Re: [spec / cdi 2] bad impl for javax.enterprise.inject.se.SeContainerInitializer#newInstance?

+1 for the old pattern. Do you create a ticket for it? LieGrue, strub > Am 01.07.2017 um 14:29 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > just saw how javax.enterprise.inject.se.SeContainerInitializer#newInstance > has been implemented. I'm not sure it was based on the ref implementation b

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

Hi folks! The VOTE did pass with the following: +1: Jean-Louis Monteiro (nb), Reinhard Sandtner (nb), Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament (nb), Guillaume Nodet, Mark Struberg No -1 nor 0 (Guillaume changed his vote from 0 to +1). There was also an important discussion regarding OSGi improvements

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] geronimo-annotation_1.3 spec jar

Hi all! The VOTE has passed with the following: +1: Romain Manni-Bucau, Reinhard Sandtner (nb), Jean-Louis Monteiro (nb), Guillaume Nodet, Mark Struberg No -1 nor 0 I'll gonna follow up with the release steps. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 26.06.2017 um 22:57 schrieb Mark Struberg :

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

you could fixing the OSGi issues that'd be great. > > In addition to OWB, Meecrowave could also benefit from it. > BTW, if we could check and validate the transaction spec, that'd be fantastic. > > > Le mar. 27 juin 2017 à 14:38, Mark Struberg a écrit : > txs and pi

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

projects! txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 27.06.2017 um 14:32 schrieb Guillaume Nodet : > > Changing my vote to +1. > > And feel free to ping me when preparing a release so that I can have a look > at the OSGi stuff. > > 2017-06-27 14:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > +1 &

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

jcdi_2.0_spec/src/main/java/javax/enterprise/inject/spi/CDI.java#L54 > > I know the latter does not work on OSGi environments, it relies on TCCL. > > John > > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:38 AM Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi Guillaume! > > I totally agree, but does this re

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

gt; > -0 > > It would be nice to have all the new specs released in an OSGi compatible way > or not include OSGi support. The current state (OSGi metadata, but no way to > find the provider) is not very satisfying imho. > > 2017-06-27 11:16 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Hi!

[VOTE] geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar

Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing our geronimo-jcdi_2.0 spec jar in version 1.0 This is the API for CDI-2.0. The artifact does pass the CDI TCK and is binary compatible with the official artifact (signature comparison passed). The staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/re

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6568) Create geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved GERONIMO-6568. - Resolution: Fixed > Create geronimo-annotation_1.3_s

[VOTE] geronimo-annotation_1.3 spec jar

Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE on our version of common-annoations 1.3. We need this for CDI-2.0. The only change is that @Priority is now also applicable to methods. Please VOTE for releasing geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec The staging repo is https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orga

Re: [VOTE] Release geroniom-jaxrs_2.0 API jar

lg > reini > >> Am 17.04.2017 um 08:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : >> >> +1 >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | JavaEE Factory >> >> 2017-04-17 0:03 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : >> Hi

[ANNOUNCE] Welcome John D. Ament as new Apache Geronimo Committer

Good morning! It's my pleasure to announce that John Ament will join the Apache Geronimo team as new Committer! John is involved in many JavaEE specs and already helped us with many patches in the geronimo-specs area. John is also a part of the MicroProfile community and will help us with impr

[ANNOUNCE] Welcome Christian Schneider as new Apache Geronimo Committer

Good morning! It's my pleasure to announce that Christian Schneider will join the Apache Geronimo team as new Committer! Christian is an expert in the OSGi area and already helped us with OSGi related questions since a long time. So it's finally time to make him officially part of the community

About to release a few spec APIs

Hi Folks! I'm about to release geronimo-annotation-1.3 (only change is @Priority is now allowed on parameters as well) and jcdi-2.0. Both are used in OpenWebBeans-2.0.0, do pass the CDI TCK and the signature fits the official API jars. Please shout out if there are any objections. LieGrue, str

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6568) Create geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6568?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg updated GERONIMO-6568: Issue Type: New Feature (was: Bug) > Create geronimo-annotation_1.3_s

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6568) Create geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec

Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6568: --- Summary: Create geronimo-annotation_1.3_spec Key: GERONIMO-6568 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6568 Project: Geronimo Issue Type

