+1
On 27 Apr 2010, at 00:04, David Jencks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've staged a release candidate for ActiveMQ 5.3.2. The main driver for this
> is to get the osgi version range fixes into a release usable by the upcoming
> geronimo 3.0 milestone.
>
> The changes since the recent 5.3.1:
>
> merging
+1
On Sep 21, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Freeman Fang wrote:
Hi All,
I have uploaded a version of ServiceMix 3.1.2 for you to review. See
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SM/ServiceMix+3.1.2
for all the links and release notes.
[ ] +1 Release ServiceMix 3.1.2
[ ] ± 0
[ ] -1 Do not release Ser
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1082?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-1082.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.2.0
Fixed by SVN revision 499798
> Improve Kaha freeL
we are moving the servers at the moment - apologies for any
inconvenience
cheers,
Rob
On 25 Jan 2007, at 08:56, Rossmanith, Philipp wrote:
Hi,
When trying to access the Confluence-Wiki for editing pages, I get a:
HTTP Status 404 - /confluence/pages/createpage.action
type Status report
eases
first - before GA
cheers,
Rob Davies
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-1077.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.2.0
resolved by SVN revision 499032
> Bug in ST
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-1077:
---
Assignee: Rob Davies
> Bug in STOMP transport unsubscr
thx for spotting this - the correction will be in the next major release
cheers,
Rob
On 22 Jan 2007, at 23:32, eguanlao wrote:
Will the misspelled word, "negociation" be changed to "negotiation"
in the
next release? There should be no spelling errors.
javax.jms.JMSException: Wire format ne
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-1020.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.2.0
This is fixed by the default use of cursors and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-1020:
---
Assignee: Rob Davies
> Slow consumer terminally blocks both client and bro
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-879?page=all ]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-879:
--
Assignee: Rob Davies
> Destination statistics message count is not decremented after message expi
sounds a good idea!
+1
On 19 Dec 2006, at 09:42, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'd like to release jencks 2.0 and servicemix 3.1, but I'm a little
reluctant
to do so because both make heavy use of the ActiveMQ resource adapter,
which is unfortunately quite unreliable in 4.1.0, mainly because of
th
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-979?page=all ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-979.
Resolution: Duplicate
this is a duplicate of: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-920
> Allow NetworkConnections to bi-directio
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-920?page=all ]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-920:
--
Assignee: Rob Davies
> Two TCP connection requirement for bidirectional message f
interesting - it appears that the paged in size of messages should
also take into account the outstanding memory usage
Do you fancy raising a jira issue for this ?: http://
issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ
cheers,
rob
On 19 Nov 2006, at 19:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using the store
like it! I guess it's already implemented by now :)
On 16 Nov 2006, at 09:01, James Strachan wrote:
Saw an interesting blog post today...
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/guruwons/archive/2006/11/
sending_large_f.html
As I mentioned on the comments, I'd like to extend this a little to
support b
about time :) -
+1
On 15 Nov 2006, at 16:48, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi folks,
How do you guys feel about switching the minimum run time requirement
for ActiveMQ 4.2 to be Java 5?? I'm itching to do this since Java 5
has a much better set of concurrent implementation.
We can keep the 4.1.x bra
+1
On 17 Oct 2006, at 21:38, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 10/16/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to start the release process for 3.0.1.
The list of bugs fixed in 3.0.1 is available at
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?
view=&decorator=printable&star
+1
On 17 Oct 2006, at 14:45, Philip Dodds wrote:
+1
On 10/16/06, Grant McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me too
-Original Message-
From: Ramon Buckland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 October 2006 9:54 AM
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE]
+1
On 26 Sep 2006, at 14:30, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Some copyright header file issues were found in the 3rd release
candidate of the
4.0.2 build. I have cut and RC 4 of the 4.0.2 build with the fixes
and it's available here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC4/
mav
+1
On 8 Sep 2006, at 14:53, Hiram Chirino wrote:
This is the first independently released version of the ActiveMQ maven
plugins. These are the maven plugins that the ActiveMQ build requires
to build.
You can checkout the binary build here:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-876?page=comments#action_36941 ]
Rob Davies commented on AMQ-876:
Hi Vadim,
I couldn't reproduce this - and as I'd fixed something like this a few weeks
ago - I'd assumed it was f
+1
On 8 Sep 2006, at 14:53, Hiram Chirino wrote:
This is the first independently released version of the ActiveMQ maven
plugins. These are the maven plugins that the ActiveMQ build requires
to build.
You can checkout the binary build here:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repositor
I'm favour of doing this! - great idea!
