In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1)
because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi.
We'd like to move them to the Geronimo Specs subproject as it would be
more consistent and would allow them to pass the TCK.
The code base are available at:
https://sv
Fine with me!
david jencks
On Oct 23, 2008, at 11:29 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1)
because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi.
We'd like to move them to the Geronimo Specs subproject as it would be
more consiste
This sounds like a good thing to me too.
Rick
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1)
because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi.
We'd like to move them to the Geronimo Specs subproject as it would be
more consistent and would
+1 from me.
-Donald
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1)
because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi.
We'd like to move them to the Geronimo Specs subproject as it would be
more consistent and would allow them to pass the
+1
Jay
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> In ServiceMix we have rewritten the JAXB specs jars (2.0 and 2.1)
> because we needed to be able to do some modifications for OSGi.
> We'd like to move them to the Geronimo Specs subproject as it would be
> more consistent and would allow them to pass the TCK.
> Th
I've copied the jaxb 2.0 and 2.1 api to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jaxb_2.0_spec/
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jaxb_2.1_spec/
Everything looks ok (legal stuff, osgi manifest, etc...).
Would it be possible to use them to run
These are clean room implementations, right?
Also, does this provide the API and IMPL for JAXB?
-Donald
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I've copied the jaxb 2.0 and 2.1 api to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-jaxb_2.0_spec/
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/
On Wednesday 05 November 2008 9:43:28 pm Donald Woods wrote:
> These are clean room implementations, right?
Right. There were some bugs in a couple of the earlier versions where
Guillaume didn't read the spec carefully enough. As a couple of people have
used it, we've kind of ironed them out