[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geronimo Config 1.0 Release!

2017-09-17 Thread John D. Ament
The Apache Geronimo community is happy to announce the first release of Apache Geronimo Config, 1.0! This is the first release of the MicroProfile Config compatible library here at Apache, as well as being the first release of a MicroProfile component specification implementation here at Apache!

Re: [DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release

2017-09-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
works for me about the theme: do you have some idea? we can just grab a bootstrap one (just need to check the license). Staying blue sounds good to me but we can move to something else if we have a good reason. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog

Re: [DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release

2017-09-17 Thread John D. Ament
So then how does this look? If no objections, I'll send out towards the end of my day. - The Apache Geronimo community is happy to announce the first release of Apache Geronimo Config, 1.0! This is the first release of the MicroProfile Config compatible library here at Apache, as well as

Re: [DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release

2017-09-17 Thread John D. Ament
We need to get a theme together for the website. On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 3:08 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Not sure what you refer too but can have a few cycles tomorrow to help if > clarified ;). > > Le 16 sept. 2017 02:44, "John D. Ament" a

Re: [DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release

2017-09-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | JavaEE Factory

Re: [DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release

2017-09-17 Thread David Blevins
How about "MicroProfile component specification" ? "first implementation of a MicroProfile component specification here at Apache" -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On Sep 16, 2017, at 11:06 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > >

Re: [DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release

2017-09-17 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
"MP specific specification"? MP 1.0 not being anything special (just referencing EE without bringing more consistency or features) it can work and be less ambiguous than "subcomponent" which means not much to me, wdyt? Le 17 sept. 2017 05:05, "David Blevins" a écrit : >