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16028499#comment-16028499 ] Mark Struberg commented on GERONIMO-6553: - Wohuu, with Johns la

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16028493#comment-16028493 ] Mark Struberg commented on GERONIMO-6553: - Cool, thanks will apply now &

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16028444#comment-16028444 ] Mark Struberg commented on GERONIMO-6553: - Cool John, many thanks for

[jira] [Reopened] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg reopened GERONIMO-6553: - Heh true, we should reopen this ticket formally ;) Thanks for the patch, John! Will apply

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6566) Implement MicroProfile Config

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg updated GERONIMO-6566: Component/s: (was: common) Config > Implement MicroProfile Con

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6566) Implement MicroProfile Config

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved GERONIMO-6566. - Resolution: Fixed > Implement MicroProfile Con

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6567) Expose configuration system details via JMX

Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6567: --- Summary: Expose configuration system details via JMX Key: GERONIMO-6567 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6567 Project: Geronimo

are we d'accord to retire the Geronimo Server part?

Or do we need another formal vote? If we are all on the same boat, when, how and who is drafting the Announcement? LieGrue, strub

site cleanup

Hi folks! Can someone point me to more docs about how the G site is maintained? Would love to reorg it a bit and add info about GeronimoConfig. txs and LieGrue, strub

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] geronimo-jsonb_1.0 v 1.0 API jar

Time to tally the vote. The VOTE has passed with the following +1: Romain Manni-Bucau, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Guillaume Nodet, Reinhard Sandtner, Hendrik Saly, Mark Struberg No -1 nor +0 txs to all who voted! I'll gonna continue with the release steps. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 21

Re: [VOTE] Release geroniom-jsonp_1.1 API.jar

The VOTE passed with the following: +1 Romain Manni-Bucau, Reinhard Sandtner, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Guillaume Nodet, Hendrik Saly, Mark Struberg I'll gonna continue with the release steps. txs 2 all who voted! LieGrue, strub > Am 17.04.2017 um 00:08 schrieb Mark Struberg :

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6566) Implement MicroProfile Config

Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6566: --- Summary: Implement MicroProfile Config Key: GERONIMO-6566 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6566 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: New

Re: fresh blood

probably a good idea! txs for the input! LieGrue, strub > Am 21.04.2017 um 18:52 schrieb David Jencks : > > I’d suggest it go in components next to the tx manager and jaspi. > > david jencks > >> On Apr 21, 2017, at 9:39 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >>

Re: fresh blood

project lost in there own branch > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | JavaEE Factory > > 2017-04-18 23:33 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > or rather recycled blood ;) > > I finally want to bring the Microprofile Config prop

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-jsonb_1.0 v 1.0 API jar

schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi! > > Please VOTE on releasing version 1.0 of the Geronimo JSONB 1.0 API (JSON > Binding). > > The staging repo is > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1033/ > > The source package can be found at: &

[VOTE] geronimo-jsonb_1.0 v 1.0 API jar

Hi! Please VOTE on releasing version 1.0 of the Geronimo JSONB 1.0 API (JSON Binding). The staging repo is https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1033/ The source package can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1032/org

Re: [VOTE] fold the various Geronimo subproject mailing lists to the main lists

self https://lists.apache.org/list.html?secur...@geronimo.apache.org txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 21.04.2017 um 15:36 schrieb Alan Cabrera : > > >> On Apr 21, 2017, at 6:24 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> We currently have quite a few list

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6564) Move the JSONB api from Johnzon to Geronimo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15978738#comment-15978738 ] Mark Struberg commented on GERONIMO-6564: - patch applied, thanks Chris

[VOTE] fold the various Geronimo subproject mailing lists to the main lists

Hi! We currently have quite a few lists which have very low traffic. My findings are a result of browsing lists.a.o. user@g.a.o -> merge into dev@g.a.o We only had 2 messages in the whole last year! xbean-dev@g.a.o -> move to dev@g.a.o xbean-user@g.a.o -> move to dev@g.a.o xbean-scm@g.a.o -

Re: javamail 1.4 release?

+1 for a release. LieGrue, strub > Am 19.04.2017 um 09:52 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > some tomee users are blocked cause of a bug in javamail I fixed (thanks to a > patch, yeah :)), yesterday. > > Any plan to start a release? I'll be short before end of next month so if > a

fresh blood

or rather recycled blood ;) I finally want to bring the Microprofile Config proposal back to where it belongs - the ASF! I've proposed this code a year ago but didn't push further when it got trash talked and side pulled with mostly unrelated stuff. So here it is again finally! The sources are

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6564) Move the JSONB api from Johnzon to Geronimo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved GERONIMO-6564. - Resolution: Fixed > Move the JSONB api from Johnzon to Geron

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6564) Move the JSONB api from Johnzon to Geronimo

Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6564: --- Summary: Move the JSONB api from Johnzon to Geronimo Key: GERONIMO-6564 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6564 Project: Geronimo

[VOTE] Release geroniom-jsonp_1.1 API.jar

Hi! Please VOTE on releasing version 1.0 of the Geronimo JSONP 1.1 API. The staging repo is https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1031/ The source package can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1031/org/apache/geronimo

[VOTE] Release geroniom-jaxrs_2.0 API jar

Hi! Please VOTE on releasing version 1.0 of the Geronimo JAX-RS 2.0 API. The staging repo is https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1030/ The source package can be found at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1030/org/apache/geronim

Re: Discuss: Move Geronimo to Attic

l with your work. > > We could still keep the specs around. I see no harm in that. > > > Regards, > Alan > > > >> On Mar 24, 2017, at 8:55 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >> Of course we do not have a huge community. But a very long lasting one. And >> th

Re: Discuss: Move Geronimo to Attic

> > If we want to continue the project, demonstrate the community that is needed > for the project to continue. As I stated previously, a good starting point: > create a new charter for the project, identify active PMC members/committers, > and obtain board approval. > > On S

Re: Merging old mailing lists

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 12.03.2017 um 19:41 schrieb Alan Cabrera : > > I’m thinking that, regardless of this project’s direction, the following > mailing lists should be merged into Geronimo’s existing mailing lists: > • servicemix-...@geronimo.apache.org > • xbean-...@geronimo.apac

Re: Discuss: Move Geronimo to Attic

t the existing JEE-related >> OSS communities out there and ask “what need are they not fulfilling?” >> >> That would answer passersby’s questions of “why would I be interested in >> this project?” >> >> That would be a slam dunk to present to the ASF board, “Geron

Re: Discuss: Move Geronimo to Attic

lex Karasulu : > > I think more important than whether or not JEE is popular (or whatever along > those lines), are the questions about community health and is the PMC still > capable of fulfilling its duties. > > My 2 cents, > --Alex > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 12:08 PM,

Re: Discuss: Move Geronimo to Attic

that most of the community has moved on and there is little activity. If >> those that are still active want to keep going then God’s speed. >> >> Matt Hogstrom >> m...@hogstrom.org >> +1-919-656-0564 >> PGP Key: 0x90ECB270 >> Facebook LinkedIn Twitter &

Re: Discuss: Move Geronimo to Attic

hallenge but still a real need. >> >> Geronimo AppService not being really developped or maintained anymore I can >> see it being frozen (attic or not is a detail IMO) but other parts are still >> a very good fit for Geronimo community IMO. >> >> >> Roma

Re: Discuss: Move Geronimo to Attic

I see no lack of interest in Java EE to be honest. Of course Microservices are currently spilled high on the hype cycle, but that will quickly blow up imo. MS architecture is only very good for a certain kind of application. For most business apps the granularity is way too fine grain and the mis

let's use the Help-Wanted page for adding JavaDoc to our specs?

Hi folks! What about using the Apache Help-Wanted page and doing a few tweets about beefing up our geronimo-specs docs? Do you think that's worth a try? LieGrue, strub

Re: More on Yoko

should be fine. LieGrue, strub > Am 17.01.2017 um 00:36 schrieb David Jencks : > > As far as my experiments have shown, I can’t modify the git commit messages > to include the jira issue numbers I created to match the commits without > completely losing the git branch structure. > > Therefor

Re: [DICSUSS] the future direction of the Apache Geronimo project

ich components specifically are you thinking of? > > david jencks > >> On Dec 15, 2016, at 1:57 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: >> >> Hi folks! >> >> There have been some thoughts about resurrecting activity on the Geronimo >> AppServer. >> So imo the

[DICSUSS] the future direction of the Apache Geronimo project

Hi folks! There have been some thoughts about resurrecting activity on the Geronimo AppServer. So imo the first step is to find a spot which makes sense. Software doesn't get built just for fun. Of course if no fun is involved then a project is doomed as well. But otoh if it doesn't get used t

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] release geronimo-flava 2.3

Thanks Alan and Romain! The VOTE passes with the following: +1 Alan, Romain, Mark No -1 nor 0. Gonna publish the artifacts. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 05.12.2016 um 00:07 schrieb Alan Cabrera : > > +1 > > > Regards, > Alan > >> On Nov 22, 2016, at 3:32 AM, M

Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-flava 2.3

ping, anyone up for the vote? txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 22.11.2016 um 14:18 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | JavaEE Factory > > 2016-11-22 12:32 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : >

[jira] [Commented] (GERONIMO-6558) API for JSR-374 JSON-P 1.1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15691297#comment-15691297 ] Mark Struberg commented on GERONIMO-6558: - patch applied, txs Reinhard! &

Re: [VOTE] Release transaction manager 3.1.4

Just saw that Guillaume IS a geronimo PMC member. Thus we have 3 binding +1 and no -1 txs 2 all who voted! I gonna continue with the release. LieGrue, strub > Am 22.11.2016 um 12:25 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > folks, we still need another VOTE! > > txs and LieGrue, >

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6558) API for JSR-374 JSON-P 1.1

Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6558: --- Summary: API for JSR-374 JSON-P 1.1 Key: GERONIMO-6558 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6558 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: New

[VOTE] release geronimo-flava 2.3

Hi folks! Please VOTE on the release of geronimo-flava-2.3. We need this for every Java8 based spec jar. Here is the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1029/ The source release can be found here https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/or

Re: [VOTE] Release transaction manager 3.1.4

folks, we still need another VOTE! txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 10.11.2016 um 11:29 schrieb Guillaume Nodet : > > The release is staged at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1028 > > The only change is the fix for GERONIMO-4576: > https://issues.apache.or

[DISCUSS] releasing the genesis project

This is needed to get genesis-Java8-flava Will start it this afternoon. LieGrue, strub

Re: [VOTE] Release transaction manager 3.1.4

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 10.11.2016 um 12:09 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1, very impatient to upgrade TomEE! > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | JavaEE Factory > > 2016-11-10 11:29 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Nodet : > The release is staged at > http

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6556) geronimo-jcdi AnnotationLiteral could cache the hashCode and toString values

Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6556: --- Summary: geronimo-jcdi AnnotationLiteral could cache the hashCode and toString values Key: GERONIMO-6556 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6556

Re: More on Yoko

Hi David, Alan! I think there is not (yet) wide adoption of yoko. So if the iCLAs are on file then I see no problem to simply import this work to svn as well. We can of course also request a git repo for yoko and import the current work over. I can assist in getting the git repo started. But

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 of the 1.1 spec version

*bump* we need 1 more review... txs and LieGrue, strub > On Monday, 10 October 2016, 9:02, Mark Struberg wrote: > > * builds fine > * rat passes > * LICENSE and NOTICE file ok > * TCK passed in BVal. > * sha1 fine > * sig fine. > > +1 > > LieGrue, >

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 of the 1.1 spec version

* builds fine * rat passes * LICENSE and NOTICE file ok * TCK passed in BVal. * sha1 fine * sig fine. +1 LieGrue, strub > Am 06.10.2016 um 14:37 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi again, > > I'd still like to release a 1.0 of our validation jar. > > After having checked with gunnar the jar

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 of the 1.1 spec version

it’s on my list, was just busy. LieGrue, strub > Am 09.10.2016 um 09:21 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > up (this is not the cancelled vote, wonder if the lack of feedback is due to > the confusion so pinging in case it is) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Wordpress Blog

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6555) improve documentation of our validation-1.1 spec api

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved GERONIMO-6555. - Resolution: Fixed constraints and a few other important classes now got documented

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API

spec == validation-1.1 artifact == 1.0 ;) LieGrue, strub > Am 06.10.2016 um 14:06 schrieb John D. Ament : > > The release says "1.1" but the email says "1.0". I'm assuming this is in > fact the 1.1 release? > > John > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:55 AM Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > Hi guys

[jira] [Updated] (GERONIMO-6555) improve documentation of our validation-1.1 spec api

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6555?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg updated GERONIMO-6555: Summary: improve documentation of our validation-1.1 spec api (was: improve

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6555) improve documentation of our valication-1.1 spec api

Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6555: --- Summary: improve documentation of our valication-1.1 spec api Key: GERONIMO-6555 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6555 Project: Geronimo

[xbean] do we already support jmod in xbean-scanner?

