[jira] Commented: (AMQ-1091) add a source distro to the maven2 build

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1091?page=comments#action_37661 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-1091: --- So, shouldn't this result in a download option for source on the AMQ 4.1 download page? add a source distro to the maven2

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-961) Problem with subscription passing with network of brokers in AMQ 4.0.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-961?page=comments#action_37133 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-961: -- Thanks. I will apply this patch and try it out. Problem with subscription passing with network of brokers in AMQ 4.0.2

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-961) Problem with subscription passing with network of brokers in AMQ 4.0.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-961?page=comments#action_37134 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-961: -- This does appear to fix the problem. I'd had a similar problem with AMQ 4.0.1, reported in AMQ-776, which I had fixed. But,

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-776) ConduitBridge can malfunction when first of a set of consumers goes away

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-776?page=comments#action_37135 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-776: -- Hiram, With help from Holger Bruch on AMQ-961, this issue I think can be resolved. For AMQ 4.0.2, apply the ConduitBridge

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-957) Problem with Broker shutdown in 4.0.2

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-957?page=all ] Kevin Yaussy updated AMQ-957: - Attachment: DemandForwardingBridgeSupport.patch Problem with Broker shutdown in 4.0.2 - Key: AMQ-957

[jira] Created: (AMQ-961) Problem with subscription passing with network of brokers in AMQ 4.0.2

Problem with subscription passing with network of brokers in AMQ 4.0.2 -- Key: AMQ-961 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-961 Project: ActiveMQ Issue Type:

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-776) ConduitBridge can malfunction when first of a set of consumers goes away

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-776?page=comments#action_37081 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-776: -- Hiram, I have been very busy with some other items around here, so I've not worked on this for about a month. I'm planning

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-776) ConduitBridge can malfunction when first of a set of consumers goes away

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-776?page=comments#action_36776 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-776: -- Rob, The code for clearDownSubscriptions in DemandForwardingBridgeSupport.java is not present (empty method) in 4.0.1.

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-771) org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection::stop should not attempt to send a message over the connection.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-771?page=comments#action_36777 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-771: -- Rob, This issue is a bit more complex than I've noted above. I've been out for a week, but prior to leaving I got a version

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-776) ConduitBridge can malfunction when first of a set of consumers goes away

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-776?page=comments#action_36780 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-776: -- I'll attach a patch file for DemandForwardingBridgeSupport.java which is baselined on the 4.0.1 version. It includes the

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-776) ConduitBridge can malfunction when first of a set of consumers goes away

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-776?page=all ] Kevin Yaussy updated AMQ-776: - Attachment: DemandForwardingBridgeSupport.patch ConduitBridge can malfunction when first of a set of consumers goes away

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-776) ConduitBridge can malfunction when first of a set of consumers goes away

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-776?page=comments#action_36594 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-776: -- Any reason why clearDownSubscriptions in DemandForwardingBridgeSupport is uncoded? Or perhaps overridden in ConduitBridge?

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-776) ConduitBridge can malfunction when first of a set of consumers goes away

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-776?page=comments#action_36535 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-776: -- I found another scenario, but have not had time to discover whether it is due to problem in ConduitBridge or not. But, it seems likely:

[jira] Created: (AMQ-776) ConduitBridge can malfunction when first of a set of consumers goes away

ConduitBridge can malfunction when first of a set of consumers goes away Key: AMQ-776 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-776 Project: ActiveMQ Type: Bug Components: Broker

[jira] Created: (AMQ-770) consumer.dispatchAsync defaults to false

consumer.dispatchAsync defaults to false Key: AMQ-770 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-770 Project: ActiveMQ Type: Bug Components: JMS client Versions: 4.0, 4.0.1 Reporter: Kevin Yaussy

[jira] Created: (AMQ-771) org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection::stop should not attempt to send a message over the connection.

org.apache.activemq.broker.TransportConnection::stop should not attempt to send a message over the connection. -- Key: AMQ-771 URL:

[jira] Reopened: (AMQ-608) Change logging level of some DemandForwardingBridge log messages.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-608?page=all ] Kevin Yaussy reopened AMQ-608: -- Hiram, Very sorry that I did not look at the 4.0.1 source until the last couple days. I'd like to submit patches this time (I don't have svn, but I will

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-608) Change logging level of some DemandForwardingBridge log messages.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-608?page=all ] Kevin Yaussy updated AMQ-608: - Attachment: DemandForwardingBridgeSupport.patch FailoverTransport.patch InactivityMonitor.patch Hope this is the way to attach the

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-608) Change logging level of some DemandForwardingBridge log messages.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-608?page=all ] Kevin Yaussy updated AMQ-608: - Attachment: InactivityMonitor.patch2 Change logging level of some DemandForwardingBridge log messages.

