[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-614?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-614:
---
Assignee: Tim McConnell
> Support free (not open-source) Aries tool
2010/4/22 David Jencks
> OK.
>
> I would be a lot happier moving to jaxb objects for this. How much work do
> you think it would be to use jaxb for web.xml? I'd think the major problem
> would be in the naming builders. I wonder if we could put some default jaxb
> <> xmlbeans conversion method
Thanks, Ashish!
Hope more people can review this RC.
2010/4/22 Ashish Jain
> Build went fine, project imports went fine, able to start/stop server,
> tested couple of apps with IBM Java5/Java6 with eclipse galileo sr2. My +1.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Delos wrote:
>
>> mvn eclipse
Before we have a final resolution for the cache/respository, I am thinking
that we could use reference:file protocol for the appclient, as those cache
folders are only used once.
2010/4/22 Jarek Gawor
> Yeah, I'll take a look.
>
> Jarek
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM, David Jencks
> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859564#action_12859564
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5092:
rev 936536 uses priority on service bea
I think I've done everything I want to for now with yoko as far as getting it
running in osgi. It would be great if someone wanted to review it, otherwise I
think its time to start trying to release it.
BTW, we're going to have problems with osgi and milestones, since e.g. 3.0.M1
is after 3.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859544#action_12859544
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5091:
rev 936530. Give the BundleProviderLoa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859516#action_12859516
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5213:
---
Updated the scripts (and geronimo-maven-p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859497#action_12859497
]
Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5262:
---
Made a tons of updates to the testsuites
Ivan, thanks for you advice. I have created a JIRA(
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5265) and uploaded a patch.
Kindly provide your comments.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Ivan wrote:
> It seems a good idea, but I think that "all the children" should be the
> children which ar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ashish Jain updated GERONIMO-5265:
--
Attachment: 5265_21.patch
> Modify the redeploy behavior to start all the running childs alo
Modify the redeploy behavior to start all the running childs along with the
parent
--
Key: GERONIMO-5265
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5265
Project:
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> Rick,
>> I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency
>> issues. For example:
>>
>> ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be
>> geronimo
These problems are serious enough to require a retry on this. I'll
start the rollback process and get new candidates ready as soon as I can.
Rick
On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Rick,
I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency
issues. For example:
ejb
On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Rick,
I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency
issues. For example:
ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be
geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1.
jaxb 2.2 has a dependency on geronimo-activati
Rick,
I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency
issues. For example:
ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be
geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1.
jaxb 2.2 has a dependency on geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.3 not
geronimo-activation_1
Build went fine, project imports went fine, able to start/stop server,
tested couple of apps with IBM Java5/Java6 with eclipse galileo sr2. My +1.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Delos wrote:
> mvn eclipse:eclipse is not in need.
>
> If you have build it successfully, then just import it into y
Yeah, I'll take a look.
Jarek
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Running the tck uses enormous amounts of disk space. I ran a segment of the
> tck on an external disk with enough room to complete and then ran
>
> du -k -d5 | sort -n -r >`pwd`/du.sort
>
> resulting in
>
> 9
Running the tck uses enormous amounts of disk space. I ran a segment of the
tck on an external disk with enough room to complete and then ran
du -k -d5 | sort -n -r >`pwd`/du.sort
resulting in
93098988.
92980992./target
92890460./target/geronimo-jetty-cts-3.0-SNAPSHOT
OK.
I would be a lot happier moving to jaxb objects for this. How much work do you
think it would be to use jaxb for web.xml? I'd think the major problem would
be in the naming builders. I wonder if we could put some default jaxb <>
xmlbeans conversion methods in the AbstractNamingBuilder an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12859405#action_12859405
]
Donald Woods commented on GERONIMO-5259:
Did you create your patch against the l
Another tag to cleanup -
geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0.1
-Donald
On 4/19/10 6:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> A little confused here
>>
>> For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
>> jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
>>
>> Looking
OK, as long as the old tag is removed, I'm good.
-Donald
On 4/19/10 6:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> A little confused here
>>
>> For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant
>> jpa_2.0_spec-1.2.
>>
>> Looking at the tags, I s
It seems a good idea, but I think that "all the children" should be the
children which are in the running state before the deployment.
2010/4/21 Ashish Jain
> Hi All,
>
> The current behavior of redeploy is to set the state of all the childs in
> the stop state and parent in the running state o
Hi All,
The current behavior of redeploy is to set the state of all the childs in
the stop state and parent in the running state on success.
One can go ahead and manually start all the childs. This may be fine if your
deployment is on one single machine. However in a
scenario in which there are
26 matches
Mail list logo
