Re: [VOTE] Release Yoko ORB subproject 1.0

On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 3:11 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: > All, > > I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Yoko ORB 1.0 for your review > and vote. > [...] Not enough time here to really test the artifacts and build an opinion, but here are some minor review points. * NOTICE file inside the jar

Re: [YOKO][DISCUSS] Time to create a 1.0 release?

> I think it is time to consider publishing the 1.0 release so > there's finally an official release level to work from. I currently don't > have any work items I feel need to be done before a 1.0 release can get > created. I have a number of items I think need to get improved what I'd > prefer d

Re: [YOKO] premature tools deletion?

I assume tools will also live in CXF for the IDL<->WSDL compilers. If we keep our own copy (which I think is a good idea) we need to make sure that our package name is different from theirs. I assume they will eventually use o.a.cxf.something, but currently they are not: http://svn.apache.org/viewv

Re: [YOKO]

On Jan 14, 2008 8:05 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2008, at 4:35 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > > > What cleanup steps need to be taken with the yoko code now that it's > > been made a subproject in Geronimo? The first obvious one would be > > to remove the non-core components from the trun

Re: Corba spec / IDL issues

Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote, On 12/6/2005 8:21 AM: Optimally, we would be able to take the idl files directly from OMG. They have published a set of idl files, which can be downloaded here: http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/02-07-02 . These files generally corres

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Lars Kühne wrote, On 11/17/2005 3:19 PM: On 11/17/05, *Dain Sundstrom* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: +1 Using JIRA for tracking progress of the ORB would be great. [...] I suggest you create an "Add an ORB impl

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

Kevan Miller wrote: On 11/17/05, *Dain Sundstrom* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: +1 Using JIRA for tracking progress of the ORB would be great. We already have a CORBA component, so I suggest you create an "Add an ORB implementation" issue that can be the

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote: Just to give you some direct guidance, you probably should have shot an email out to the group saying "what do you guys do for testing when more than one VM is involved" or "we have this idea for testing in more than one VM, what do you think?" You are rig

Re: idlj plugin to build Trifork ORB?

rera wrote: Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote, On 11/15/2005 1:46 AM: Lars Kühne wrote: I'm having a hard time building the Trifork ORB in sandbox/freeorb. I'm trying to follow /README-M2-BUILD.txt, but step 2 doesn't work for me. When I try to compile specs/*corba, I get geronim

idlj plugin to build Trifork ORB?

Hi, I'm having a hard time building the Trifork ORB in sandbox/freeorb. I'm trying to follow /README-M2-BUILD.txt, but step 2 doesn't work for me. When I try to compile specs/*corba, I get geronimo-spec-corba> mvn install ... The plugin 'org.codehaus.mojo:maven-idlj-plugin' does not exist [..

Re: Trifork CORBA

Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I want to extend an invitation out to all the OpenORB developers who might be interested in helping out. Lots of great work out here! I'm one of them, but I don't use Geronimo and I haven't looked at G's architecture. Some of these points have already been made in t