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-657) FailoverTransport inhibits exception-listener and transport-listener

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-657?page=comments#action_36394 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-657: -- Hiram, I will test this out. Just applied the 4.0 (incubator) release to my test system the other day. Btw: when will 4.0 get out of

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-608) Change logging level of some DemandForwardingBridge log messages.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-608?page=comments#action_36395 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-608: -- Hiram, Thanks. I will use svn diff in the future. So, what is the time frame of 4.0.1? Like I commented in the other issue, when will

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-523) vm:// connections don't show in jmx info (jconsole)

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-523?page=comments#action_36396 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-523: -- Hiram, Thanks for looking. We have a monitoring GUI that we already had for our current Pub/Sub (JMS-ish) environment. When I saw that

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-443) ReliableTransport / KeepAlive algorithm does not work properly.

[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-443?page=comments#action_36397 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-443: -- Yes - and so far the 4.0 approach is working very well in this respect. ReliableTransport / KeepAlive algorithm does not work properly.

[jira] Created: (AMQ-687) Multiple durable topics don't work with network of brokers

Multiple durable topics don't work with network of brokers -- Key: AMQ-687 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-687 Project: ActiveMQ Type: Bug Components: Broker Versions: 4.0 RC 2

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-643) maxInactivityDuration does not seem to work properly

[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-643?page=comments#action_35889 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-643: -- I'm very happy with the eviction policy features. We will make *extensive* use of that (btw, we may want to implement an eviction policy at

[jira] Updated: (AMQ-608) Change logging level of some DemandForwardingBridge log messages.

[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-608?page=all ] Kevin Yaussy updated AMQ-608: - Attachment: FailoverTransport.java DemandForwardingBridgeSupport.java Just to push my luck on this one, I've attached the changes again in terms of

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-643) maxInactivityDuration does not seem to work properly

[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-643?page=comments#action_35890 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-643: -- Doh! Yes, issue resolved! maxInactivityDuration does not seem to work properly

[jira] Created: (AMQ-657) FailoverTransport inhibits exception-listener and transport-listener

FailoverTransport inhibits exception-listener and transport-listener Key: AMQ-657 URL: http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-657 Project: ActiveMQ Type: Bug Components: Connector

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-643) maxInactivityDuration does not seem to work properly

[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-643?page=comments#action_35861 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-643: -- However, that sounds like both sides would still have to explicitly make the setting, right? maxInactivityDuration does not seem to work

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-632) TaskRunnerFactory from broker is not carried along to Broker-to-Broker connections

[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-632?page=comments#action_35863 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-632: -- I'll try this on my end tomorrow after the SNAPSHOT build. TaskRunnerFactory from broker is not carried along to Broker-to-Broker

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-632) TaskRunnerFactory from broker is not carried along to Broker-to-Broker connections

[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-632?page=comments#action_35801 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-632: -- Thanks, James. My test system is experiencing problems at the moment, so I hope I can soon try out the settings as you describe. Thanks for

[jira] Commented: (AMQ-632) TaskRunnerFactory from broker is not carried along to Broker-to-Broker connections

[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-632?page=comments#action_35817 ] Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-632: -- James, The config settings on networkConnector works famously, as of the 3/17/2006 SNAPSHOT (it did not work against 3/15/2006 SNAPSHOT).

[jira] Created: (AMQ-643) maxInactivityDuration does not seem to work properly

maxInactivityDuration does not seem to work properly Key: AMQ-643 URL: http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-643 Project: ActiveMQ Type: Bug Components: Connector Versions: 4.0 M5 Environment: