Re: [VOTE] Release geroniom-jsonp_1.1 API.jar

+1 (nonbinding) On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > +1 > > 2017-04-17 0:08 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : >> >> Hi! >> >> Please VOTE on releasing version 1.0 of the Geronimo JSONP 1.1 API. >> >> The staging repo is >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache

Re: [VOTE] fold the various Geronimo subproject mailing lists to the main lists

+1 On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:06 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > +1 > > 2017-04-21 15:24 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : >> >> Hi! >> >> We currently have quite a few lists which have very low traffic. >> >> My findings are a result of browsing lists.a.o. >> >> >> user@g.a.o -> merge into dev@g.a.o We onl

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jsonb_1.0 v 1.0 API jar

+1 (nonbinding) On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:51 AM, Reinhard Sandtner wrote: > +1 (nonbinding) > > lg > reini > > Am 24.04.2017 um 10:04 schrieb Guillaume Nodet : > > +1 > > 2017-04-21 17:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : >> >> Hi! >> >> Please VOTE on releasing version 1.0 of the Geronimo JSONB 1.0 API

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.9.0 release?

; > > > >> On Monday, 2 May 2016, 18:01, Hendrik Dev wrote: >> > i worked a while ago on 1.4 and 1.5. If i recall correctly we released >> 1.4 as an alpha version because no one were able to execute the TCK. >> From my point of view its ready for a release but

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.9.0 release?

i worked a while ago on 1.4 and 1.5. If i recall correctly we released 1.4 as an alpha version because no one were able to execute the TCK. >From my point of view its ready for a release but i don't know if this requires TCK pass. For 1.5 i worked on the spec part, but thats not finished. On Sun,

Re: Slack channel?

like it too, so +1 On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: > wdyt? I love Slack. > > > Regards, > Alan > -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Re: javamail needs james?

james is only needed in test scope, but we can shade it too On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi > > 1.9.0-alpha-1 seems to need james > > do we want to do a shade of these classes as well? > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rman

Re: Active source location

primary repo is svn here: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/ As far as i know only parts are mirrored to github, like https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/tree/trunk https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/tree/trunk ... On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Jay McHugh wrote: > Hey all,

Re: [DISCUSS] Make a new geronimo javamail 1.4 spec release

great On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > for javamail we need both > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2015-02-04 12:51 GMT+01:

Re: [DISCUSS] Make a new geronimo javamail 1.4 spec release

gt; check. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-12-03 13:59 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev : >> Hi Devs, >> >> last geronimo javamail 1.4 spec release (1.7.1)

Re: Geronimo release request

i would like to release javamail as an alpha (or beta) version first because we have not yet executed the TCK and the last changes are big ones and its maybe to 100% stable (yet) On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Guys do you think we can try to plan a release beginning

[DISCUSS] Make a new geronimo javamail 1.4 spec release

Hi Devs, last geronimo javamail 1.4 spec release (1.7.1) was back in 2010. Since then the following issues were fixed: GERONIMO-5842 GERONIMO-6165 GERONIMO-6438 GERONIMO-6471 GERONIMO-6480 GERONIMO-6530 + some NOTICE/legal stuff I'd like to propose to make a new release (1.7.2 or maybe 1.8.0 ?)

Re: CI for geronimo

ready > had all the appropriate jars locally. Since felix is up to v 4 or so now > maybe updating things would be appropriate. > > I'm not sure if I will have time but will make some effort to look at this > this weekend… > > thanks > david jencks > > O

Re: CI for geronimo

net.URL.openStream(URL.java:1037) I am really not in OSGI so maybe somebody can give me hint. Thanks Hendrik On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > No real time to help but +1 > > Le 27 nov. 2014 12:39, "Hendrik Dev" a écrit : > >> Is the

CI for geronimo

Is there a running CI/buildserver setup for Geronimo? If not i like to setup Jenkins for Javamail and Specs CI builds. Maybe also xbean needs a CI setup? Thanks Hendrik -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Re: Javamail 1.4 Version 1.9.0 proposal

next one which fixes Fix GERONIMO-6165 https://github.com/salyh/jm14specsvn/commit/9563e09ba5ddfb74401eb7d5b37abb60ceb3ea7c I replaced the original QuotedPrintable encoding/decoding stuff with mime4j (included as shaded jar) On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > Thanks

