f course. Thanks Gurkan.
>>
>> If needed, lemme know I can help on this
>> --
>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:29 PM Gurkan Erdogdu
>> wrote:
>>
Hi folks
Regarding TomEE, we need to add Java EE Security, JSR-375 spec to
geronimo-specs and needs a release. I have committer access to
geronimo-specs and added to code (implemented by Roberto Cortez in
tomee-security) into my local. Can I commit to code to the geronimo-specs?
Any objection?
Rega
>>>another day another problem
Integration is always hard thing :)
>>>but this is going to involve making the list of ignored interfaces
>>>configurable
>>>and may not be acceptable to OWB.
David, this is an acceptable. Explains why SPI module is there.
--Gurkan
_
Gurkan Erdogdu
PMC Chair, Apache OpenWebBeans
Pete has closed cditck-199 issue. He will release final version as corrected
tomorrow. We need to revert latest commit again :)
Çar, 15 Ara 2010 10:10 EET tarihinde David Jencks şöyle yazdı:
>The cdi guys published a new release of the cdi tck on monday, 1.0.2.SP1.
>Geronimo/owb has 9 or 12 fa
Hello;
FYI : I have sent ApacheNDA to secret...@a.o. 2 days ago to access Geronimo
TCKs.
--Gurkan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12863182#action_12863182
]
Gurkan Erdogdu commented on GERONIMO-5282:
--
I think that spec is not cor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gurkan Erdogdu updated GERONIMO-5194:
-
Attachment: jcdi.patch
> Patch for geronimo-jcdi s
)
Components: specs
Reporter: Gurkan Erdogdu
Fix For: 3.0
Update geronimo-jcdi for updating AnnotationLiteral code.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
to that thread with the JIRA info.
David, thus you can see why I am releasing all of these snapshot specs
as 1.0-beta, since we have not run the full Java EE 6 TCK against them
-Donald
On 2/4/10 2:41 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:49 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
&g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gurkan Erdogdu updated GERONIMO-5121:
-
Attachment: atinject.patch
jcdi.patch
> Update geronimo-jcdi
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: specs
Reporter: Gurkan Erdogdu
Update geronimo-jcdi and geronimo-atinject to pass TCK Signature Tests. This
includes David Jencks comments about serialize ids and enumeration ordering.
--
This
>>> I'm not that happy releasing specs until the implementaition (e.g.
openWebBeans) passes its tck
Then, how could we release our internal milestones without releasing spec. ?
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2010/2/4 David Jencks
>
> On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:49 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
doc "Enum constant
> detail" and NOT that in "Enum constant summary"
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
> On Feb 3, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> That seems OK, It passed signature test.
>
> --Gurkan
>
> --------
That seems OK, It passed signature test.
--Gurkan
From: Donald Woods
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: Gurkan Erdogdu ; d...@openwebbeans.apache.org
Sent: Wed, February 3, 2010 5:13:11 AM
Subject: Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ?
OK, the patch
From: Donald Woods
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: Gurkan Erdogdu ; d...@openwebbeans.apache.org
Sent: Tue, February 2, 2010 3:56:38 PM
Subject: Re: milestone release of geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec ?
For the geronimo spec api, if you open a JIRA and attach the patch, one
of us will get it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5101?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gurkan Erdogdu updated GERONIMO-5101:
-
Attachment: jcdi.patch
> geronimo-jcdi_1_0_spec Update for Releas
(Regular issues)
Components: specs
Reporter: Gurkan Erdogdu
Hi;
This patch updates geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec for passing TCK signature tests.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Moreover, I have to update API to pass CDI TCK signature tests. Currently it
fails. Is it possible to give me a commit access to jcdi and atinject projects?
--Gurkan
From: Gurkan Erdogdu
To: d...@openwebbeans.apache.org; dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: d
Hello,
This is also required for geronimo-interceptor_1.1_spec, currently we use
1.0.0-EA1-SNAPSHOT
--Gurkan
From: Mark Struberg
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: d...@openwebbeans.apache.org
Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 10:54:16 PM
Subject: milestone release o
Hi Jack;
I would like to work with OpenWebBeans integration. Last time we discussed
integration, David Blevins created some modules for openwebbeans
integration. I am going to fill the blanks and see what other pieces are
required.
Could I/you write my name to it?
Thanks;
Gurkan Erdogdu
OWB
: Rick McGuire
>
>
> The geronimo-cdi-1.0 spec jar is using the JEE5 versions of the interceptor
> and expression language spec jars rather than the JEE6 versions.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12795298#action_12795298
]
Gurkan Erdogdu commented on GERONIMO-5007:
--
Could you permit me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gurkan Erdogdu updated GERONIMO-5007:
-
Attachment: interceptor.patch
> Moving javax.interceptor.* from CDI Project
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: specs
Reporter: Gurkan Erdogdu
javax.interceptor.Interceptor and javax.interceptor.InterceptorBinding classes
have moved from CDI Specification to Interceptor 1.1 Specification.
--
This message
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789874#action_12789874
]
Gurkan Erdogdu commented on GERONIMO-4985:
--
https://svn.apache.org/repos
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gurkan Erdogdu updated GERONIMO-4985:
-
Attachment: api.newerpatch
New patch , obsolete old patch!
> Adding JSR-330 and
Hi Kevan;
I have created and patched issue.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4985.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2009/12/9 Kevan Miller
>
> On Dec 9, 2009, at 6:28 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> > Hi folks;
> >
> > We would like to port our JSR-299 and JSR-33
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gurkan Erdogdu updated GERONIMO-4985:
-
Attachment: api.patch
Adding patches for projects. As Kevan said, I only patched
)
Components: specs
Reporter: Gurkan Erdogdu
Adding JSR-330 and JSR-299 Spec. APIs
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
Hi folks;
We would like to port our JSR-299 and JSR-330 related API projects into
Geronimo spec. project. How could we start ?
Thanks;
--Gurkan
rsistence.xml you can have a beans.xml.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:00 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot david jencks. Actually, webbeans can be included in any
>> ejb,war,ear,rar and library modules. But it is a good start with web
>> builders. Let
right you should be able to figure out
> what to do with other module builders.
>
> hope this is in the right direction :-)
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Aug 23, 2009, at 5:32 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
> Hi David;
>
> I have deployed plugins(2 car ) into the
Hi David;
I have deployed plugins(2 car ) into the server. Server calls
OpenWebBeansModuleBuilderExtension while it starts. But it never calls
"createModule, addGBeans" methods. Do I have to configure something for
this?
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2009/8/22 Gurkan Erdogdu
> Gre
e the webapp starts up and stop
> just after the webapp stops. Great place for initialization code and taking
> care of getting any hooks into Geronimo that you might need/want for while
> the webapp is running.
>
> This doesn't tackle everything on the TODO list but is a st
s)
3* Support EJB JAR, EAR, RAR modules
4* Write EJB Plugin for Geronimo
5* Supports injections for Managed Beans
I hope this helps a bit more
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2009/8/20 Rick McGuire
> Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
>
>> >>>We'd be interested in any details about what integ
>>>We'd be interested in any details about what integration work might be
needed to add this to Geronimo.
It is a really fascinating thing that you support us to finish
implementation and pass TCK :) We really need a help.
Thanks;
--Gurkan
2009/8/20 Rick McGuire
> Gur
beans at
> deploy time exactly as we do for JSF.
>
> Wanted to point him at the JSF scanning code, but can't remember the
> details. Anyone remember? An svn link is fine.
>
>
> -David
>
>
>
>
--
Gurkan Erdogdu
http://gurkanerdogdu.blogspot.com
Hi Gianny,
As a keen observer of the Geronimo dev List , I would like to ask question on
this subject.
Gianny, do you want to say that there is an UniversalClassLoader for all the
server instance that contains the other class loaders. IOW, try to change
hierarchical class loaders with the flat
Hi folks,
We are developing the implementation of the JSR-299 WebBeans specification as
an incubator, OpenWebBeans. In the last specification, it says that this
functionality must be integrated into the Java EE 6.0 Servers. Currently,
OpenWebBeans is working as a plugin (i.e configure in the we
40 matches
Mail list logo
