On Aug 4, 2008, at 2:19 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
We could add the note in the version that we post to the wiki.
That seems good enough to me.
For future release notes, we might want to add a link at the top to
the online release notes with some "look here for updated information"
type text.
Jarek Gawor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for checking this out David.
It is my opinion that these issues are not sufficient to stop the release.
I agree.
If anyone feels otherwise please speak-up.
It appears #1 was introduced with rev.
Joe's set me straight. Everything is still valid.
Thanks,
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Jason Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There might have been an issue with the tck tests I ran. I'll need to
> discuss with Joe, but I suggest not closing the vote until the tests are
> verified as vali
There might have been an issue with the tck tests I ran. I'll need to
discuss with Joe, but I suggest not closing the vote until the tests are
verified as valid.
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Ted Kirby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Ted Kirby
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Joe Bohn
+1
Ted Kirby
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
> review and vote.
>
> The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/gero
On Aug 4, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Thanks for checking this out David.
It is my opinion that these issues are not sufficient to stop the
release.
I agree.
If anyone feels otherwise please speak-up.
It ap
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for checking this out David.
>
> It is my opinion that these issues are not sufficient to stop the release.
I agree.
> If anyone feels otherwise please speak-up.
>
> It appears #1 was introduced with rev. 665729 when
Thanks for checking this out David.
It is my opinion that these issues are not sufficient to stop the
release. If anyone feels otherwise please speak-up.
It appears #1 was introduced with rev. 665729 when attempting to make
gsh consistent with geronimo.sh (which has required JAVA_HOME or
J
Sorry for the delay getting to look at this.
I'm not sure these are enough to stop the release but
1. bin/gsh now insists you have JAVA_HOME or JRE_HOME defined even
though this is not needed for mac osx.
2. The on-startup list of ports in use says derby is on port 9, not
1527.
-0
tha
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 31/07/2008, at 12:52 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides
here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.2
+1
++Vamsi
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
> review and vote.
>
> The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geroni
+1
My production app deploys and works properly.
Jay
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
> review and vote.
>
> The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here
+1
Thanks Joe!
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.2
When the release vote i
+1
David
On Jul 30, 2008, at 7:52 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides
here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.2
When t
+1
--jason
On Jul 31, 2008, at 9:52 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides
here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.2
When
Things are looking good for the vote and I'm tempted to go ahead and
close it now given that the 72 hours have expired and we have indeed
passed TCK (thanks Jason!). However, I'm a little disappointed with the
relatively low number of votes. We had nearly 50% more votes for 2.1.1.
I'm also
+1
Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.2
When the release vote is approved, I will svn m
+1. All tck tests have passed.
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 6:55 AM, YunFeng Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> -- Yun Feng
>
>
> Joe Bohn wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
> review and vote.
>
> The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release
+1
-- Yun Feng
Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.2
When the release vote is appro
+1
Jacek
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
> review and vote.
>
> The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/
+1 Looks good.
Thanks Joe!
--kevan
On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:52 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides
here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/se
+1
Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.2
When the release vote is approved, I will svn m
+1
Lin
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Jarek Gawor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1.
>
> Jarek
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
>> review and vote.
>>
>> The source for the G
+1.
Jarek
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
> review and vote.
>
> The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronim
+1
Several samples worked for me.
Rick McGuire wrote:
+1
Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branch
+1
Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.2
When the release vote is approved, I will svn m
Oh yeah ... here's my +1.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.2
When the release v
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.2
When the release vote is approved, I will svn mv the code to
https:/
28 matches
Mail list logo