On 8 Sep 2006, at 00:02, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Looking at this thread:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--approve-the-m1-release-of-Trinidad%27s-
Maven-plugins-tf2180114.html
It looks the trinidad just went through something similar and they
just did a mvn de
+1 from me!
cheers,
Rob
On 5 Sep 2006, at 15:47, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Everybody,
The ActiveMQ project has been growing tremendously and our source tree
now has many modules that are at different stages of development.
Furthermore, we require multiple build systems and platforms to build
all
go for it!
+1
cheers,
Rob Davies
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
On 5 Sep 2006, at 06:38, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Howdy Folks,
In the interest of making the kaha.impl package a little easier to
grok, I was think that perhaps we split it up into a kaha.impl.data,
kaha.impl.index, and
looks good to me!
On 1 Sep 2006, at 16:51, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Howdy Folks, here is my first stab at septemeber status report..
please let me know if something needs to be added/changed:
The ActiveMQ community continues to grow as evidenced by the mailing
list volumes. Each month mailing lis
+1 to that!
On 31 Aug 2006, at 18:25, Hiram Chirino wrote:
I'm 100% behind making activeio an optional module. I'll start
working on moving some core classes that are in activeio to activemq
so that it is not needed to run. Right now the only real
functionality that it provides that is optiona
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-877?page=all ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-877.
Resolution: Fixed
> Patch: refactoring to allow alternative (using different storage interface)
> Destinations implement
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-877?page=all ]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-877:
--
Assignee: Rob Davies (was: james strachan)
> Patch: refactoring to allow alternative (using different storage interface)
> Destinations implement
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-877?page=comments#action_36880 ]
Rob Davies commented on AMQ-877:
it does look like the patch is slightly out of sync - could you re-generate
against head and re-attach ?
> Patch: refactoring
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-877?page=all ]
Rob Davies updated AMQ-877:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.1
> Patch: refactoring to allow alternative (using different storage interface)
> Destinations implement
Somebody needed to take ownership and then assign a fix schedule for
it (done)
cheers,
Rob
On 17 Aug 2006, at 02:01, Fateev, Maxim wrote:
I've submitted a patch at Friday against 4.x: http://
issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-877
But it doesn't show up in the list of outstanding issue
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-877?page=all ]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-877:
--
Assignee: Rob Davies
> Patch: refactoring to allow alternative (using different storage interface)
> Destinations implement
+1
On 15 Aug 2006, at 21:42, Brian McCallister wrote:
+1
-Brian
On Aug 8, 2006, at 1:35 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Some NOTICE file issues were found in the 2nd release candidate of
the
4.0.2 build. I have cut and RC 3 of the 4.0.2 build with the fixes
and it's available here:
http://peop
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-870?page=all ]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-870:
--
Assignee: Rob Davies
> Broker fails to deliver messages after restart
> --
>
>
Lingo's JMX over JMS was designed for this case - allowing easy
aggregation of MBean Servers - but allowing them to be viewed as one
logical MBean.
Or if you want to a little bit more generic - mx4j can allow you to
do aggregation (though that would all be client side)
On 10 Aug 2006, at 1
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-857?page=all ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-857.
Fix Version/s: 4.0.3
(was: 4.1)
Resolution: Fixed
> Make kaha DB file size configura
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-861?page=comments#action_36745 ]
Rob Davies commented on AMQ-861:
Are you sure there isn't any oprhaned messages from your test case - e.g. a
messages sent back to a QueueRequestor that had c
+1
On 8 Aug 2006, at 21:35, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Some NOTICE file issues were found in the 2nd release candidate of the
4.0.2 build. I have cut and RC 3 of the 4.0.2 build with the fixes
and it's available here:
http://people.apache.org/~chirino/incubator-activemq-4.0.2-RC3/
maven1/incubato
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-776?page=comments#action_36744 ]
Rob Davies commented on AMQ-776:
Hi Kevin,
not sure I understood the last comment ? :) - clearDownSubscriptions in
DemandForwardingBridgeSupport clears the
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-776?page=all ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-776.
Fix Version/s: 4.0.3
Resolution: Fixed
> ConduitBridge can malfunction when first of a set of consumers goes a
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-872?page=all ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-872.
Resolution: Fixed
if TransportServer is vm - don't initialize Inactivity Monitor
> Don't monitor activity on
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-857?page=all ]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-857:
--
Assignee: Rob Davies
> Make kaha DB file size configurable
> ---
>
> Key: AMQ-857
>
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-845?page=all ]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-845:
--
Assignee: Rob Davies
> Sending messages to a topic with an inactive durable subscription will hang
> pro
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-804?page=all ]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-804:
--
Assignee: Rob Davies
> Use of Temporary Destinations over broker networks can cause the network
> bridges
+1 - sounds good to me
On 11 Jul 2006, at 16:42, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Folks.
