[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5172) ImageDownload.java bug in writing to buffer in 'Accessing JDBC in Web applications' tutorial page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12842211#action_12842211 ] Ashish Jain commented on GERONIMO-5172: --- You seem to be correct. Do you see an abn

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 919690

Geronimo Revision: 919690 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100305/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100305/unit-test

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 919679

Geronimo Revision: 919679 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100305/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100305/unit-test-reports

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5174) System bundle exports JAX-WS packages with wrong version

System bundle exports JAX-WS packages with wrong version Key: GERONIMO-5174 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5174 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Sub-task Securi

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 919576

Geronimo Revision: 919576 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100305/build-1500.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100305/unit-test

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 919536

Geronimo Revision: 919536 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100305/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100305/unit-test-reports

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5173) activation spec unit tests fail when compiled with java 6.

activation spec unit tests fail when compiled with java 6. --- Key: GERONIMO-5173 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5173 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Secur

JRE included spec packages and unit testing.

I was doing a little work on the activation spec package today, and I ran into a puzzling problem. Once I got my changes to compile and build correctly, I started getting unit test failures. And I was getting very strange results while trying to debug the failures...it didn't appear that my u

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5172) ImageDownload.java bug in writing to buffer in 'Accessing JDBC in Web applications' tutorial page

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Oberg updated GERONIMO-5172: -- Description: The 'Accessing JDBC in Web applications' page in the tutorial contains a bug in

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5172) ImageDownload.java bug in writing to buffer in 'Accessing JDBC in Web applications' tutorial page

ImageDownload.java bug in writing to buffer in 'Accessing JDBC in Web applications' tutorial page - Key: GERONIMO-5172 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERON

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 919423

Geronimo Revision: 919423 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100305/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100305/unit-test

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release GEP more frequently

+1 on adding a forth digit, while maintaining existing 1.1-2.2 server support in the same GEP 2.2.x.x build, along with some wiki updates explaining which versions should be used for given server/Eclipse combinations. -Donald On 3/5/10 3:30 AM, Delos wrote: > Hi, > > Hopefully, we can make a de

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release GEP more frequently

daition-3 wrote: > > Johannes suggested that GEP make release more frequently. The reason is > user > may get new fixes earlier, instead of waiting for next release together > with > Geronimo server. In this way, it will be more convenient for GEP to > provide > new improvement, such as support

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5156) Command line utility to unlock a keystore and private key

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Jain updated GERONIMO-5156: -- Attachment: 5156_one_line_of_code.patch Ivan/Shawn, I am uploading a slightly modified patch

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 919390

Geronimo Revision: 919390 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100305/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100305/unit-test-reports

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release GEP more frequently

Delos, +1 for your proposal. -Jack On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Delos wrote: > Hi, > > Hopefully, we can make a decision on this.-:) > > 2010/3/4 Delos > > Thanks for your comments! Seems no objection for more frequent releases >> till now, but there still some advices about implementation

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-5145) Address getGbean method in KernelDelegate as pointed out by GERONIMO-4844

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Shawn Jiang closed GERONIMO-5145. - Resolution: Fixed Committed at revision: 919353 to 21 branch based on the patch from Ashish.

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 919327

Geronimo Revision: 919327 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100305/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100305/unit-test

Re: [DISCUSSION] Release GEP more frequently

Hi, Hopefully, we can make a decision on this.-:) 2010/3/4 Delos > Thanks for your comments! Seems no objection for more frequent releases > till now, but there still some advices about implementation details.Here are > my answers to some of your questions. > > *1) (Kevan) I will note that thi

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5145) Address getGbean method in KernelDelegate as pointed out by GERONIMO-4844

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ashish Jain updated GERONIMO-5145: -- Attachment: 5145.patch Shawn, Here is the patch for 2.1 branch. Kindly review and apply. >