Re: Group specs by compiler version

Id prefer by enclosing profile version if we can or ee/mp version but no strong opposition to do it by java version. Le jeu. 17 mai 2018 00:05, Raymond Auge a écrit : > Would people be opposed to grouping the specs in the reactor by the > version of java they need to be compiled with? > > Maybe

Group specs by compiler version

Would people be opposed to grouping the specs in the reactor by the version of java they need to be compiled with? Maybe I could add jvm build profiles? -- *Raymond Augé* (@rotty3000) Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.*

[no subject]

-- Daniel "soro" Cunha https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: Mp opentracing?

requested the repo: https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-opentracing.git Have fun ;) BTW, do we want to include opentracing in the repo as well - I think so since mp spec does pretty much nothing otherwise. My idea was to start by firing a CDI even with the thing to log and if no observ

Re: Eliminating osgi locator shade

Fine with me as well! On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 4:31 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > We can scope it for >= java 6 specs if that's the only blocker we hit. > This is perfectly fine IMHO. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

Re: Eliminating osgi locator shade

We can scope it for >= java 6 specs if that's the only blocker we hit. This is perfectly fine IMHO. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github

Re: Eliminating osgi locator shade

It’s been a really long time since I looked at any of this and I might not remember accurately or understand the scope of what you propose to do IIRC there were a few specs that predate ServiceLoader and use something similar but incompatible that the locator takes care of. So, you might ha

Eliminating osgi locator shade

Hello All, Romain mentioned in another thread about wanting to eliminate the osgi locator shade. I would be super happy to make this happen. This can be accomplished by leveraging the Service Loader Mediator. However there is a caveat. In order to stick with the Service Mediator spec, the code in

Re: Next releases?

jwt-auth and jcache-simple vote sent, will try to add the proxying feature this afternoon in config Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github

[VOTE] Release JWT Auth 1.0.0

Hi guys, I'd like to release geronimo-jwt-auth 1.0.0 as mentionned in another mail The dist (dev) area is available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jwt-auth/ (rev 26951) The staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1056/ For the dura

[VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.0

Hi guys, I'd like to release geronimo-jcache-simple 1.0.0 as mentionned in another mail The dist (dev) area is available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/jcache/ (rev 26950) The staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1055/ For the d