[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5446) "ERROR [EjbModuleImpl] Module does not exist." when start MEJB module

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12888214#action_12888214 ] viola.lu commented on GERONIMO-5446: File: /openejb/branches/openejb-3.1.x/containe

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5447) Fix the testsuite

Fix the testsuite - Key: GERONIMO-5447 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5447 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular issues) Components: testsuite Affects Versi

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-5446) "ERROR [EjbModuleImpl] Module does not exist." when start MEJB module

"ERROR [EjbModuleImpl] Module does not exist." when start MEJB module - Key: GERONIMO-5446 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5446 Project: Geronimo Issue T

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-659) Automatically add OSGI tools into P2 sites when user selects "Download OSGI tools"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Delos Dai resolved GERONIMODEVTOOLS-659. Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0) Resolution: Later After investigatio

Re: Question about geronimoHome configuration in geronimo-maven-plugin

You could use optionSets to add your customized properties. 1, add optionSets to your geronimo-maven-plugin configuration org.apache.geronimo.buildsupport geronimo-maven-plugin moreMemory

Question about geronimoHome configuration in geronimo-maven-plugin

>From geronimo-maven-plugin site doc, it described that if i want to run a customized geornimo server, i can run command: mvn geronimo:start-server -DgeronimoHome=[$dir_geronimo-server] but i want to define geronimoHome in pom.xml not in command, how to configure geronimo-maven-plugin? The way be

${project.version} is a problem..

Hi, I suggest we stop using ${project.version} in 3.0's pom. This maven variable will magicly change when I create a new sub-project which has it own version. For example, When I create a new server assembly "abc" under the assemblies project, and the abc's pom has it own version 3.0.0.0:

Re: why there is a dependency of org.eclipse.osgi-3.5.1.v20090827 in M1/trunk

Thanks! Jarek. 2010/7/13 Jarek Gawor > That's Equinox OSGi framework. This dependency is located in > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo repository which is > defined in the root pom. > > Jarek > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Rex Wang wrote: > > hi, > > > > I see it in fram

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-5421) create new gogo command deploy:unlockKeystore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor resolved GERONIMO-5421. --- Fix Version/s: 3.0 Resolution: Fixed Committed the patch plus other fixes and impro

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 963917

Geronimo Revision: 963917 built with tests included See the full build-2100.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100713/build-2100.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100713 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-658) Update maven-eclipsepde-plugin to meet new requirement

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12888152#action_12888152 ] Delos Dai commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-658: commit the improvement i

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMODEVTOOLS-656) Failed to deploy aries samples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12888150#action_12888150 ] Delos Dai commented on GERONIMODEVTOOLS-656: Need to add OSGI tools a

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.6 RC1

Thanks, Donald! Hope other PMC members can take a look at this! 2010/7/13 Donald Woods > +1 Was able to build the tag on Win7 (but not Mac as with GEP 3.0.0) > and rat:check returned some hits that can be ignored (can we backport > the excludes list from trunk to ignore all of the .* Eclipse fi

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 963903

Geronimo Revision: 963903 built with tests included See the full build-2000.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100713/build-2000.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100713/unit-test-reports

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 963825

Geronimo Revision: 963825 built with tests included See the full build-1500.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100713/build-1500.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100713 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-5421) create new gogo command deploy:unlockKeystore

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jarek Gawor reassigned GERONIMO-5421: - Assignee: Jarek Gawor (was: Chi Runhua) > create new gogo command deploy:unlockKeysto

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 963796

Geronimo Revision: 963796 built with tests included See the full build-1400.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100713/build-1400.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100713/unit-test-reports

Re: why there is a dependency of org.eclipse.osgi-3.5.1.v20090827 in M1/trunk

That's Equinox OSGi framework. This dependency is located in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/servicemix/m2-repo repository which is defined in the root pom. Jarek On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Rex Wang wrote: > hi, > > I see it in framework's pom, and it blocked my build.. > But this artifact

[VOTE] Release new versions of the Geronimo bundle components

To allow the Geronimo trunk release to upgrade the some of the components used by the server, I'd like release new versions of some of the Geronimo bundle components. This components are versions of external Geronimo dependencies that have been converted into OSGi jars. This is a single vote f

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.* branch merge is already done?

Hi, Kevan: Here is the error log, now i am trying to revert local open 3.1.* to previous revisions one by one after July 7, and then build openejb , geronimo 2.2.2 to check which revision results in this error. If you can give some information, thanks in advance! 2010-07-13 22:10:15,843 INFO [s

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 963704

Geronimo Revision: 963704 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100713/build-0900.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100713 [INFO] BUILD

Re: Shared bundle repository

As ServiceMix, Aries, Felix, Karaf (and probably other Apache project that I don't know) uses bundles, this seems more logic that we create something related to osgi stuffs under Apache umbrella (for all the bundles where Apache license is applicable) So, why not creating something like --> Apache

RE: Shared bundle repository

Hi Guillaume, I think a shared repository for OSGi bundles at Apache would be great; far better to have one well-known place with lots of activity around it rather than have multiple repositories each being only partly maintained in an ad-hoc manner. Rather than have this as a sub-project of

Re: Shared bundle repository

+1 Freeman On 2010-7-13, at 下午6:05, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I guess we're not the only projects at Apache doing that, but at least we do it the same way. I wonder if we could cooperate more closely and have a common ground for releasing such bundles and making them available to others. I think h

RE: Shared bundle repository

Hmmm. You're right - this might be tricky territory; particularly as Charles mentioned concerning bundling of non-Apache-Licensed bundles. The common-ground project would need create/distribute bundles under a selection of licenses. Still, there's got to be a way! Perhaps the best home for this

Re: Shared bundle repository

I fully agree. A single point for bundles is really a great idea. Maybe we should try to get a svn repo folder just for that and allow all asf committers access there. Lars 2010/7/13 Guillaume Nodet : > I guess we're not the only projects at Apache doing that, but at least > we do it the same wa

Re: OpenEJB 3.1.* branch merge is already done?

On Jul 13, 2010, at 4:32 AM, viola lu wrote: > Hi, Kevan: > > From openejb subversion > log:http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=962759, you already > merge serveral fixes and some code from openejb trunk, all merge work is > already finished ?coz now i built openejb 3.1.3 lat

[BUILD] branches/2.2: Failed for Revision: 963680

Geronimo Revision: 963680 built with tests included See the full build-0800.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100713/build-0800.log See the unit test reports at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.2/20100713/unit-test-reports

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo Eclipse Plugin 2.1.6 RC1

+1 Was able to build the tag on Win7 (but not Mac as with GEP 3.0.0) and rat:check returned some hits that can be ignored (can we backport the excludes list from trunk to ignore all of the .* Eclipse files?) -Donald On 7/8/10 10:12 AM, Delos wrote: > Hi all, Please review and vote on the releas

Re: Shared bundle repository

Yeah, I wasn't suggesting a subproject of SMX or Geronimo. I think there are other projects like Ace, Sling, Aries that could contribute to that too. So definitely a common ground would be a good idea. I'm not sure if the board would approve a project solely for releasing third party libraries th

Shared bundle repository

I guess we're not the only projects at Apache doing that, but at least we do it the same way. I wonder if we could cooperate more closely and have a common ground for releasing such bundles and making them available to others. I think having a single point to find OSGi bundles would be a great bene

OpenEJB 3.1.* branch merge is already done?

Hi, Kevan: From openejb subversion log: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=962759, you already merge serveral fixes and some code from openejb trunk, all merge work is already finished ?coz now i built openejb 3.1.3 latest code in my local and then build geornimo 2.2.2 but server

[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 963612

Geronimo Revision: 963612 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100713/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20100713 [INFO] BUILD

[BUILD] branches/2.1: Failed for Revision: 963602

Geronimo Revision: 963602 built with tests included See the full build-0200.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100713/build-0200.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/2.1/20100713 [INFO] BUILD

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-5410) app-per-port sample does not run on G 3.0-M1 caused by an NPE

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Forrest Xia updated GERONIMO-5410: -- Attachment: app-per-port-tomcat-3.0-M1-SNAPSHOT.car > app-per-port sample does not run on G

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-5406) NoClassDefFoundError throws out when installing and starting daytrader-web-jdbc sample

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5406?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12887676#action_12887676 ] Han Hong Fang commented on GERONIMO-5406: - Hi, I use the provided car and war a