[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 816495

Geronimo Revision: 816495 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/unit-test

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4875) edit button shows under Created label when i create a new view

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4875: -- Attachment: fix_view_layout.patch The missing info is not supported in 2.2, so just remove this 2

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4884) Using the default port number may cause unexpected build failure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Siqi Du updated GERONIMO-4884: -- Attachment: fix_unittest.patch Using the default port number may cause unexpected build failure

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4884) Using the default port number may cause unexpected build failure

Using the default port number may cause unexpected build failure Key: GERONIMO-4884 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4884 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug

[jira] Created: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-593) tptp.runtime-TPTP-4.6.0.zip download URL is incorrect in build.xml

tptp.runtime-TPTP-4.6.0.zip download URL is incorrect in build.xml - Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-593 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-593 Project:

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4222) Database pool unusable after database unavailable for awhile

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jack Cai reassigned GERONIMO-4222: -- Assignee: Jack Cai Database pool unusable after database unavailable for awhile

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4874) Improve the console filter performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jack Cai updated GERONIMO-4874: --- Attachment: GERONIMO-4874_0918.patch I did build 2.1 branch with the patch. Everything passed,

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 816591

Geronimo Revision: 816591 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/unit-test-reports

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-4603) PropertiesLoginManager is hardwired to properties-login login module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ivan resolved GERONIMO-4603. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1.5) 3.0 Commit changes to

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 816617

Geronimo Revision: 816617 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/unit-test

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4874) Improve the console filter performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12757193#action_12757193 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-4874: --- Maybe I'm not understanding this, but how

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec 1.1.2

+1 david jencks On Sep 15, 2009, at 1:05 PM, David Jencks wrote: After some discussion with the openjpa folks it seems like its a good idea to re-release our jpa 1 spec with an aritfactId of geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec rather than the original 3.0 version number. We don't really have a plan

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0

You can try removing the dependency and building to find out for sure :-) IIRC there's some slight amount of annotation processing to recognize injected ejbs and entity managers and such that uses these classes. thanks david jencks On Sep 17, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Yep, saw

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec 1.1.2

+1 ... looks good to me. Thanks David! Joe David Jencks wrote: After some discussion with the openjpa folks it seems like its a good idea to re-release our jpa 1 spec with an aritfactId of geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec rather than the original 3.0 version number. We don't really have a plan for

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0

+1 ... with just one potential concern: While not officially part of the binary distribution, I did notice that the build/management scripts in the tag root source don't include the AL header. I'm never sure just how paranoid we need to be about the AL header for marginal parts like these.

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 816729

Geronimo Revision: 816729 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/unit-test-reports

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec 1.1.2

+1 I checked source, digital signature/checksums, and build. A few non- blocking issues: 1) KEYS -- I don't see your digital key in the KEYS file. Would also prefer that you sign your key with an apache.org email address, rather than yahoo. There are multiple KEYS files floating about svn

Re: [discuss] update Transaction.commit method signature in jta spec jar

Thanks. If there is no objection by end of Sunday, I'll start this work earlier next week. Lin On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Jack Cai greensi...@gmail.com wrote: Agreed, since it won't hurt. -Jack On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Lin Sun linsun@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Recently, I

Re: [discuss] update Transaction.commit method signature in jta spec jar

On Sep 17, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Lin Sun wrote: What do you think of adding the missing unchecked exception IllegalStateException back to our JTA spec and release a newer version of the JTA spec jar just to be the same as what is in the Java doc? I think it is good for us to be consistent with

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0

Unless there's a good reason against, I'm going to be -1 until there are license headers in the following: build-archetype.sh fixup.sh mv-resource.sh mydos2unix.sh run.sh svn-actions.sh Similar non-blocking comments about the text in the jar NOTICE files and your digital signature.

With Latest G2.2 svn build (rev 816446) can't start through gsh

Hey, I have the G2.2 branch rev 816446 build, but can't start through gsh geronimo/start-server anymore. I confirmed and it's still working on previous builds. So it's not a system configuration problem as far as I can see. This is what I'm getting: quin...@quintin-desktop bin $ sudo ./gsh

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0

need to fix the legal goo issues Joe and Kevan found. thanks david jencks On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:31 PM, David Jencks wrote: For various reasons we are now using a forked copy of tomcat derived from the tomcat 6.0.20 release, built with maven, with maven dependencies, etc etc. The code

[RESULT] [VOTE] release geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec 1.1.2

Vote passes with 4 +1 votes (dwoods, djencks, jbohn, kmiller) and no other votes. I'll promote the staging repo and move the site. thanks! david jencks On Sep 15, 2009, at 1:05 PM, David Jencks wrote: After some discussion with the openjpa folks it seems like its a good idea to

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jpa_1.0_spec 1.1.2

On Sep 18, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: +1 I checked source, digital signature/checksums, and build. A few non-blocking issues: 1) KEYS -- I don't see your digital key in the KEYS file. Would also prefer that you sign your key with an apache.org email address, rather than

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 816816

Geronimo Revision: 816816 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20090918/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 816840

Geronimo Revision: 816840 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090918/unit-test

[VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0 2nd try

I've removed the leftover archetype scripts, fixed up the pom names so the NOTICE files look nicer, added license goo to the script sources in the unreleased archetype, as well as a script to remove the goo, and tried again. I think this answers all the problems Kevan and Joe found except

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo's forked mavenized tomcat 6.0.20.0 2nd try

+1 2009/9/19 David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com I've removed the leftover archetype scripts, fixed up the pom names so the NOTICE files look nicer, added license goo to the script sources in the unreleased archetype, as well as a script to remove the goo, and tried again. I think this