Le 8 sept. 2017 08:45, "David Blevins" a écrit :
> On Aug 30, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> +1 for going forward
>
> Note that I also totally understand Davids concerns about the public
perception about Geronimo and that people still think we talk about the
G-Server.
> To mitigate
> On Aug 30, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> +1 for going forward
>
> Note that I also totally understand Davids concerns about the public
> perception about Geronimo and that people still think we talk about the
> G-Server.
> To mitigate this problem I pushed forward with retirin
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 5:35 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> The reason I'm hesitant to look at XBean, it seems to be focused on a single
> target (which is good for a sub-project). It would start to confuse things
> to make more stuff XBean.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by single target? I’
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 7:59 PM David Blevins
wrote:
> > On Sep 4, 2017, at 4:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> >
> > So I want to pick back up at least with fault tolerance. Would anyone
> be opposed to starting up a repo on it? I'm thinking of the name
> "Safeguard" so that it would either be "or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6579:
Component/s: Config
> Support injecting Supplier
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6579:
Fix Version/s: Config_1.0
> Support injecting Supplier
> -
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6571:
Fix Version/s: Config_1.0
> Add root element to beans.xml
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament resolved GERONIMO-6576.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Implement MP Config 1.1
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6576:
Fix Version/s: Config_1.0
> Implement MP Config 1.1
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6577:
Fix Version/s: Config_1.0
> [config] injection of @ConfigProperty Provider is broken
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6566:
Fix Version/s: Config_1.0
> Implement MicroProfile Config
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
John D. Ament updated GERONIMO-6575:
Fix Version/s: Config_1.0
> Register primitives by default (using same converters)
>
> On Sep 4, 2017, at 4:56 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>
> So I want to pick back up at least with fault tolerance. Would anyone be
> opposed to starting up a repo on it? I'm thinking of the name "Safeguard" so
> that it would either be "org.apache.safeguard" or
> "org.apache.geronimo.safeguard"
+1
Le 7 sept. 2017 16:03, "John D. Ament" a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> I'm about to start the release process for MP Config Spec 1.1. Would
> anyone be opposed to starting a release vote on GConfig 1.0 tomorrow? Or
> first thing next week?
>
> John
>
Hi All,
I'm about to start the release process for MP Config Spec 1.1. Would
anyone be opposed to starting a release vote on GConfig 1.0 tomorrow? Or
first thing next week?
John
15 matches
Mail list logo