Hi! Do we already support the new Java9 jmod file format in xbean-scanner? JMODs are basically zip files with a structure of: /classes /bin /conf /security /native LieGrue, strub

Re: PR Merge?

No it's not _that_ easy. Simply using a WeakHashMap wont work. You also have to wrap the value in a WeakReference. Otherwise the value in the Map will prevent the CL from being garbage collected. A common pitfall I've seen s often implemented the wrong way ;) LieGrue, strub > On Tuesday

Re: PR Merge?

That particular concern can easily get addressed via this trick [1]: protected static Map> configs = Collections.synchronizedMap(new WeakHashMap>()); LieGrue, strub [1] https://github.com/struberg/javaConfig/blob/master/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/config/DefaultConfigProvider.ja

Re: PR Merge?

>>>>> >>>>> I didnt design the API but it is exactly the case and I would even go >>>>> further, it is a dangerous API cause it doesnt expose a lifecycle for >>>>> spec entities which can break apps in higher spec. Back to our current

Re: PR Merge?

I’m with Clebert here. The current implementation in json-1.0 is a manual java.util.ServiceLoader (for java5 backward compat I guess). But it does not do a loop and tries to find the ‚closest’ one, but just takes the first service it finds. Consider now you have 2 impls. The first in the tomca

[jira] [Resolved] (GERONIMO-6553) CDI 2.0 Spec JAR Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Struberg resolved GERONIMO-6553. - Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Mark Struberg txs for the patch, committed! >

Re: Configuration for Java SE and Java EE JSR

> Am 15.07.2016 um 09:31 schrieb Werner Keil : > > Tamaya will know best, if it tolerates a fork of > Geronimo in the way Mark created it. Wow! Dude, you got something horribly wrong. That stuff is in no way a fork of Tamaya. It’s just the core bits I wrote in DeltaSpike configuration. In De

Re: Configuration for Java SE and Java EE JSR

33, "Oliver B. Fischer" >> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>>> I a little bit confused. As I know our common goal is to establish a >>>>> configuration JSR based on Tamaya. I wouldn't like to see here a race >> for >>>>&

Re: Configuration for Java SE and Java EE JSR

Tamaya is nowadays quite far from a smallish solution but a very complex system. LieGrue, Strub > Am 15.07.2016 um 00:20 schrieb John D. Ament : > > Doesn't this overlap with another project you've been involved with, Tamaya? > > > On Jul 14, 2016 6:10 PM, "

Configuration for Java SE and Java EE JSR

Hi folks! I’ve started to extract the configuration work I’ve done in OWB, MyFaces and DeltaSpike into an own little project. For the MyFaces and DeltaSpike parts I got help from ASF member Gerhard Petracek. My goal is to establish an own JSR for configuration. So far it consists of 2 classes

Re: JCache dependency

ping me on irc #openejb so we can divide the work. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 11.05.2016 um 08:40 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Is this still needed? > If so I can run the release today. > > LieGrue, > Strub > >> Am 30.03.2016 um 09:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : &g

Re: JCache dependency

Is this still needed? If so I can run the release today. LieGrue, Strub > Am 30.03.2016 um 09:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Just checked and our spec jar passes sigtest. Not sure for this week > but think we can run a vote next one if nobody objects - don't > hesitate to ping if nothing ha

Re: geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.9.0 release?

