[VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

Hi everyone, I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec 2.1 *SVN Tag* https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec-1.0.0/ *Staging repo*

[jira] [Assigned] (GERONIMO-6870) RFC822 violation with duplicated headers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro reassigned GERONIMO-6870: - Assignee: Jean-Louis Monteiro > RFC822 violation with duplica

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6870) RFC822 violation with duplicated headers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6870. --- Fix Version/s: Mail_2.1_1.1.0 Resolution: Fixed > RFC822 violat

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6869) InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same address

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6869. --- Fix Version/s: Mail_2.1_1.1.0 Resolution: Fixed

[jira] [Assigned] (GERONIMO-6869) InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same address

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro reassigned GERONIMO-6869: - Assignee: Jean-Louis Monteiro > InternetAddress.toStr

Mail bugs

Hi all, I've just pushed a couple of changes https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1918229 It fixes https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870 Hopefully it does not break more. -- Jean-Louis

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6870) RFC822 violation with duplicated headers

Jean-Louis Monteiro created GERONIMO-6870: - Summary: RFC822 violation with duplicated headers Key: GERONIMO-6870 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6870 Project: Geronimo

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6869) InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same address

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6869?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro updated GERONIMO-6869: -- Component/s: mail > InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addres

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6869) InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same address

Jean-Louis Monteiro created GERONIMO-6869: - Summary: InternetAddress.toString(InternetAddress[] addresses) prints the same address Key: GERONIMO-6869 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 2.0.0 - Binaries

+1 Le ven. 3 mai 2024, 09:44, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 5:22 PM fpapon wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > A problem occured with the stagging repository of the release (the repo > > has been dropped), so had to redeploy them to a

Re: [batch] 2.0.0 release?

+1, thank you Le dim. 21 avr. 2024 à 10:10, Richard Zowalla a écrit : > Guess, you can go for it :-) > I am done with my changes. > > Gruß > Richard > > > Am 21. April 2024 10:01:44 MESZ schrieb Francois Papon < > francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: > >> +1 >> >> I can try to run the release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.4

+1 binding Thanks Le dim. 24 mars 2024, 17:35, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > Le ven. 22 mars 2024 à 21:40, fpapon a écrit : > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I submit Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.4 release to your vote. >> >> Release Notes: >> >> * [BATCHEE-169]

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.8 release

+1 (binding) Le mar. 30 janv. 2024 à 09:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 9:36 AM fpapon wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I submit Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.8 release to your vote. > > > > Release Notes: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo TXManager 4.0.0 release

+1 Le ven. 20 oct. 2023, 14:39, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Le ven. 20 oct. 2023 à 11:26, fpapon a écrit : > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I submit Apache Geronimo TXManager 4..0.0 release to your vote. >> >> Release Notes: >> >>

Re: Milestone / Alpha Release of geronimo-txmanager?

+1 for final and then patch version if there is a bug Le jeu. 19 oct. 2023, 21:08, Francois Papon a écrit : > +1 for a final :) > On 19/10/2023 19:44, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > so let's do a final would be my 2 cts ;) > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau |

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.23 release

+1 Le lun. 16 oct. 2023, 16:03, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > +1 > > Le ven. 13 oct. 2023 à 16:04, fpapon a écrit : > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I submit Apache XBean 4.24 release to your vote. >> >> This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on >> the release note): >> >> -

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.24 release

+1 Le lun. 16 oct. 2023, 16:03, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > +1 > > Le ven. 13 oct. 2023 à 16:42, fpapon a écrit : > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I submit Apache XBean 4.24 release to your vote. >> >> This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on >> the release note): >> >> -

Re: [XBEAN] Next release

Fine with it. Thank you Le mer. 11 oct. 2023, 12:05, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Arthur 1.0.7

+1 Le lun. 21 août 2023 à 08:49, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > My own +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github > | LinkedIn

Re: Coming arthur release

Hi, No problem Romain Thanks for the visibility. Le jeu. 17 août 2023 à 20:37, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi all, > > With François we noticed that Arthur does not support very well last > graalvm (ce and oracle) repositories. > I'm planning to enhance the download and release soon after.

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6849) Add geronimo-transaction-spring module (was: jencks)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17752167#comment-17752167 ] Jean-Louis Monteiro commented on GERONIMO-6849: --- I don't mind if you want to add

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.23 release

+1 Thanks François Le mer. 17 mai 2023, 01:25, Guillaume Nodet a écrit : > +1 > > Le mar. 16 mai 2023 à 18:00, fpapon a écrit : > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I submit Apache XBean 4.23 release to your vote. >> >> This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on >> the release

Re: [XBean] next release

Go for it. Thanks François Le jeu. 11 mai 2023 à 12:47, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Le jeu. 11 mai 2023 à 11:53, fpapon a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> We have a request from a user to release XBean after the upgrade of ASM >> dependency. >> >> If there is no objection, I can start the

Re: Status BatchEE-2.0.0

Yes. Let's use the major release to remove the components not ready. As Romain says it's easy to add them back if needed Le mar. 25 avr. 2023, 09:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Agree, I also think we can drop all our extensions "components" since the > reusability was never reached (it is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE-1.0.3

+1 Le mer. 19 avr. 2023 à 11:19, Francois Papon a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > regards, > > François > On 18/04/2023 12:26, Mark Struberg via dev wrote: > > Hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing BatchEE-1.0.3. > > This is mostly an update to the latest TomEE version and a fix in the >

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Arthur 1.0.6

+1 (binding) Le lun. 17 avr. 2023 à 20:55, fpapon a écrit : > Hi, > > This is a call to vote in favor of releasing Apache Geronimo Arthur > version 1.0.6. > > We solved 7 issues: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220=12351343 > > ** Bug > *

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6847) Switch Language Level to 11 in TX Manager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6847?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6847. --- Fix Version/s: TxManager-4.0.0 Resolution: Fixed Thanks [~rzo1

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6844) Jakarta Version of Geronimo TX Manager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6844. --- Fix Version/s: TxManager-4.0.0 Resolution: Fixed Thanks [~rzo1

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6846) Replace Dependency Towards SLF4J with JUL in TX Manager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6846. --- Fix Version/s: TxManager-4.0.0 Resolution: Fixed Thanks [~rzo1

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6845) Provide Genesis Flava for Java 11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6845. --- Resolution: Won't Fix We don't need that parent pom anymore. Let's start

Re: Terminate Specs jars in Geronimo

//www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le ven. 6 janv. 2023 à 13:04, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a écrit : > >> Hi all, >> >> Historically due to legal restrictions mainly, we created a bunch of spec

Terminate Specs jars in Geronimo

can terminate the spec jars and only maintain what we have if needed but encourage Apache projects to rely on Eclipse APIs instead. What do you think? Did I miss something? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [batchee] future?

mannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-

Re: [batchee] future?

imo > projects and subprojects.* > > *+1* > > Actually I'd rather keep it here as it is used outside TomEE as well. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 23.11.2022 um 10:15 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > I've opened a thread on the TomEE side to maybe transitio

Re: [batchee] future?

I've opened a thread on the TomEE side to maybe transition BatchEE to TomEE. *Overall I don't understand the recent discussions to kill all Geronimo projects and subprojects.* Le mar. 22 nov. 2022 à 23:33, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > No requirement, just making it living (updating versions

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.22 release

+1 Le lun. 10 oct. 2022 à 14:04, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1, thanks François! > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github >

Re: Proposal: Retiring the Geronimo Project

Let's push that conversation for October. There is activity for now and no real issue to rush it. A lot of people are going in and out for summer time. Le dim. 17 juil. 2022, 08:18, Francois Papon a écrit : > +1 for retiring the main project and finding hosts for sub projects. > > regards, > >

