Geronimo Revision: 946531 built with tests included
See the full build-0200.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100520/build-0200.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100520/unit-test-reports
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12869466#action_12869466
]
LiWenQin commented on GERONIMO-5323:
Kan Ogawa,
I see.
Thanks.
> Chinese and Japa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12869451#action_12869451
]
Kan Ogawa commented on GERONIMO-5323:
-
LiWenQin,
I had a talk about your reported i
Geronimo Revision: 946503 built with tests included
See the full build-2100.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100519/build-2100.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100519/unit-test
Yes, there is already a JIRA opened for Axis2 in the past by someone, but
...
2010/5/19 Kevan Miller
> Have we had a conversation with the axis community regarding the
> split-package issue?
>
> Minor point: I note the license/notice files in the jar have different line
> endings (mix of unix an
Cancle this vote ...
2010/5/19 Kevan Miller
> Have we had a conversation with the axis community regarding the
> split-package issue?
>
> Minor point: I note the license/notice files in the jar have different line
> endings (mix of unix and windows line endings). Would prefer that we avoid
> thi
+1
On May 17, 2010, at 6:30 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Please vote for the geronimo openejb 3.1.3.0 release
>
> This is a version of openejb based on revision r942249. This is a special
> release to be used on the Geronimo 3.0-M1 release and is being released under
> the org.apache.geronimo.ex
Geronimo Revision: 946479 built with tests included
See the full build-2000.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100519/build-2000.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100519/unit-test-reports
It does not look like the patch has been applied. You'd have to
comment on it and push for a solution if you want it to be included
somehow.
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 23:34, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Btw, I was referring to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2197. I thought parts of
> the pa
Btw, I was referring to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2197. I thought parts of
the patch were applied to Felix but I guess I was wrong.
Jarek
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> FWIW, I would think #3 is a good option, but I don't think Felix has
> anything to
On May 19, 2010, at 5:12 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 19, 2010, at 4:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On May 19, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>>
Good summary Lin.
In the OpenJPA community, we've be
FWIW, I would think #3 is a good option, but I don't think Felix has
anything to support that (but I may be wrong).
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 04:41, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was looking into getting the runtime JPA entity enhancement for OSGi
> applications working in Geronimo. With some
On May 19, 2010, at 1:41 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2010, at 4:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 19, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>>
>>> Good summary Lin.
>>>
>>> In the OpenJPA community, we've been telling users for awhile now not to
>>> use the runtime enhance
On 5/19/10 4:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Good summary Lin.
>>
>> In the OpenJPA community, we've been telling users for awhile now not to
>> use the runtime enhancement, as it has known deficiencies, and should
>> only be used for quick p
Looks like there were really only 4 services files that had rat:check
failures, even though it gave a count of 867.
So, here's my +1.
-Donald
On 5/19/10 4:28 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Do we need to publish everything? I was able to build the source, but
> there were some rat:check failures in
On May 19, 2010, at 4:28 PM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On May 19, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>
>> Good summary Lin.
>>
>> In the OpenJPA community, we've been telling users for awhile now not to
>> use the runtime enhancement, as it has known deficiencies, and should
>> only be used f
On May 19, 2010, at 4:16 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Good summary Lin.
>
> In the OpenJPA community, we've been telling users for awhile now not to
> use the runtime enhancement, as it has known deficiencies, and should
> only be used for quick prototyping and never in production.
>
> If we need
On May 19, 2010, at 1:16 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> Good summary Lin.
>
> In the OpenJPA community, we've been telling users for awhile now not to
> use the runtime enhancement, as it has known deficiencies, and should
> only be used for quick prototyping and never in production.
What are these
Do we need to publish everything? I was able to build the source, but
there were some rat:check failures in some modules (like container)...
-Donald
On 5/17/10 9:30 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> Please vote for the geronimo openejb 3.1.3.0 release
>
> This is a version of openejb based on revisio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12869311#action_12869311
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4918:
I think I have everything ported to tru
Good summary Lin.