Do we have own tests? If so, let's go for it. If it is used in TomEE and there are TCKs then it did pass the TCK. Otherwise we would have heard about it ;) txs and LieGrue, strub > On Monday, 2 May 2016, 18:01, Hendrik Dev wrote: > > i worked a while ago on 1.4 and 1.5. If i recall correct

Re: Slack channel?

hmm, no bot support, commercial, not really open, ... Great for commercial projects, but imo not that good for an OSS project. LieGrue, strub > On Saturday, 30 April 2016, 20:01, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > wdyt? I love Slack. > > > Regards, > Alan >

Re: JCache dependency

+1 Lg, Strub > Am 30.03.2016 um 09:30 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Just checked and our spec jar passes sigtest. Not sure for this week > but think we can run a vote next one if nobody objects - don't > hesitate to ping if nothing happens ;). > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog |

Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.5 release

done that now ;) +1 LieGrue, strub > Am 29.11.2015 um 00:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Up, changes are minor compared to last release. Should be fast to review guys. > > Le 23 nov. 2015 11:51, "Romain Manni-Bucau" a écrit : > Hi, > > Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.5.

Re: [VOTE] geronimo-javamail_1.4 1.9.0-alpha-2

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 27.09.2015 um 06:03 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera : > > +1 > > Tag builds fine, signatures and hashes match. > > > Regards, > Alan > >> On Sep 23, 2015, at 10:51 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I'd like to release geronimo javamail 1.4, main reason

Re: [VOTE] XBean 4.4 release

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 10.09.2015 um 07:05 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 09/10/2015 06:50 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.4. >> >> Here is the staging repo: >> https://repository.apache.or

[jira] [Created] (GERONIMO-6546) add geronimo-jcdi-2.0 EDR package

Mark Struberg created GERONIMO-6546: --- Summary: add geronimo-jcdi-2.0 EDR package Key: GERONIMO-6546 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6546 Project: Geronimo Issue Type

Re: Board report time 2015-07

looks fine. LieGrue, strub > Am 09.07.2015 um 07:11 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera : > > Here's the report that I sent to the board: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board+Report+-+2015-07+-+July > > If I missed something please let me know directly. I’m sorry

Re: Geronimo dependencies on JDK-Internal APIs

I did the check for * specs - all OK * xbean - some problems did show up: ~/develop/java/apache/geronimo/xbean/trunk$>find . -name *.jar | xargs /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.8.0_45.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/jdeps -P -jdkinternals Warning: Invalid classname or pathname not exist: ./xbea

Re: [VOTE] release jpa 2.1 spec jar in 1.0-alpha-1

BUMP… > Am 19.06.2015 um 01:56 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > up, anyone else to vote? > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber > > 2015-06-18 23:53 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > hehe, so here is my +1 > > I’ve us

Re: [VOTE] release jpa 2.1 spec jar in 1.0-alpha-1

; > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber > > 2015-06-18 9:46 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg : > Plz gimme a few days more to review. > Trying to do it tonight… > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 15.06.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Romain Manni-Bu

Re: [VOTE] release jpa 2.1 spec jar in 1.0-alpha-1

Plz gimme a few days more to review. Trying to do it tonight… LieGrue, strub > Am 15.06.2015 um 19:03 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi > > I'd like to call a vote to release our jpa 2.1 api jar. > > Here are: > - the staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgap

Re: [VOTE] Reease Transaction Manager 3.1.3

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 09.06.2015 um 09:24 schrieb Guillaume Nodet : > > I've uploaded a 3.1.3 release of the transaction manager component at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1020 > > This fixes the following issues: > • GERONIMO-6543: Aries/Gero

Re: Servlet 3.1 JAR

As usually the servlet spec apis get developed in tomcat and then copied over to geronimo after it is reasonably stable. LieGrue, strub > Am 04.06.2015 um 16:29 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > that is what we did in tomee and think it is good to avoid to have N times > the same jar accross ap

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release XBean-4.3

Hi! Time to tally the VOTE. The VOTE has passed with the following: +1: Romain, Jean-Louis (nb), Guillaume, Jean-Baptiste (nb), Mark Txs to all who voted! Gonna propagate the artifacts. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 31.05.2015 um 10:54 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi! > &

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean-4.3

ping, we need 1 more vote… LieGrue, strub > Am 31.05.2015 um 10:54 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi! > > Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.3. > > Here is the staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1019/ > &g

[VOTE] Release XBean-4.3

Hi! Please VOTE for the release of Apache XBean-4.3. Here is the staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1019/ The source distribution can be found here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1019/org/apache/xbean/xbean/4.

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >