Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?

2009-02-10 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I'll start a release asap. I know you've worked on the release process. Should a simple mvn release:prepare release:perform -Dgpg.passphrase=xxx -DaltDeploymentRepository=yyy work ? Or is there a better way to release gshell ? On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 11:59, Jason Dillon wrote: > That should be

Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?

2009-02-04 Thread Jason Dillon
That should be fine. --jason On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I've just build gshell using maven-project-2.1.0-M1 and it builds and starts correctly. Maybe we sould use that one instead ? or does r72 includes other mandatory fixes ? On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 09:07, Jason D

Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?

2009-02-04 Thread Guillaume Nodet
I've just build gshell using maven-project-2.1.0-M1 and it builds and starts correctly. Maybe we sould use that one instead ? or does r72 includes other mandatory fixes ? On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 09:07, Jason Dillon wrote: > maven-project-2.1.0-r72 is on the nexus instance on our zone, but

Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?

2009-02-04 Thread Jason Dillon
maven-project-2.1.0-r72 is on the nexus instance on our zone, but looks like its not running, not sure why... will take a look in a bit. --jason On Feb 4, 2009, at 2:47 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on maven-project-2.1.0-r72 which I ca

Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?

2009-02-03 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Done. I still have a problem with the dependency on maven-project-2.1.0-r72 which I can't found anymore. I will try to upgrade to 3.0-alpha-1 and see what it gives. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 04:47, Jason Dillon wrote: > Yes, go ahead. > > --jason > > > On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Node

Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?

2009-02-03 Thread Jason Dillon
Yes, go ahead. --jason On Feb 4, 2009, at 3:04 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month. Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ? On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon wrote: Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing

Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?

2009-02-03 Thread Guillaume Nodet
We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel before this month. Do you want me to roll back to genesis 1.6 ? On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 06:14, Jason Dillon wrote: > Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on GShell's > release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, ot

Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?

2009-01-11 Thread Jason Dillon
Well, I think its mostly Genesis 2.0 that is causing the lag on GShell's release. I'm going to see about fixing that this week, otherwise rolling back to the Genesis 1.6 stuff for the alpha-2. --jason On Jan 7, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: We are planning a release of Service

Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?

2009-01-07 Thread Guillaume Nodet
We are planning a release of ServiceMix Kernel in the near future. What are the missing bits to release GShell soon ? On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:25, Jason Dillon wrote: > The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major > changes have all been committed, and I don't have any

Re: [GSHELL] Timeframe ?

2008-10-17 Thread Jason Dillon
The GShell APIs are getting closer and closer to stability. The major changes have all been committed, and I don't have any plans to make any other significant changes to the core APIs. What I am doing now is trying to slim down the core dependencies and speed up the boot time... and sort

[GSHELL] Timeframe ?

2008-10-16 Thread Guillaume Nodet
In ServiceMix, we are considering upgrading to the latest trunk of GShell and I've already done the bigger part of the upgrade locally on my HD. Btw, I've committed a few small changes for that yesterday. However, I'm worried about the stability of gshell. We currently use an old and unreleased v