.6.0.zip " download URL is incorrect in build.xml - Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-593 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-593 Project: Geronimo-Dev

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4884) Using the default port number may cause unexpected build failure

Using the default port number may cause unexpected build failure Key: GERONIMO-4884 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4884 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4884) Using the default port number may cause unexpected build failure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4884: -- Attachment: fix_unittest.patch > Using the default port number may cause unexpected build failure >

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4875) "edit" button shows under "Created" label when i create a new view

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4875: -- Attachment: fix_view_layout.patch The missing info is not supported in 2.2, so just remove this 2 co

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 816495

Geronimo Revision: 816495 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/unit-test