In the OpenJPA community, we've been telling users for awhile now not to
use the runtime enhancement, as it has known deficiencies, and should
only be used for quick prototyping and never in production.
If we need to continue supporting this in Geronimo (for the developer
scenar
Geronimo Revision: 946342 built with tests included
See the full build-1500.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100519/build-1500.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100519/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-5327.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
Jira is not a support forum. Please ask on the user mailing list
SSL Certificate verification
-
Key: GERONIMO-5327
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5327
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire resolved GERONIMO-5326.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 946312. and 946314.
I believe I found all the plac
Geronimo Revision: 946293 built with tests included
See the full build-1400.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100519/build-1400.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100519/unit-test-reports
Original Message
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Derby 10.6.1.0 released
Date: 19 May 2010 15:53:28 -
From: rhille...@apache.org
To: annou...@apache.org
The Apache Derby project is pleased to announce release 10.6.1.0. In
addition to introducing many new features, this release f
Ivan,
Please keep in mind when working on the web application support
(servlet 3.0, etc.) it should support two types of applications:
regular Java EE applications and OSGi web applications.
The OSGi web applications support fragment bundles. That is, the
content of a OSGi web application is looke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rick McGuire reassigned GERONIMO-5326:
--
Assignee: Rick McGuire
> Geronimo javamail does not work on non-ASCII platforms
> --
Geronimo javamail does not work on non-ASCII platforms
--
Key: GERONIMO-5326
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5326
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level:
Seems No. 3 is the right approach, given that there is no overhead on
the user side and it gives the ability to add the imports at the last
minute, before the PU is resolved.
No. 2 gives some extra work on the user side which can make the PU not portable.
Np. 4 has to be done when PU is installed
Geronimo Revision: 946169 built with tests included
See the full build-0900.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100519/build-0900.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100519/unit-test
Have we had a conversation with the axis community regarding the split-package
issue?
Minor point: I note the license/notice files in the jar have different line
endings (mix of unix and windows line endings). Would prefer that we avoid
this, but end of the day it's a minor issue...
It looks l
Geronimo Revision: 946128 built with tests included
See the full build-0800.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100519/build-0800.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100519/unit-test-reports
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-5325:
---
Attachment: screenshot-huge-blank.jpg
> iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-5325:
---
Attachment: (was: huge-blank.jpg)
> iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-5325:
---
Attachment: huge-blank.jpg
> iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-5325:
---
Description:
#1. The assemble server page is not formatting properly in 2.2.1-SNAPSHOT. Go
to ass
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12869066#action_12869066
]
Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-5163:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-5325:
---
Attachment: screenshot-debug-views.jpg
> iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12869065#action_12869065
]
Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-5325:
---
The reason of this JIRA is the same with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang updated GERONIMO-5325:
---
Attachment: screenshot-1-assembly-portlet.jpg
> iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
>
iframe causes some portlets display incorrectly
---
Key: GERONIMO-5325
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5325
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12869058#action_12869058
]
Rex Wang edited comment on GERONIMO-5163 at 5/19/10 4:45 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12869058#action_12869058
]
Rex Wang commented on GERONIMO-5163:
I fixed #2 & #3 in rev946083 @ 2.2 branch.
1#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rex Wang resolved GERONIMO-5163.
Resolution: Fixed
> Admin console assemble server problems
> ---
Geronimo Revision: 946057 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100519/build-0300.log
See the unit test reports at
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100519/unit-test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12869037#action_12869037
]
LiWenQin commented on GERONIMO-5324:
Hi,Shawn,
I have clear the browser cache(in IE,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12869028#action_12869028
]
Ivan commented on GERONIMO-5300:
The exception is caused by the split-package issue with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ivan reassigned GERONIMO-5300:
--
Assignee: Ivan
> Class not found:org/apache/axis2/jaxws/ClientConfigurationFactory
> ---
50 matches
Mail list logo
