There should be a public vote.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
wrote:
> I think we came to an agreement so far
>
> Le mar. 25 avr. 2017 à 00:21, Mark Struberg a écrit :
>
>> Or do we need another formal vote?
>>
>> If we are all on the same boat, when, how and who is drafti
?
http://geronimo.apache.org/ is maintained by confluence. There's an edit
icon in the upper right corner.
kevan
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> Can someone point me to more docs about how the G site is maintained?
> Would love to reorg it a bit and add i
if he currently has no time to commit but only wants to provide guide and
>> feedback.
>> >
>> > The first step I recommend is be to merge various mailing lists
>> together.
>> > Then we need to verify the charter and probably tweak it for the new
>>
"need" and "in use" does not necessarily translate into community. The need
for the geronimo components that have been discussed is not new. As far as
I can tell, so far, that has not translated into a community.
If we want to continue the project, demonstrate the community that is
needed for the
Thanks Alan! Many thanks for all you've done!
I think we all agree that it is time to retire the Geronimo Server portions
of the project.
My apologies to Romain, Mark, David, and others, but:
I think the entire project should be retired. I confess that I am not
closely following the dev list (I
Thanks Eduardo!
If there are people interested in working on updating the Geronimo server,
I'm sure the community would happily support these efforts. So, if you or
anyone else are interested, please speak up!
Also, if there are people interested in supporting the currently released
version(s) of
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote:
> But despite of that the feature discussion is the important one. Have
> not looked yet on greenmail 1.4 but i would like to use a "real"
> mailserver to test the javamail impl. and james seems to be the
> perfect candidate:
> its an apache pro
Hi Hendrik.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:27 AM, Hendrik Dev
wrote:
> Hi Kevan,
>
> thanks, wil try to split commits.
>
> About greenmail replacement:
> Two reasons, mainly because greenmail does not support advanced imap
> features (like IDLE) and does not support some basics like Pop3 APOP and
>
Thanks Hendrik!
That's a lot of changes to digest. I'm not sure how you intend to commit
them, but if it's possible/feasible, please commit in functional pieces.
Not all at once...
Some explanation/background of the greenmail -> James replacement would be
appreciated...
--kevan
On Sat, Nov 8, 2
You should be all set. I also gave Mark and Romain jira admin privileges.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 1:49 AM, Hendrik Dev wrote:
> Can someone with the right karma grant me some more jira permissions
> so that i can assign issues and close issues?
>
> Javamail gets some love from me ... :-)
>
> Jir
Looks good. Thanks Jarek.
--kevan
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a bit late but I created a draft board report for October:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-10+-+October
>
> If I missed some
+1
signature, hashes, license/notice, build, RAT all look good to me.
Thanks Mark!
--kevan
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> genesis is our parents project collector for all geronimo projects.
> The main changes for 2.2 have been the automatic enablement of the
IIRC, there used to be more KEYS files... ;-)
dist/geronimo/KEYS is the official location for release signing keys
(should be the case for all . For tracking purposes (maybe?) we've also had
a copy in svn -- geronimo/KEYS. The two files should be kept in sync. I
don't really recall the exact reaso
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> Is your PGP key in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS? I
> can't get the signatures to verify.
>
Thanks Alan! I failed to note that I didn't have gpg on the machine I
validated the release on... Need to get that fixed...
I'm voting on the release archive:
http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1002/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.4/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.4-source-release.tar.gz
The release archive should be identified as part of the vote.
I have the following
Thanks Steve. For clarity:
This message announces a license switch for Greenmail --
http://sourceforge.net/p/greenmail/mailman/message/58953/
However, some/most/all of the src license headers are still labeled as
LGPL. There would also be general questions about the license switch --
were all nece
Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek.
--kevan
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft board report for July:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-07+-+July
>
> If I missed so
Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek.
--kevan
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I created a draft board report for April:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2014-04+-+April
>
> If I missed something please let me kn
Looks good to me. Thanks Jarek!
--kevan
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Last chance to review / update the draft. I will publish it later today.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> > Sorry, it's a bit late but I created a draft boa
Thanks Jarek. Looks good to me.
--kevan
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I created a draft board report for October:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2013-10+-+October
>
> If I missed something please let me know of up
Thanks Jay!
--kevan
On Sep 27, 2013, at 12:08 PM, "Jay D. McHugh (Confluence)"
wrote:
...
> Page removed by Jay D. McHugh
>
>
>
>
All,
Due to recent changes in my life, I've had less and less time to devote to the
Geronimo project. Last month, I told the PMC that I wished to step down from my
PMC Chair duties.
The Geronimo PMC unanimously nominated Jarek Gawor to become the PMC Chair. I'm
happy to announce that at this m
On Jun 7, 2013, at 3:16 PM, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
> A JIRA cannot be assigned to you unless you are a developer (committer), but
> you should be able to contribute to the issue such as submit patches etc…
Not quite. There is a JIRA category of 'contributor'. We allow JIRA's to be
assigned
On Jun 7, 2013, at 3:04 PM, Andrew McCright wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I would like to contribute some code - specifically some Java EE 7 API code.
> The JIRA web tool does not give me an option to assign an issue to me. Do I
> need to be in some sort of contributor list? If so, can someone ple
On Jun 2, 2013, at 6:03 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Time to close the VOTE
>
>
> The VOTE has passed with the following:
>
> +1: Forrest Xia, Romain Manni-Bucau, Kevan Miller, Jarek Gawor
> +0: none
> -1: none
>
>
> I'll go on and propagate the artifac
Here's my +1
Signature/checksum, license/notice, RAT, and build all look good.
On Mac OS, I built as follows:
$ PATH=/usr/local/apache-maven-2.2.1/bin:$PATH
M2_HOME=/usr/local/apache-maven-2.2.1/
JAVA_HOME=/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/CurrentJDK/Home
mvn clean install
There's one minor problem, that I see.
The source archive contains a DEPENDENCIES file that causes the RAT check to
fail. After removing the file, I'm able to build. This file is not present in
the svn tag.
Everything else looks good: signature/checksum, license/notice, source, RAT.
I'm ok wi
Forrest, by my count this vote was open just a bit more than 24 hours. The norm
is a minimum of 72 hours. There are times when expedited release votes can be
used, but not without discussion.
I notice that there is not an actual source archive that is buildable. The
references sources jar only
Hi Mark,
I'm seeing a few problems. Looks like I may have missed them in the last
release. Anyway, I think they need to be fixed. My bad for not seeing sooner...
Missing an Apache source license header:
xbean-finder/src/test/java/org/apache/xbean/finder/ClassAnnotationFinderTest.java
xbean-find
On May 28, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Alan, Kevan, can you try changing the maven-eclipsepde-plugin version
> dependency to 1.2-SNAPSHOT and see if the code at least compiles now?
Hi Jarek,
Using Java 6, Maven 2.2.1 and 1.2-SNAPSHOT of the maven-eclipsepde-plugin
allows me to buil
On May 28, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> what you mean "I should be able to vote for the release once the SNAPSHOT
> issues are resolved."??
Oops. Sorry for all the noise I generated. You can ignore… I was searching mail
history and accidentally thought this was the current vote thr
On May 28, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> what you mean "I should be able to vote for the release once the SNAPSHOT
> issues are resolved."??
On Jul 17, 2012, at 2:25 AM, Yi Xiao wrote:
> Hi Jarek,
>
> You are right.
> I use mvn release:prepare -Pallsubproject and mvn release:per
On Jul 17, 2012, at 2:25 AM, Yi Xiao wrote:
> Hi Jarek,
>
> You are right.
> I use mvn release:prepare -Pallsubproject and mvn release:perform
> -Pallsubproject but there is no allsubproject profile...
>
> Thank you for pointing it out.
> I will re-release it.
If we cannot build GEP on Mac
On May 28, 2013, at 11:21 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> Kevan,
>
> Are you using Mac 64bit ?
Yes.
--kevan
On May 28, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> What's your configuration on Mac OS?
>
> Java version? In what module does the problem happen?
I've tried both Java 6 and Java 7.
Java 6 fails with:
[INFO]
[INFO] Buil
On May 28, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> GEP only build with maven 2.2.1
If so, can we put a BUILDING or README with build instructions? Won't require
it for this release, but would be good to have clear instructions.
I'm still having a build error:
[INFO]
How are you building? I'm getting the following errors. Maybe a Mac OS issue?
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Total time: 14.681s
[INFO] Finis
+1
signature/checksum, license/notice, rat, build, and simple testing all look
good. Thanks Forrest!
--kevan
On May 23, 2013, at 1:26 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> This is the third time to vote for Geronimo 3.0.1 release. Thanks Jarek to
> help on fixing Geronimo-6034.
>
> For Geronimo 3.0.1 re
I've been trying off and on to get a clean build since Friday. I'm currently
failing with:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project geronimo-clustering-wadi: Could not
resolve dependencies for project
org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-clustering-wadi:bundle:3.0.1-SNAPSHOT:
Could not find
All looks good to me. Source, license/notice, rat, build…
Thanks Forrest!