Re: Javamail 1.4 Version 1.9.0 proposal

, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: >> >> But despite of that the feature discussion is the important one. Have >> not looked yet on greenmail 1.4 but i would like to use a "real" >> mailserver to te

Re: Javamail 1.4 Version 1.9.0 proposal

lready :-) On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > Hi Hendrik. > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Hendrik Dev > wrote: >> >> Hi Kevan, >> >> thanks, wil try to split commits. >> >> About greenmail replacement: >> Two reasons

Re: Javamail 1.4 Version 1.9.0 proposal

them, but if it's possible/feasible, please commit in functional pieces. > Not all at once... > > Some explanation/background of the greenmail -> James replacement would > be appreciated... > > --kevan > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Hendrik Dev > wrote: &

Re: Javamail 1.4 Version 1.9.0 proposal

tional pieces. > Not all at once... > > Some explanation/background of the greenmail -> James replacement would be > appreciated... > > --kevan > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Hendrik Dev > wrote: > >> I did some work on Javamail 1.4 and want to discuss

Javamail 1.4 Version 1.9.0 proposal

I did some work on Javamail 1.4 and want to discuss the changes before commit them: - Replaced greenmail with apache james - Added new testcases, more to come ... - Fixed APOP authentication for POP3 - Starttls is now also working for POP3 - Some love for pom's - Fixed issues: Support for proper

Re: JEE6 TCKs

great, thanks On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hello > > http://geronimo.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-project-policies.html > > Le 30 oct. 2014 21:31, "Hendrik Dev" a écrit : > >> How can i get access to the JEE6 TCKs (especially th

JEE6 TCKs

How can i get access to the JEE6 TCKs (especially the one for javamail 1.4 which is JSR 919)? Possible? Thanks Hendrik -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Re: Jira permissions

great, thanks On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > You should be all set. I also gave Mark and Romain jira admin privileges. > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Hendrik Dev wrote: >> >> Can someone with the right karma grant me some more jira permiss

Jira permissions

Can someone with the right karma grant me some more jira permissions so that i can assign issues and close issues? Javamail gets some love from me ... :-) Jira id is salyh Thanks Hendrik -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Re: JSR 366 (JEE 8) expert group launch

;> On Thursday, 25 September 2014, 13:00, Hendrik Dev >> wrote: >> > JCP ballot for JSR 366 is completed and they seems to launch soon the >> expert group (after recovering from JavaOne). >> >> Under the umbrella of JSR 366 (at least TMK) is currently: >>

JSR 366 (JEE 8) expert group launch

JCP ballot for JSR 366 is completed and they seems to launch soon the expert group (after recovering from JavaOne). Under the umbrella of JSR 366 (at least TMK) is currently: - Contexts and Dependency Injection for Java 2.0 (JSR 365) - Java API for JSON Binding (JSON-B) (JSR 367) - Java Message Se

Re: Javamail 1.5 implementation

t;> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> 2014-08-04 18:24 GMT+02:00 Hendrik Dev : >>> do we have the javamail 1.5 TCK already? >>> I am pretty much close to submit the 1.5 spec impl. >>>

Re: Javamail 1.5 implementation

do we have the javamail 1.5 TCK already? I am pretty much close to submit the 1.5 spec impl. On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Hendrik > > Awesome! Didnt target it before being web profile compliant but great if > already in place > > Le 1 août 20

Javamail 1.5 implementation

Hi, just saw that geronimo/tomee ships with Javamail 1.4. If there is some interest i will volunteer to work on a 1.5 implementation. Just want to make sure that this would be useful before start working on this. Thanks Hendrik -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Re: Your project uses a possibly LGPL dependency: com.icegreen.greenmail:greenmail

> On Jul 12, 2014, at 12:54 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i am the author and IP holder of the "javamail mock2 library which" >> maybe can be used an as alternative for greenmail here. >> Its not exactly doing what greenmail is doing (mock2

Re: Your project uses a possibly LGPL dependency: com.icegreen.greenmail:greenmail

Hi, i am the author and IP holder of the "javamail mock2 library which" maybe can be used an as alternative for greenmail here. Its not exactly doing what greenmail is doing (mock2 is mocking javamail classes like Folder, Transport, Store and so on and does not emulate a mailserver on the protocol