[VOTE RESULT] Apache Geronimo Mail (provider) 2.1 - 1.0.0

Hi! Vote passed with 3 bindings +1 and no other vote. Thanks Le mar. 21 juin 2022 à 09:26, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > My own +1 > > Le lun. 20 juin 2022 à 17:14, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a écrit : > >> Hi, >> >> I'd like

[VOTE RESULT] Geronimo activation_2.0_spec 1.0.0

Hi! Vote passed with 4 +1 and no other votes. I'll proceed. Thanks so much everyone. JLouis Le mar. 24 mai 2022 à 11:45, Jean-Louis Monteiro a écrit : > Here we go > > We now pass all TCK and signature tests. Thanks Richard. > > This is essentially the same as the M1 Davi

[VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail (provider) 2.1 - 1.0.0

My own +1 Le lun. 20 juin 2022 à 17:14, Jean-Louis Monteiro a écrit : > Hi, > > I'd like to call a vote for Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 version 1.0.0. This > is the first implementation of the Jakarta based Mail 2.1 specification. It > does not fully pass the standalone TCK bu

Apache Geronimo Mail (provider) 2.1 - 1.0.0

y after IMAP CONTINUATION response - [GERONIMO-6839 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6839>] - Upgrade to Activation Spec 2.0 - 1.0.0-M1 [ ] +1 approve this release [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Here is my +1 Binding vote. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6839) Upgrade to Activation Spec 2.0 - 1.0.0-M1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6839?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6839. --- Resolution: Fixed > Upgrade to Activation Spec 2.0 - 1.0.0

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6838) Support additional body after IMAP CONTINUATION response

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6838. --- Resolution: Fixed > Support additional body after IMAP CONTINUAT

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6839) Upgrade to Activation Spec 2.0 - 1.0.0-M1

Jean-Louis Monteiro created GERONIMO-6839: - Summary: Upgrade to Activation Spec 2.0 - 1.0.0-M1 Key: GERONIMO-6839 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6839 Project: Geronimo

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6838) Support additional body after IMAP CONTINUATION response

Jean-Louis Monteiro created GERONIMO-6838: - Summary: Support additional body after IMAP CONTINUATION response Key: GERONIMO-6838 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6838

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6837) Implement Geronimo Mail 2.1 for Jakarta Mail 2.1

Jean-Louis Monteiro created GERONIMO-6837: - Summary: Implement Geronimo Mail 2.1 for Jakarta Mail 2.1 Key: GERONIMO-6837 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6837 Project

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6837) Implement Geronimo Mail 2.1 for Jakarta Mail 2.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6837. --- Resolution: Fixed > Implement Geronimo Mail 2.1 for Jakarta Mail

Re: Moving Mail, Activation, Transaction and Connector to Apache TomEE (was Re: [DISCUSS] Move microprofile impl to Apache TomEE)

+1 Le dim. 19 juin 2022 à 16:02, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi, > > Activation, transaction and connector are used also in Aries, ActiveMQ, > Karaf. > > So, no problem for me as soon as we keep the "generic" aspect (not > TomEE too centric). > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo activation_2.0_spec 1.0.0

Is there any interest to vote on this one? Le lun. 30 mai 2022 à 16:10, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > up ... > > Le mer. 25 mai 2022 à 14:54, Romain Manni-Bucau a > écrit : > >> +1 after the discussion in the other thread and points Richard raised >> >> R

[VOTE RESULT] Apache BatchEE 1.0.2

Hi! Vote passed with 5 +1 and no other vote. Thanks everyone. I'll proceed with the remaining steps. JLouis Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 10:41, Jean-Louis Monteiro a écrit : > Hi, > > As discussed, here is the vote for Apache BatchEE 1.0.2. > > This is a maintenance release w

Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 1.0.2

My own +1 Le ven. 17 juin 2022 à 15:21, fpapon a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > Regards, > > > On 17/06/2022 10:40, Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > > Hi, > > As discussed, here is the vote for Apache BatchEE 1.0.2. > > This is a maintenance release with minor fix

[VOTE] Apache BatchEE 1.0.2

-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

BatchEE releases?

Hi, is there any issue if I do a release for BatchEE? I'd like to create a new TomEE mIlestone soon, but we are still using a SNAPSHOT. Thanks -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] Release Mail 2.0.0-M1

Hey David, Can you help me find the artifacts please? I looked at the staging repo, but it does not exist. Looked at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/geronimo/ and I can't see the artifacts. I'd like to do some upgrades in TomEE, but can't find where the

BatchEE TCK?

Hi, Did someone try to run jBatch TCK against BatchEE? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo activation_2.0_spec 1.0.0

net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le mer. 25 mai 2022 à

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo activation_2.0_spec 1.0.0

here is my own +1 (binding) Le mer. 25 mai 2022 à 02:12, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > I always find it better when we can keep backward compatibility for users. > But this is a major version and I'm not a big fan of cheap system > properties. > > If we think it's not good, w

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo activation_2.0_spec 1.0.0

> > > > > > Gruß > > > > > Richard > > > > > Von: Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Mai 2022 11:53:37 > > > > > An: dev@geronimo.apache.org > > > > > Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Geronimo activation_2.0_spec 1.0.

[VOTE] Geronimo activation_2.0_spec 1.0.0

comments) [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments) This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Thanks -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: GERONIMO-6832 - SigTests + TCK Failures for Activation 2.0.0-M1

Hi Richard, I reviewed and merged you diff. Thanks Le lun. 23 mai 2022 à 21:56, Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit : > Hi all, > > I gave it a try: the main issues were related to the change regarding > java.desktop. > > I added a patch (svn diff) to >

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6832) Fix TCK + Signature Tests for geronimo-activation_2.0_spec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6832. --- Fix Version/s: Spec_Activation_2.0_1.0.0 Resolution: Fixed Thanks

Submitting a CCR for Geronimo Mail and Activation

Hello, With the last release David did, Richard ran the TCK and the signature tests and it looks like we are now fully compliant. What about submitting a CCR to Eclipse foundation Jakarta to be listed as a compliant implementation? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http

Re: [VOTE] Release Activation 2.0.0-M1

+1 Same feedback, I'd go for a final. There is no work remaining as far as I can tell Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 09:03, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi > > If we are confident to match javax/jakarta namespace change why not doing > a final? Errors/missing features could go in bugs. > Issue with

Re: [VOTE] Release Mail 2.0.0-M1

+1 But I agree with Romain, don't think there is remaining work on this one for now. So wondering why we need a milestone. We ran the unit tests and we ran all the platform TCK for Mail and everything is passing. Le dim. 15 mai 2022 à 11:31, Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6829) Create geronimo-jakartamail_2.1_spec & geronimo-activation_2.0_spec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6829. --- Resolution: Fixed > Create geronimo-jakartamail_2.1_spec & g

Re: TomEE MicroProfile and Jakarta

-- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Sat, Apr 2, 2022 at 11:13 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Great discussion. Thanks everyone. > > I'll look at Sallrye over the weekend and see how hard it is to repla

Re: TomEE MicroProfile and Jakarta

Great discussion. Thanks everyone. I'll look at Sallrye over the weekend and see how hard it is to replace our Apache libraries. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 12:48 PM David Blevins wrote: > This is very cl

TomEE MicroProfile and Jakarta

their equivalent in jakarta namespace using the same approach as for the APIs. What are your thoughts? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6754) Update Johnzon to 1.2.1 in Geronimo OpenAPI

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro updated GERONIMO-6754: -- Fix Version/s: OpenTracing_1.0.4

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6728) Geronimo OpenTracing OpenTracingServerRequestFilter is fired twice

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro updated GERONIMO-6728: -- Fix Version/s: OpenTracing_1.0.4

