Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-27 Thread Jarek Gawor
I don't know what happened but I see a bunch of checksum failed messages from maven when downloading yoko artifacts. I also downloaded some of these artifacts (without maven) and compared checksums and they do NOT match. Jarek On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-27 Thread David Jencks
On Apr 27, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: I don't know what happened but I see a bunch of checksum failed messages from maven when downloading yoko artifacts. I also downloaded some of these artifacts (without maven) and compared checksums and they do NOT match. It looks like Brian

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-26 Thread David Jencks
Kevan, I've talked with Brian Fox and he says the checksums are recalculated when a staging repo is promoted. So, fixing them in the staging repo would have no lasting effect. Based on this would you be interested in revising your -1? thanks david jencks On Apr 25, 2010, at 4:27 PM, David

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-26 Thread Kevan Miller
On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:51 PM, David Jencks wrote: Kevan, I've talked with Brian Fox and he says the checksums are recalculated when a staging repo is promoted. So, fixing them in the staging repo would have no lasting effect. Based on this would you be interested in revising your

[RESULT] [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-26 Thread David Jencks
Vote passes with 4 +1 PMC votes and no other votes. Rick McGuire Donald Woods David Jencks Kevan Miller I've promoted the staging repo and Brian Fox did something to fix the checksums. thanks david jencks On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:38 PM, David Jencks wrote: Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-25 Thread David Jencks
Um, here's my +1 david jencks On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:38 PM, David Jencks wrote: Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading related code changes from previous yoko releases. Staging

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-25 Thread Kevan Miller
I'm seeing one blocker issue -- all of the checksums that I have downloaded do not match the corresponding checksums that I compute. For instance: $ md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz.md5 md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-25 Thread David Jencks
The bad checksums seem to be because somehow maven 2.2.0 got installed on my system. I have no idea why, but it's known to produce bad checksums. I'll try to contact e.g. brian fox to see what we can do about them. I think usually what has happened in the past is to promote, then fix, but

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-23 Thread Rick McGuire
+1 ran RAT and IANAL and built from source. RAT is giving a some failures, but the failures are either missing copyrights in NOTICES.vm and LEGAL.vm files or in the source files that are directly generated from the idl files. I don't think either problem is serious enough to require a

Re: [VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-23 Thread Donald Woods
+1 Looks good. -Donald On 4/22/10 10:38 PM, David Jencks wrote: Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading related code changes from previous yoko releases. Staging repo:

[VOTE] Yoko 1.1 with osgi

2010-04-22 Thread David Jencks
Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading related code changes from previous yoko releases. Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-013/ Tag: