I don't know what happened but I see a bunch of checksum failed
messages from maven when downloading yoko artifacts. I also downloaded
some of these artifacts (without maven) and compared checksums and
they do NOT match.
Jarek
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
On Apr 27, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
I don't know what happened but I see a bunch of checksum failed
messages from maven when downloading yoko artifacts. I also downloaded
some of these artifacts (without maven) and compared checksums and
they do NOT match.
It looks like Brian
Kevan,
I've talked with Brian Fox and he says the checksums are recalculated when a
staging repo is promoted. So, fixing them in the staging repo would have no
lasting effect.
Based on this would you be interested in revising your -1?
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 25, 2010, at 4:27 PM, David
On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Kevan,
I've talked with Brian Fox and he says the checksums are recalculated when a
staging repo is promoted. So, fixing them in the staging repo would have no
lasting effect.
Based on this would you be interested in revising your
Vote passes with 4 +1 PMC votes and no other votes.
Rick McGuire
Donald Woods
David Jencks
Kevan Miller
I've promoted the staging repo and Brian Fox did something to fix the checksums.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi
Um, here's my +1
david jencks
On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB
and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading
related code changes from previous yoko releases.
Staging
I'm seeing one blocker issue -- all of the checksums that I have downloaded do
not match the corresponding checksums that I compute. For instance:
$ md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat
yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz.md5
md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat
The bad checksums seem to be because somehow maven 2.2.0 got installed on my
system. I have no idea why, but it's known to produce bad checksums.
I'll try to contact e.g. brian fox to see what we can do about them. I think
usually what has happened in the past is to promote, then fix, but
+1
ran RAT and IANAL and built from source. RAT is giving a some failures,
but the failures are either missing copyrights in NOTICES.vm and
LEGAL.vm files or in the source files that are directly generated from
the idl files. I don't think either problem is serious enough to
require a
+1 Looks good.
-Donald
On 4/22/10 10:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB
and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading
related code changes from previous yoko releases.
Staging repo:
Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB and
HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading related
code changes from previous yoko releases.
Staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-013/
Tag:
11 matches
Mail list logo