I have worked on integrating the latest version of servicemix some weeks
ago (in december).
The gbeans / plan are in
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-gbean/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/gbean/
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/incubator/service
This is a very old vote. At the time of that vote, Geronimo included
service-mix. Service-mix was removed from the Geronimo 1.0 release
at the last minute by request of the service-mix team. They decided
to wait until they had better integration with the newest version of
service-mix rea
My day to look at incubator proposals... ;-)James, FYI, the ServiceMix proposal contains the following:The Geronimo project is currently using ServiceMix as its JBI container which is integrated into the Geronimo deployer.At some point-in-time, this was true. However, to my knowledge, there is no u
On 19 Nov 2005, at 04:30, Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
Has this proposal been sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] yet?
Not yet - I wanted to check the Geronimo project was happy to be the
sponsor first; the proposal will be sent later today.
I'd like to be one
of the incubation mentors .. given my in
+1
Been traveling, sorry for the delay.
-David
On Nov 18, 2005, at 8:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have
overwhelmingly voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqPro
+1
Regards,
Hiram
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have
overwhelmingly voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/
+1
this is just like big brother! voting projects out of the haus :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
> voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
>
> The incubator proposals are here...
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Activ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] +1 = I support the move to sponsor ActiveMQ & ServiceMix during
incubation as sub-projects of Geronimo
I've been following ServiceMix (and Celtix) since their very first days
and I'm glad to have heard such a great news! I'm absolutely for the move.
Jacek
+1
On 11/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelminglyvoted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixPro
+1
(I'll start getting the TCK licenses and TCKs for these... :)
On Nov 18, 2005, at 11:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have
overwhelmingly voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/inc
2 attempts via gmane to email this have failed, so hopefully this
one will succeed:
+1
Jan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incuba
+1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
Please vote if y
Has this proposal been sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] yet? I'd like to be one
of the incubation mentors .. given my involvement in Synapse I think
it'll be good to try to get cross-polination.
Sanjiva.
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 12:50 -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> [ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
>
> S
+1
Gianny
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
Please v
+1
david jencks
On Nov 18, 2005, at 8:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incub
Sorry if this is a duplicate... I voted a few hours ago, but it has not
turned up?
+1 Just like big brother - voting projects out of the haus!
cheers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
> voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
>
> Th
Sorry, i just get frustrated sometimes with lack of help. There's so
much to do and so little time. I know we have to plan *NOW* for JAXB
2.0 and JAX-WS to be able to get to the next rev of J2EE soon. I hope
some folks here can jump in to WS land and help implement them. When i
saw how closely some
Wow, it sounds like there is something very personal between you
two. You are both great guys and have a reputation for being very
reasonable. Can you guys maybe get together on the phone and work it
out?
I hope we can maintain the friendly tone we have been having lately
on this mailing
On 11/18/05, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> (I still have a vote right?)
Yes, you're still a committer and part of the PMC.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61Ehttp://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
James,
Could we expect any help, in any form, in any of the WS-* projects? i
guess not, from your email it is very clear that the involvement you
think about would be just a drop-in replacement for other things and
not much more. I thought for a few moments that since there is SO much
WS-* focus in
+1
(I still have a vote right?)
--jason
On Nov 18, 2005, at 8:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have
overwhelmingly voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
[ ] +1 = I support the move to sponsor ActiveMQ & ServiceMix during
incubation as sub-projects of Geronimo
[ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
[ ] -1 = I don't support this move because: ___
+1
On 18 Nov 2005, at 17:50, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
[ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
ServiceMix folks have not shown much interest in any WS projects at
Apache though I have seen their interest in so many non-Apache WS
projects including Celtix and JAX-WS RI (example see
http://mail-archive.objec
+1
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 16:20 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
> voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
>
> The incubator proposals are here...
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
> http://wiki.apache.org/
+1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
Please vote if you
+1 Excellent news :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
[ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
ServiceMix folks have not shown much interest in any WS projects at
Apache though I have seen their interest in so many non-Apache WS
projects including Celtix and JAX-WS RI (example see
http://mail-archive.objectweb.org/celtix-dev/2005-08/msg00112.html). I
don't
+1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
Please vote if y
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 11/18/2005 8:20 AM:
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sponsor of the projects
during incubation
[X] +1 = I support the move to sponsor ActiveMQ & ServiceMix during
incubation as sub-projects of Geronimo
[ ] +0 = I don't mind either way
[ ] -1 = I don'
On Fri, 2005-11-18 at 16:20 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
> voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
>
> The incubator proposals are here...
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
> http://wiki.apache.org/incu
+1
-dain
On Nov 18, 2005, at 8:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have
overwhelmingly voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
On 11/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
> voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
>
> The incubator proposals are here...
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/
+1
On 11/18/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
> voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
>
> The incubator proposals are here...
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
> http://wiki.apache.org/incuba
+1!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
Please vote if yo
The current PMCs of both ActiveMQ and ServiceMix have overwhelmingly
voted to become Geronimo sub-projects.
The incubator proposals are here...
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ActiveMqProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ServiceMixProposal
Please vote if you'd like Geronimo to be the sp
35 matches
Mail list logo