[RESULT] Apache TransactionManager 3.1.5 and Geronimo Config 1.2.3, Health 2.0.1, OpenAPI 1.0.15, OpenTracing 1.0.3, Metrics 1.0.6

Hi! Vote passes with 4 +1 and no other vote. I'll promote binaries, update JIRA, dist area and all remaining tasks Thanks everyone Le mer. 2 mars 2022 à 19:45, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > My own +1 > > Le mer. 2 mars 2022 à 14:08, Francois Papon > a écrit : > >> +1 (

Re: [VOTE Apache TransactionManager 3.1.5 and Geronimo Config 1.2.3, Health 2.0.1, OpenAPI 1.0.15, OpenTracing 1.0.3, Metrics 1.0.6

My own +1 Le mer. 2 mars 2022 à 14:08, Francois Papon a écrit : > +1 (binding) > > Thanks! > > regards, > > François > On 25/02/2022 12:10, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > > Hi! > > Just adding VOTE to the message object so it's clear. > > JLouis >

[VOTE Apache TransactionManager 3.1.5 and Geronimo Config 1.2.3, Health 2.0.1, OpenAPI 1.0.15, OpenTracing 1.0.3, Metrics 1.0.6

Hi! Just adding VOTE to the message object so it's clear. JLouis Le jeu. 24 févr. 2022 à 20:22, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I'd like to release our Apache TransactionManager 3.1.5 and Geronimo > Config 1.2.3, Health 2.0.1, OpenAPI 1.0.15, OpenTracing 1.

Apache TransactionManager 3.1.5 and Geronimo Config 1.2.3, Health 2.0.1, OpenAPI 1.0.15, OpenTracing 1.0.3, Metrics 1.0.6

Hi everyone, I'd like to release our Apache TransactionManager 3.1.5 and Geronimo Config 1.2.3, Health 2.0.1, OpenAPI 1.0.15, OpenTracing 1.0.3, Metrics 1.0.6. Main change is to support a jakarta classifier so they can be used in the context of jakarta namespace, the reason why this vote

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6828) Support for Jakarta classifier binaries for jakarta namespace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6828. --- Fix Version/s: Health_2.0.1 Metrics_1.0.6

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6828) Support for Jakarta classifier binaries for jakarta namespace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro updated GERONIMO-6828: -- Component/s: transaction manager > Support for Jakarta classifier binar

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6828) Support for Jakarta classifier binaries for jakarta namespace

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6828?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro updated GERONIMO-6828: -- Description: The idea is to leverage the maven shade plugin to relocated

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6828) Support for Jakarta classifier binaries for jakarta namespace

Jean-Louis Monteiro created GERONIMO-6828: - Summary: Support for Jakarta classifier binaries for jakarta namespace Key: GERONIMO-6828 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6828

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6827) Jakarta version of Gronimo Transaction manager

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6827. --- Assignee: Jean-Louis Monteiro Resolution: Fixed > Jakarta vers

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6827) Jakarta version of Gronimo Transaction manager

Jean-Louis Monteiro created GERONIMO-6827: - Summary: Jakarta version of Gronimo Transaction manager Key: GERONIMO-6827 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6827 Project

Re: website subcontexts?

Hi! I have no idea how this works, I'm afraid Le dim. 31 oct. 2021 à 19:18, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi all, > > since CMS was dropped I'm not sure how we are supposed to publish > subcontext websites. > > svn seems inactive ( >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE 1.0.1

+1 Le dim. 31 oct. 2021 à 11:55, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > My own +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github > | LinkedIn

[RESULT][VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

Le 15 oct. 2021 à 21:16, Francois Papon a > écrit : > >  > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks! > > regards, > > Françoisfpapon@apache.orgfrancois.pa...@openobject.fr > > Le 15/10/2021 à 15:47, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > > Hi! > > I’d like to call a V

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

+1 (binding) Le ven. 15 oct. 2021 à 15:55, Zowalla, Richard < richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit : > +1 (thx, JL) > > Am Freitag, dem 15.10.2021 um 15:47 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO: > > Hi! > > > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javam

[VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 (reroll)

Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 Importante note: we previously voted for the spec part. This vote is for the provider and the mail core. This is a re-roll because we were missing the spec update. Here is the staging repo

[CANCEL][VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

Even though it is not a legal issue, I'll reroll to update the spec part in the provider and mail. For javamail, they are all pretty much tight together so better to update spec Le mar. 12 oct. 2021 à 22:51, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Hi! > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

I'll cancel this one and re-roll. Le ven. 15 oct. 2021 à 15:18, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > It would have been better yes > > Le ven. 15 oct. 2021 à 15:17, Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> a écrit : > >> Shouldn't it be spec v1.0.1 in the PO

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

6 > > I am just curios and might be wrong? :) > > > Am Dienstag, dem 12.10.2021 um 22:51 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO: > > Hi! > > > > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) > > 1.0.1 > > Importante note: we previousl

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

; richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>) escribió: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Am Dienstag, dem 12.10.2021 um 22:51 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO: >>> > Hi! >>> > >>> > I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(prov

[VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1

Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_(provider|mail) 1.0.1 Importante note: we previously voted for the spec part. This vote is for the provider and the mail core. Here is the staging repo https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1142

[RESULT][VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1

Hi! Vote passes with 7 +1 and no other vote. Jean-Baptiste (Binding), Romain (Binding), Richard, Jean-Louis (Binding), Cesar, Raymond, François (Binding) I'll proceed with the other steps Thanks everyone Le jeu. 7 oct. 2021 à 21:30, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit : > Hi! > > I’d lik

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6800) MimeBodyPart.setText ignores subtype

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jean-Louis Monteiro resolved GERONIMO-6800. --- Resolution: Fixed > MimeBodyPart.setText ignores subt

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1

>> >> I'm not sure to understand, we moved the source repository from svn to >> gitbox for javamail so for me it's a -1. >> >> Can you do the release from gitbox? >> >> regards, >> >> Françoisfpapon@apache.orgfrancois.pa...@openobject.fr >>

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1

ou can run both at the > > same time making downstream one dependent on this one ;)) > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > > > > Le ven. 8 oct. 2021 à 10:13, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a > > écrit : > >

[VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1

Hi! I’d like to call a VOTE on the geronimo-javamail_1.6_spec 1.0.1 Here is the staging repo https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1141 And the source jar which is voted on

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6800) MimeBodyPart.setText ignores subtype

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17425427#comment-17425427 ] Jean-Louis Monteiro commented on GERONIMO-6800: --- [~Argannor] can you please sign

Re: [VOTE] Apache Bean 4.19 release

+1 Le mar. 13 avr. 2021 à 07:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I submit XBean 4.19 to your vote. > > This release especially includes: > - Upgrade to ASM 9.1 > - Fix a NPE when the superclass is not set in the bundle finder > - Fix OSGi headers in asm9 shaded artifact > >

Re: Release XBean 4.19

+1 Le sam. 10 avr. 2021 à 11:34, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > +1 > > Le sam. 10 avr. 2021 à 08:17, a écrit : > >> Hi JB, >> >> Sounds good to me. >> >> Regards, >> >> François >> fpa...@apache.org >> >> Le 10/04/2021 à 07:12, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a écrit : >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > As

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-openapi-1.0.14

+1 Le jeu. 3 déc. 2020 à 17:40, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > My own +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github > | LinkedIn >

Fwd: Geronimo Java Mail 1.6 in TomEE 8.0.5 -> TLS 1.2 / 1.3 Support?

If someone has an idea -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com -- Forwarded message - From: Jean-Louis Monteiro Date: Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 12:16 PM Subject: Re: Geronimo Java Mail 1.6 in TomEE 8.0.5 -> TLS 1.2 / 1.3 Support? To:

  1   2   3   4   >