[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 937572

Geronimo Revision: 937572 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423/build-2100.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423/unit-test

Re: osgi finder method to xbean?

That sounds a great idea to me! Lin On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:20 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Jarek has written a bunch of useful looking osgi utility type stuff currently > in geronimo-kernel. At least one of the classes, BundleAnnotationFinder, > could be quite useful to other projects, so it m

osgi finder method to xbean?

Jarek has written a bunch of useful looking osgi utility type stuff currently in geronimo-kernel. At least one of the classes, BundleAnnotationFinder, could be quite useful to other projects, so it might be a good idea to move it to xbean-finder. However, it uses many of the other classes. So

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5270) Enforce Java1.6 for Geronimo 3.0 build in maven and perhaps enforce the required maven version as well (2.2.1?).

Enforce Java1.6 for Geronimo 3.0 build in maven and perhaps enforce the required maven version as well (2.2.1?). - Key: GERONIMO-5270 URL: https://iss

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 937472

Geronimo Revision: 937472 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423 [INFO] BUILD

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)

+1 Looks good to me. I built the specs, checked rat, etc... included them (and the aries artifacts up for vote) in a Geronimo 3.0 server image and was able to deploy and run the Aries Blog & AriesTrader samples. Joe On 4/22/10 8:07 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: To support the upcoming Geronimo

[VOTE] Release OpenJPA-2.0.0 Plugins for Geronimo 2.2-2.2.1 servers

I've created a release candidate of a set of plugins that can be used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.2 or 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0 release, so users can start experimenting with a JPA 2.0 certified codebase. You can install the plugins by using the console

[VOTE] Release OpenJPA-2.0.0 Plugins for Geronimo 2.1.3-2.1.5 servers

I've created a release candidate of a set of plugins that can be used to upgrade an existing Geronimo 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.1.5 or 2.1.6-SNAPSHOT server from OpenJPA 1.x to the new OpenJPA 2.0.0 release, so users can start experimenting with a JPA 2.0 certified codebase. You can install the plugins by u

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (attempt THREE)

Believe these are okay after second look. +1 -Donald On 4/22/10 3:43 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > Here are 3 scripts to help checkout, rat:check and build the > tags in the vote. > > Can we ignore the following rat:check failures? > > geronimo-servlet_3.0_spec-1.0 - > src/main/resources/javax

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5253) Expose java:app/AppName and java:module/ModuleName in JNDI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860358#action_12860358 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5253: --- Added tests to testsuite for injecting ja

[VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release

To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the newly created bundles components. This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have been converted into OSGi jars. This is a single vote for all of the converted dependencies required for the Geronimo

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

+1 Looks good. -Donald On 4/22/10 10:38 PM, David Jencks wrote: > Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB > and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading > related code changes from previous yoko releases. > > Staging repo: > > ht

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5113) Add naming builder support for processing DataSourceDefinition annotations.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5113?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860324#action_12860324 ] Jarek Gawor commented on GERONIMO-5113: --- Added a testsuite test case for @DataSour

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-5269) ContainerBase.addChild: start: LifecycleException: java.io.IOException: Context did not start for an unknown reason

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Kevan Miller closed GERONIMO-5269. -- Resolution: Duplicate oops. > ContainerBase.addChild: start: LifecycleException: java.io.I

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5269) ContainerBase.addChild: start: LifecycleException: java.io.IOException: Context did not start for an unknown reason

ContainerBase.addChild: start: LifecycleException: java.io.IOException: Context did not start for an unknown reason Key: GERONIMO-5269 URL: https

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

+1 ran RAT and IANAL and built from source. RAT is giving a some failures, but the failures are either missing copyrights in NOTICES.vm and LEGAL.vm files or in the source files that are directly generated from the idl files. I don't think either problem is serious enough to require a redo,

File permissions of /www/geronimo.apache.org/

Jason, I assume you're the owner of some script that is extracting and copying geronimo/site/trunk/docs/ from svn over to /www/geronimo.apache.org/ every hour+5 mins? If so, can you fix it, so the files have g+w set? Other choice, would be to have infra setup svnpubsub for those files in svn over

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5268) Context did not start for an unknown reason -- does not help identify the true cause of a deployment failure

Context did not start for an unknown reason -- does not help identify the true cause of a deployment failure Key: GERONIMO-5268 URL: https://issues.apache

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 937280

Geronimo Revision: 937280 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423/build-0900.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423 [INFO] BUILD

Re: Items we need to complete for the M1 release

On 4/23/2010 10:35 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: One more SNAPSHOT that may be missing from the #2 list below: geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec - what are the plans for this? We're using a snapshot in trunk but I don't see it included in the current set of specs up for vote. The concurrent stuff is a bit

Re: Items we need to complete for the M1 release

One more SNAPSHOT that may be missing from the #2 list below: geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec - what are the plans for this? We're using a snapshot in trunk but I don't see it included in the current set of specs up for vote. Joe On 4/22/10 2:17 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: Ok, I've put together

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5259) Annoying "access denied" security exceptions for oenwebbeans while java2 security is enabled.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods updated GERONIMO-5259: --- Affects Version/s: 3.0 (was: 2.2) Patch Info: [Patch

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-5259) Annoying "access denied" security exceptions for oenwebbeans while java2 security is enabled.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods resolved GERONIMO-5259. Fix Version/s: 3.0 Resolution: Fixed Committed as r937297. Published updated 1.1-

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-5259) Annoying "access denied" security exceptions for oenwebbeans while java2 security is enabled.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Donald Woods reassigned GERONIMO-5259: -- Assignee: Donald Woods > Annoying "access denied" security exceptions for oenwebbean

Re: Items we need to complete for the M1 release

On 4/22/10 9:17 PM, chi runhua wrote: Any documents that we plan to announce together with M1 release, for example, how to build the Tomcat assembly, how to deploy Aries Blog sample application, a brief introduction of how Geronimo is integrated with OSGi Framework or any other topics? if so, we

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 937168

Geronimo Revision: 937168 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100423 [INFO] BUILD

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.5 RC1

Besides, we also get +1 from Ashish and Forrest, thanks! 2010/4/23 Delos > GEP RC1 passed the voting with following result > 0: no > +1: Donald, Kevan,Ivan > -1: no > > The release process will proceed. Thank you! > > > 2010/4/23 Forrest Xia > > +1 >> >> Did some testing on this RC1 with eclips

Re: Items we need to complete for the M1 release

On Apr 22, 2010, at 11:17 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > Ok, I've put together a set of items that need to be completed for the M1 > release. Here are the items I'm aware of: > > Ok, the following things need to be done: > > 1) Get the specs released (up for vote now) > 2) Release the various Gero

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5005) uddi osgi integration

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12860155#action_12860155 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-5005: rev 937169 uses latest released juddi.