In 4.1 we added a patch that add support of handling large string
values ( >
32k ) in map messages. See:
http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-788
I just wanted to see if you guys think we should backpor
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-755?page=all ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-755:
Fix Version: 4.0.2
Resolution: Fixed
I've added a test case to demonstrate this working:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-716?page=all ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-716:
Fix Version: 4.0.1
Resolution: Fixed
optimizeAcknowledge now off by default
> message is read from queue but not remo
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-716?page=all ]
Rob Davies reassigned AMQ-716:
--
Assign To: Rob Davies
> message is read from queue but not removed
> --
>
> Key: AMQ-716
>
+1
cheers,
Rob
On 16 May 2006, at 18:31, James Strachan wrote:
We've had the 4.0 release cut for a little while and we've tested it
out and it seems to be fine and to comply with the various release
requirements (notice file, incubator disclaimers, license files etc)
http://people.apache.org/
mply
that whatever changes you make will be swappable with existing
code? Are there any design documents that we can review in order
to understand how your improvements will affect our goals and/or
meet our needs?
Thanks,
Chris
-Original Message-----
From: Rob Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
+1
On 18 Apr 2006, at 14:04, Hiram Chirino wrote:
+1
On 4/18/06, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/12/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lets try redo RC3 quick before anyone notices :)
+1
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-661?page=all ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-661:
Resolution: Won't Fix
Unfortunately Apache ActiveMQ is not the right forum for LogicBlaze fuse.
Please re-direct any support requests to LogicBlaze dir
[ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-660?page=all ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-660:
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version: 4.0
code looks good - thanks Fan
> Change the org.apache.activemq.network.jms package, so both inbound and
> outbound re
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-683?page=all ]
Rob Davies resolved AMQ-683:
Fix Version: 4.0
(was: 4.0 RC3)
Resolution: Fixed
No memory leaks currently found
> Memory leak in ManagedRegionBro
+1
cheers,
Rob
On 3 Apr 2006, at 17:19, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Guys,
This RC1 failed to pass incubator approval. There was a small issue
with some of the logging message produced on start up. So I've done a
new RC2 release from trunk and has all the latest bug fixes.
I've posted it here:
Hi Ben,
that's great! I didn't see the attachments - can you send them again ?
cheers,
Rob
On 1 Mar 2006, at 21:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've modified the DestinationMarshaller,
DefaultDestinationMarshaller, and
DefaultClusterFactory to use "Session.createTopic(String
destinationName
ote:
On Feb 5, 2006, at 1:29 PM, Rob Davies wrote:
The way this 'debate' has continued has been very embarrassing -
It just makes me wonder why anyone would consider donating code to
Apache in the future ...
Because we care enough to have the debate. If anyone wants silenc
The way this 'debate' has continued has been very embarrassing -
It just makes me wonder why anyone would consider donating code to
Apache in the future ...
On 5 Feb 2006, at 21:03, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
James Strachan wrote:
We have received the generous donation of a complete and w
+1
Rob Davies
On 2 Feb 2006, at 16:22, James Strachan wrote:
We have received the generous donation of a complete and working
BPE engine to the ServiceMix project...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-servicemix-dev/
200602.mbox/%
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the contributor has
+1
cheers.
Rob
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
The XBean project has voted to donate all of the code located at
https://svn.codehaus.org/xbean (view with fisheye http://
cvs.codehaus.org/viewrep/xbean) to Apache Geronimo. The completed
IP clearance check list can be found here https://svn.code
n that project, just as
Twister was made to become part of that?
Sanjiva.
On Thu, 2006-02-02 at 11:02 +, Rob Davies wrote:
Hi Cory,
just been walking through the code - looks very well put together -
this will really enhance Apache ServiceMix - so I hope will quickly
be accepted!
cheers,
Hi Cory,
just been walking through the code - looks very well put together -
this will really enhance Apache ServiceMix - so I hope will quickly
be accepted!
cheers,
Rob
On 1 Feb 2006, at 19:20, cory wrote:
Hi,
The ServiceMix project provides a good JBI platform but its currently
lack
n JMS -> ActiveMQ and outbound
ActiveMQ -> JMS.
The JMS specification states that a JMS message provider should be
able to convert a foreign JMS Message if one is used - so this
interface is only there if special marshaling is required.
cheers,
Rob
On 1 Feb 2006, at 12:55, Rob Davies
65 matches
Mail list logo
