[jira] Updated: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-615) Implement deploy, redeploy, and un-deploy of OSGi spec-compliant artifacts to Geronimo server:

2010-04-29 Thread Tim McConnell (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tim McConnell updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-615: --- Assignee: Tim McConnell > Implement deploy, redeploy, and un-deploy

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 939534

2010-04-29 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 939534 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100429/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100429 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 939510

2010-04-29 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 939510 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100429/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100429/unit-test-reports

RE: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.2

2010-04-29 Thread Colin MacNaughton
+1 -Original Message- From: David Jencks [mailto:david_jen...@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:05 PM To: d...@activemq.apache.org Cc: Geronimo Dev List (JIRA) Subject: [VOTE] Apache ActiveMQ 5.3.2 Hi, I've staged a release candidate for ActiveMQ 5.3.2. The main driver for this

Creating blog entries

2010-04-29 Thread David Blevins
The basic process I've been using for the blog posts I create is: 1. set the blog post to publish in say 2-3 days (or later if I create a handful of posts all at once which is frequently the case). 2. send a preview URL to the list for lazy consensus. POST DATE When creating a blog entry

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 939463

2010-04-29 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 939463 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100429/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100429 [INFO] BUILD

Geronimo Blog

2010-04-29 Thread Joe Bohn
Did you know that we have a Geronimo Blog? Well, we do. Kevan created it a few months back and authorized those people that expressed interest at the time. That included me but I didn't even think about it again until yesterday when I discovered that nobody had yet posted at all. So ... I ha

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenJPA-2.0.0 Plugins for Geronimo 2.2-2.2.1 servers

2010-04-29 Thread Joe Bohn
I guess I don't have an issue with the presence of the SNAPSHOT aliases (at least not enough to stop the vote). I still have to finish verification of the content but since you have enough votes you can go ahead without me. Joe On 4/29/10 11:52 AM, Donald Woods wrote: Still have questions

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 939397

2010-04-29 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 939397 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100429/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100429/unit-test-reports

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release (second attempt)

2010-04-29 Thread Rick McGuire
My +1 too On 4/28/2010 8:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the newly created bundles components. This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have been converted into OSGi jars. This is a single vote for all of

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Bundles components for the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release (second attempt)

2010-04-29 Thread Donald Woods
+1 Donald On 4/28/10 8:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to the > newly created bundles components. > This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have > been converted into OSGi jars. > This is a single vote for

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5279) search-plugins, install-library deploy command fails with NoClassDefFoundError

2010-04-29 Thread Jarek Gawor (JIRA)
search-plugins, install-library deploy command fails with NoClassDefFoundError -- Key: GERONIMO-5279 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5279 Project: Geronimo

Re: site problems

2010-04-29 Thread Joe Bohn
OK, I think I have the site stuff working again. I had a mistake with the initial version which resulted in 2 banners (what you will see if you look now) .. but on the next rsync the second banner should be removed. I only updated the site template ... I suspect some of the other templates fo

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenJPA-2.0.0 Plugins for Geronimo 2.2-2.2.1 servers

2010-04-29 Thread Donald Woods
Still have questions/concerns? I plan on removing those extra alias entries in the next release, which will probably be in a couple weeks after we get a OpenJPA 2.0.1 out. -Donald On 4/28/10 9:58 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: > I don't see the same "big" issue with SNAPSHOT artifacts in this plugin > th

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 939301

2010-04-29 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 939301 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100429/build-0900.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100429/unit-test

Re: site problems

2010-04-29 Thread Kevan Miller
On Apr 29, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: > On 4/29/10 8:26 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> http://geronimo.apache.org/ is not correct -- there are problems in the >> left-hand column. I'm guessing that it has been caused by the recent >> confluence changes. Anybody able to look at this? >> >> -

Re: site problems

2010-04-29 Thread Joe Bohn
On 4/29/10 8:26 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: http://geronimo.apache.org/ is not correct -- there are problems in the left-hand column. I'm guessing that it has been caused by the recent confluence changes. Anybody able to look at this? --kevan I'm looking into it. It seems that there are some te

site problems

2010-04-29 Thread Kevan Miller
http://geronimo.apache.org/ is not correct -- there are problems in the left-hand column. I'm guessing that it has been caused by the recent confluence changes. Anybody able to look at this? --kevan

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 939281

2010-04-29 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 939281 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100429/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100429/unit-test-reports

Re: What happened to the geronimo-boilerplate?

2010-04-29 Thread Rick McGuire
On 4/29/2010 7:17 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: In the 2.x releases, there is a geronimo-boilerplate config that contains the information used to construct the legal files for the Geronimo assemblies. This does not appear to exist in the 3.0 trunk, which I think is probably going to be an issue with

What happened to the geronimo-boilerplate?

2010-04-29 Thread Rick McGuire
In the 2.x releases, there is a geronimo-boilerplate config that contains the information used to construct the legal files for the Geronimo assemblies. This does not appear to exist in the 3.0 trunk, which I think is probably going to be an issue with getting 3.0 ready for an M1 release becau

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 939218

2010-04-29 Thread gawor
Geronimo Revision: 939218 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100429/build-0300.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100429/unit-test