--kevan
On May 17, 2013, at 2:06 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please revote for the Geronimo Tomcat fork 7.0.39.2 release, which merges a
> tomcat security fix for CVE-2013-2071
>
> The components up for vote are:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13659652#comment-13659652
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6451:
Hi Pinaki,
I assume that yo
On May 16, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I'm ok with trying 7.0.40. If it takes more then a week to resolve any
> potential regressions we can always switch back to 7.0.39 quickly.
> Alternatively, we can also port back specific fixes from 7.0.40 to our
> 7.0.39.
I'm fine with either
On May 12, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Tomcat fork 7.0.39.1 is out, shall we start release of 3.0.1? Anything more
> to add, please comment it on, or I will start the release process around May
> 16.
Unless I'm mistaken, looks like we'll need to move up to 7.0.40.
--kevan
+1
Source, license/notice, RAT, and build all look good to me.
--kevan
On May 9, 2013, at 10:41 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please revote for the Geronimo Tomcat 7.0.39.1 release, which is based on
> Tomcat 7.0.39 tag.
>
> The components up for vote are:
> https://repository.apache.org
On May 9, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
> I got
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> org.codehaus.mojo:rat-maven-plugin:1.0-alpha-3:check (default-cli) on project
> tomcat-parent-7.0.39: Too many unapproved licenses: 1 -> [Help 1]
>
> for a mvn rat: check. Do we care?
Depending on
On May 8, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think it's probably a good time to have a new Geronimo 3 release
> (3.0.1?). We've fixed a bunch of stuff, upgraded Tomcat, OpenJPA, and
> fixed Java 7 complication issues. TCK is also looking pretty good now.
>
> Thoughts?
Sounds
On Apr 16, 2013, at 7:59 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
> I've been seeing a deluge of spam-type updates on the yoko wiki. Is there
> some sort of permission problem with that wiki that's allowing these?
FYI. The incubator-yoko wiki is no more…
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator-yoko/
"No wiki confi
On Apr 29, 2013, at 2:07 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I think there is no issue as long as you
>
> a.) prominently link to the Apache Geronimo page as origin of the info
> b.) follow the few guidelines listed in our Trademarks page
> http://apache.org/foundation/marks/
As our web site
On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> tested a bit perfs using AppClassLoader only (so it can be a bit different in
> a JavaEE or OSGi envrt)
>
> single call: URLClassLoader => 654 vs getResources => 1130 (ms but the unit
> is not important)
> 1000 calls: 5503 vs 612621
>
On Apr 17, 2013, at 3:22 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in org.apache.xbean.finder.UrlSet#getUrls we rely on META-INF (or "") to find
> jars. There are cases where it doesn't work at all (a common case where i saw
> it is when you only have META-INF/MANIFEST.MF which is consider for
On Apr 23, 2013, at 10:16 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Updating dependencies sometimes can be a lot of work. So as long as
> updating OpenJPA /. OpenEJB doesn't cause a lot headaches I'm all for
> it. But in short term I think we should be concentrating on getting a
> new 3.0 release out.
Understoo
I see there is a new OpenJPA release. I also noticed that our OpenEJB
depencency is 4.0.0-beta-1.
Any plans on updating these (or other dependencies)?
--kevan
On Apr 19, 2013, at 8:18 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> Hi Kevan,
>
> Yes, if someone could create a new branch that'd be great thought I don't
> plan to work on a lot next week.
> Kevin already created all JIRAs so I just need to submit patches.
OK, Jean-Louis:
https://svn.apache.org/repo
On Apr 16, 2013, at 8:59 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 16, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
>> Hi Rick,
>> Yes, must be.
>>
>> Is there any reason to preserve this wiki? At first, I couldn't understand
>> why I wasn't se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13635187#comment-13635187
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6449:
Great. Thanks KevIn.
I've
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-6449:
---
Component/s: Java EE 7
> Java EE 7 API jar fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13635129#comment-13635129
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6446:
One note -- flipping the logic ar
On Apr 18, 2013, at 1:40 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
> Hi Kevan,
>
> Maybe I could help on EJB 3.2 part.
That would be great. Let us know and someone could svn copy create the initial
branch.
My advise would be to start with a few small patches. Give the community a
chance to see your c
On Apr 17, 2013, at 4:57 PM, Kevin Sutter wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there any activity in the Geronimo community to create and house the API
> jar files for Java EE 7 technologies, just like we've had available in the
> past with previous spec levels? Is this work has already been started, could
> y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13633993#comment-13633993
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6446:
Working fo
On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> hi folks!
>
> In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from commons-annotation-1.2.MR2.
> Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation.
>
> Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add the
> mis
On Apr 16, 2013, at 8:53 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> Hi Rick,
> Yes, must be.
>
> Is there any reason to preserve this wiki? At first, I couldn't understand
> why I wasn't seeing the same spam. Until I realized that this is
> incubator-yoko and not the yoko wiki
Hi Rick,
Yes, must be.
Is there any reason to preserve this wiki? At first, I couldn't understand why
I wasn't seeing the same spam. Until I realized that this is incubator-yoko and
not the yoko wiki within geronimo.
Here's the current wiki -- http://geronimo.apache.org/yoko/
I think we have t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13631894#comment-13631894
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6446:
I now get the following error:
{
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13631889#comment-13631889
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6446:
This is a slightly more general
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6446?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13630284#comment-13630284
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6446:
FYI, I'm seeing the followin
On Apr 5, 2013, at 3:58 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> I've put together a release candidate for the tranql connector projects
> staged at
>
> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgtranql-016/
>
> The main purpose is to support jdbc 4. I also simplified the prepared
> statement cac
On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
> It's my understanding that we don't currently support JDBC 4 api's in 3.0.
> Are there plans to fix this? IIRC, we need a TranQL release?
Anybody looking into this?
IMO, this must be fixed prior to our next 3.0.x rele
Looks good to me. Sig/checksum, source/RAT, LICENSE/NOTICE, build…
Here's my +1
Thanks Jarek!
--kevan
On Apr 2, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to call a vote on yoko-1.4. It is a minor release that
> contains TCK related fixes (GERONIMOTCK-133, GERONIMOTCK-1
All looks good to me: sigs/checksum, source/rat, license/notice, build…
+1
--kevan
On Mar 29, 2013, at 11:15 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to call a vote on geronimo-jaxws_2.2_spec-1.2. It is a
> minor release that contains GERONIMO-6432.
>
> Source archives:
> https://re
On Apr 1, 2013, at 10:00 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> I got the same failures. But is this a real stop issue ?
A stop issue is something that fails to conform to the requirements of the ASF.
So, no…
My personal opinion is that all of our releases should build with Java 7 -- as
this the the JDK
On Apr 1, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I tired compiling Yoko (and jax-ws spec) on Java 7 and it compiled
> fine with the old (2.0) genesis.
Here are my results:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.0.2:compile (default-compile)
on projec
On Apr 1, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I tired compiling Yoko (and jax-ws spec) on Java 7 and it compiled
> fine with the old (2.0) genesis.
Hmm. Yoko failed for me on Java 7. I'll retry to confirm...
--kevan
Is there a reason why yoko hasn't moved to the new genesis plugin to enable
building with java 7?
--kevan
On Mar 29, 2013, at 11:33 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to call a vote on yoko-1.4. It is a minor release that
> contains TCK related fixes (GERONIMOTCK-133, GERONIMOT
It's my understanding that we don't currently support JDBC 4 api's in 3.0. Are
there plans to fix this? IIRC, we need a TranQL release?
--kevan
Everyone,
In recognition of his contributions to the Geronimo project, the Geronimo PMC
has invited Romain Manni-Bucau to become a committer on our project. We are
pleased to announce that he has accepted our invitation.
Please join us in congratulating Romain. Welcome!
--kevan
On Mar 15, 2013, at 8:58 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Np, thank to you for helping.
>
> Btw, with the 'what else' I meant things like a announcement mail and moving
> binaries to a download area.
> Not sure if / how this is done for such partly releases in G#.
Ah. I see. The news (http://gero
On Mar 14, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> hi folks!
>
> Time to tally the votes
>
> For genesis:
>
> +1: Jarek Gawor, Kevan Miller, David Blevins, Guillaume Nodet , Forrest Xia
> +1 (nonbinding): Romain Manni-Buccau, Mark Struberg
>
> For xbean
>
On Mar 14, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> hi folks!
>
> Time to tally the votes
>
> For genesis:
>
> +1: Jarek Gawor, Kevan Miller, David Blevins, Guillaume Nodet , Forrest Xia
> +1 (nonbinding): Romain Manni-Buccau, Mark Struberg
>
> For xbean
>
ompiling with Java 7. It compiles fine with Java 6. I
> think that's the difference of using genesis 2.0 vs 2.1.
