Re: Is there possible for 1.7.0 release ?

2011-07-10 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@axis.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@axis.apache.org -- Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. Founder, Director Chief Scientist; Lanka Software Foundation; http

Re: CORBA ported from OpenEJB 2

2007-02-11 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
be a really dumb question .. but I'll ask anyway :). Is the OpenEJB CORBA code an alternative to Yoko? I thought Yoko also implemented IIOP etc.. Thanks, Sanjiva. -- Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. Founder Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/ Founder, Chairman CEO; WSO2, Inc

Re: CORBA ported from OpenEJB 2

2007-02-11 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
is that every ORB is different. The only ORB we guarantee this code works with is Yoko. Ah got it. Muchos gracias! Sanjiva. -- Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D. Founder Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/ Founder, Chairman CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/ Director; Open Source

Re: Powered by logo

2006-03-24 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 16:46 +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Hossam Karim has kindly contributed some logos for ServiceMix. Thanks ! You can found them at http://docs.codehaus.org/display/SM/Logo The original idea was to have some Powered by ServiceMix logo and these are somewhat different from

Re: [jira] Resolved: (SM-149) Clustering should be done per endpoint instead of per component

2006-03-09 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
I have a dumb question .. why are these messages coming from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Shouldn't they come from something @apache.org? Sanjiva. On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 10:40 -0800, Guillaume Nodet (JIRA) wrote: [ http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/SM-149?page=all ] Guillaume Nodet

Re: Any chance of an official Axis 1.4 Release?

2006-02-22 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Sorry for the late response. On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 11:13 +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Why such a restriction ? Because ServiceMix is a project under incubation at ASF. That means its not an official product of the ASF and as such has to be made clear that its not. If you put it in as part of

Re: Ode Proposal (Sybase BPEL engine donation))

2006-02-15 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 15:56 +, James Strachan wrote: Dims Sanjiva Given your arguments that the Sybase BPEL donation should be in a new podling rather than part of ServiceMix - I wonder if you'd like to join us in the ODE proposal then we can have a united Apache community with

Re: timing on need for JAX-WS and JAX-B support

2006-02-14 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 11:16 -0800, David Blevins wrote: I could use jaxb support now. I'd like to use it instead of castor or xmlbeans for marshalling deployment descriptors -- or rather with castor or xmlbeans if either of them implement jaxb. We've done our own partial schema to Java

timing on need for JAX-WS and JAX-B support

2006-02-13 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Hi Guys, Can you give an indication of when you expect to go for J2EE 1.5 certification and hence require JAX-WS and JAX-B support from Axis2? Getting some indication of the timing will help us prioritize and target it to a specific version of Axis2. (We're not putting it into 1.0; hence the

Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project

2006-02-03 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Hi James, We're not sucking in another project. Its a contribution of code only. How is this any different than has already happened on Geronimo, Agila (twister), Harmony etc? Geronimo is not an incubating project and hence can bring more stuff in. The Agila/Twister merger was done thru

Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project

2006-02-03 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
I'm going to remove my original -1 from this thread and vote +1 for it. My apologies for helping to create this major ruckus. This type of heated discussion does not help build communities and cross community interactions that would benefit all of us in many ways. That is especially so because

Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project

2006-02-03 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Absolutely -1: The first time I ever saw any of this topic was Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:20:32 -0700 (Thu, 01:20 LKT) and now at Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:22:28 + (22:22 LKT) you want to have a vote on it? You've GOT to be kidding. Also, how is it that a project under incubation can start sucking in

Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project

2006-02-03 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Hi James, We're not sucking in another project. Its a contribution of code only. How is this any different than has already happened on Geronimo, Agila (twister), Harmony etc? Geronimo is not an incubating project and hence can bring more stuff in. The Agila/Twister merger was done thru

Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project

2006-02-03 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
I'm going to remove my original -1 from this thread and vote +1 for it. My apologies for helping to create this major ruckus. This type of heated discussion does not help build communities and cross community interactions that would benefit all of us in many ways. That is especially so because

Re: [servicemix-dev] WS-Notifications Plans

2005-12-20 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 23:10 +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote: In svn head is a fully fonctional implentation WS-Notification 1.3 Public Review Draft 1 from 07 July 2005 which support: * pull style notifications * demand based publishing * xpath filtering This component also contains a

Re: [servicemix-dev] WS-Notifications Plans

2005-12-20 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 00:05 +0100, Guillaume Nodet wrote: They are redirected to [EMAIL PROTECTED] OK .. is there any reason why they can't/shouldn't be sent to -dev? Sanjiva.

Re: [VOTE] David Blevins as Axis committer (Re: Axis 1.4 Final Branch)

2005-12-13 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 03:41 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Folks, Can we please vote David as committer to take care of Axis 1.x. Here's my +1 +1 .. welcome aboard David. Sanjiva.

Re: OSGi Container in Geronimo

2005-10-23 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 15:38 -0700, Eishay Smith wrote: Dain, Did you think about the communication with client side? How do you think an OSGi bundle that lives inside an Eclipse environment will communicate with another bundle that resides in Geronimo? Will it have a standard way, using

Re: [HUMOR] Re: [POLL] API and Implementation serialization compatibility and upgrading

2005-05-17 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
What's the reason for originally deciding to go with object serialization to store configuration *data* instead of some text format, say an XML format? Sanjiva. On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 08:44 -0700, David Blevins wrote: Nice spin. Though you're joking around, I'll answer seriously. PROJECTS:

Re: IBM buys Gluecode

2005-05-10 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 11:36 -0700, Craig Johannsen wrote: Hey! This is a surprise. Is this ultimately good for Geronimo? Will IBM's business objectives for Websphere distort or limit the vision of the Geronimo project? The key for Geronimo's success as an Apache project lies with the

Re: [Axis2][Revisit]How about making Message context executable?

2005-03-09 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Um, Srinath wrong list? ;-) Sanjiva. - Original Message - From: Srinath Perera [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 3:49 PM Subject: [Axis2][Revisit]How about making Message context executable? Hi All; I put this Q about making the MessageContext

building the geronimo platform out a hodge-podge of other open source components

2005-03-09 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Hi Guys, This is a bit off from the usual discussions on this list .. ;-). I'm involved with some discussions on how open source projects manage to aggregate other components into larger components/products. Clearly Geronimo is a good example of a system that puts together a whole lotta other

Re: build failed Mon Feb 7 18:09:37 PST 2005

2005-02-08 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
ARGH! Can we not send such large attachments?? Sanjiva. - Original Message - From: i386-redhat-linux-gnu [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 8:09 AM Subject: build failed Mon Feb 7 18:09:37 PST 2005

Re: Tomcat Module Still Broken

2004-12-08 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I know that running two web servers seems cool, but would any (sane) user actually need (not want) to do this? I feel that a reasonable solution is to have separate distributions for tomcat and jetty. +1. Sanjiva.

Fw: possibility of using Geronimo kernel in Axis2

2004-11-22 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
I sent this earlier today but it hasn't made it to the list for some reason. Apologies if its a dup. Sanjiva. - Original Message - From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 5:27 AM Subject: possibility of using Geronimo kernel

possibility of using Geronimo kernel in Axis2

2004-11-21 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
Hi Guys, After meeting Jeremy and others at ApacheCon, I'm very interested in exploring the possibility of using the kernel in Axis2. Could I get some pointers please? The function we're looking for right now is: - class loading management for service isolation - deployment and deployed code