> On Sep 4, 2017, at 4:56 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > So I want to pick back up at least with fault tolerance. Would anyone be > opposed to starting up a repo on it? I'm thinking of the name "Safeguard" so > that it would either be "org.apache.safeguard" or > "org.apache.geronimo.safeguard" as group id in maven (xbean uses the former, > config the latter).
I have a strong preference for “org.apache.safeguard" over “org.apache.geronimo.safeguard”. We have 14 years of Google search results to work against and a few million developers brains that say Geronimo is an app server. Every time we put “Geronimo” on something, it’s a strike against Hammok, Meecrowave and TomEE and any MP implementation that may want to use it but not confuse the world that “Geronimo is back". If we do want a parent package, I repeat we can use org.apache.xbean if we like. It was meant for common reusable stuff. We do not need to shackle ourselves with any self-imposed restrictions like “xbean needs to be all released at once”. That was only done out of laziness. -David
