Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)

2010-04-21 Thread Kevan Miller
On Apr 21, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Rick McGuire wrote: > On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> Rick, >> I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency >> issues. For example: >> >> ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be >> geronimo

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try) - CANCELLED

2010-04-21 Thread Rick McGuire
These problems are serious enough to require a retry on this. I'll start the rollback process and get new candidates ready as soon as I can. Rick On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Rick, I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency issues. For example: ejb

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)

2010-04-21 Thread Rick McGuire
On 4/21/2010 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: Rick, I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency issues. For example: ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1. jaxb 2.2 has a dependency on geronimo-activati

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)

2010-04-21 Thread Kevan Miller
Rick, I'm having some problems building this source. There are some dependency issues. For example: ejb 3.1 has a dependency on geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.0.1. That should be geronimo-jaxrpc_1.1_spec-2.1. jaxb 2.2 has a dependency on geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.0.3 not geronimo-activation_1

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)

2010-04-21 Thread Donald Woods
Another tag to cleanup - geronimo-validation_1.0_spec-1.0.1 -Donald On 4/19/10 6:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >> A little confused here >> >> For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant >> jpa_2.0_spec-1.2. >> >> Looking

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)

2010-04-21 Thread Donald Woods
OK, as long as the old tag is removed, I'm good. -Donald On 4/19/10 6:12 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote: >> A little confused here >> >> For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant >> jpa_2.0_spec-1.2. >> >> Looking at the tags, I s

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)

2010-04-19 Thread Rick McGuire
My +1 On 4/16/2010 10:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single vote for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been updated with comm

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)

2010-04-19 Thread Rick McGuire
On 4/16/2010 3:40 PM, Donald Woods wrote: A little confused here For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant jpa_2.0_spec-1.2. Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release - 2.0_spec-1.0.1 2.0_spec-1.2 Bu

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)

2010-04-16 Thread Donald Woods
A little confused here For JPA, you mentioned jpa_3.0_spec-1.2, but I'm guessing you meant jpa_2.0_spec-1.2. Looking at the tags, I see 2 releases of jpa_2.0_spec since I released the jpa_2.0_spec-1.0 release - 2.0_spec-1.0.1 2.0_spec-1.2 But only the 2.0_spec-1.2 artifacts are in the s

[VOTE] Release Geronimo Java EE specs (second try)

2010-04-16 Thread Rick McGuire
To support the upcoming Geronimo milestone release, I would like to release Java EE 6 versions of the geronimo specifications. This is a single vote for all specs new or updated for Java EE 6. In addition, the specs have been updated with common support for OSGi interactions. The RAT and IANA