>
> Jarek
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>> I get the following error, if I build with Java 7 on Mac OS. Do you see the
>> sa
I get the following error, if I build with Java 7 on Mac OS. Do you see the
same? Or something different?
[INFO]
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
[INFO] Tot
Here's my +1 for all 3.
Source, rat, build, license/notice -- all looked good.
--kevan
On Mar 13, 2013, at 10:56 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to call a vote on aspectjrt-1.6.8_2,
> aspectjweaver-1.6.8_2, and commons-httpclient-3.1_2.
>
> aspectjrt-1.6.8_2:
> - minor rel
Here are the Jira release notes for xbean:
Release Notes - XBean - Version 3.13
** Bug
* [XBEAN-233] - Support for RetentionPolicy.CLASS broken for ElementType
FIELD, METHOD and CONSTRUCTOR
* [XBEAN-238] - ClassNotFoundException not catch so missing classes make
AnnotationFinder scannin
On Mar 8, 2013, at 3:59 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> FYI: here is the new staging repo. Will tinker the mail soon
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-004/
Hi Mark,
I looked over the releases in the staging repo. Things look good. The only
issue that I saw was t
Thanks Mark. One favor?
Please indicate the source that is being voted on. In this case, I believe it
would be:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-004/org/apache/geronimo/genesis/genesis/2.1/genesis-2.1-source-release.zip
and
https://repository.apache.org/cont
On Mar 7, 2013, at 1:56 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> If noone objects, then I gonna roll a genesis + xbean release tonight into a
> single staging area.
Sounds good to me.
--kevan
Anybody able to work on releasing XBean? OpenEJB/TomEE is interested in seeing
a release…
--kevan
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13592285#comment-13592285
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6138:
For WAS CE support, you'l
On Feb 7, 2013, at 10:33 PM, li yanli wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You can upload the patch directly, it will be resolved status after the patch
> has been verified and committed. Only committers can submit the code.
Mark is a new Geronimo committer. I gave him the necessary karma on Jira,
yesterday.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6429?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13556341#comment-13556341
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-6429:
The change that John mentions wa
On Jan 15, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> As you all probably noticed the svnpubsub area for the website has
> been setup. I've populated it with the static and wiki content. You
> should be able to kind of preview the site by opening
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/product
On Jan 7, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> The svnpubsub dist area (item #1) for Geronimo is now setup - see [1].
> I populated it with the same artifacts that we had on
> /www/www.apache.org/dist/geronimo. Please review in case I missed
> something. I'll wait a day or so to let INFRA kno
On Jan 3, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> If there is no objections I'm going to start filing INFRA tickets to
> setup svnpubsub setup for Geronimo. Here's what I think we need:
>
> 1) svnpubsub for Geronimo distributions. Basically, svnpubsub location
> such as https://dist.apache.org/r
On Jan 1, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I found quite a few sources which have mixed tab/space policy.
>
> In the JCDI packages I now switched all indenting back to spaces only.
>
> To prevent such things I personally always enable the whitespace with a light
> grey colo
On Dec 14, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I think we need a short and long term solution. For the short term solution
> let's try Dan's approach and see if that can work for us. Otherwise, we will
> loose web site updates on the 1st. For the long term solution we can consider
> switc
All,
rsync-based updates of the geronimo web site will be frozen in January (very
soon). We must migrate to svnpubsub (and optionally CMS) in order to have a
website that we can change (seems like something we'd like to have).
For more information, see -- http://www.apache.org/dev/project-site.h
Everyone,
In recognition of his contributions to the Geronimo project, the Geronimo PMC
has invited Mark Struberg to become a committer on our project. We are pleased
to announce that he has accepted our invitation.
Please join us in congratulating Mark. Welcome!
--kevan
On Dec 6, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Jerry Maine wrote:
> I had to install the plugins running on java 6 then turn around and run it
> again with java 7.
Thanks. I was afraid of that… Hoping for something a bit better -- even
permanent… ;-)
--kevan
There have been several users reporting problems with installing Geronimo
plugins while running with Java 7. Anybody able to investigate and provide a
fix/work-around for our users? Clearly the current behavior is not good…
--kevan
On Nov 27, 2012, at 3:41 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>> I'd suggest you start working in geronimo/specs. If you can submit an
>> incremental patch or two, that would be cool.
>
>
> Hi Kevan!
>
> Well, I better just svn copy it over to owb and do the hack over there. It's
> really p
1 - 100 of 3111 matches
Mail list logo
