[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12370944
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-851:
--
I'll hold it off until I have sorted out the issues I'm having with the
security module. Looking into it.
> Move Geron
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12369259
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-851:
-
directory is failing because of -
[INFO] Failed to resolve artifact.
required artifacts missing:
xmlbeans:xml
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12369255
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-851:
-
These instructions are same as in security module :
This is the build order -
cd modules/util mvn install
cd ../sy
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12368944
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-851:
-
GERONIMO-1693 is needed for all the builders.
> Move Geronimo Build to M2 (Maven 2)
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12368450
]
Prasad Kashyap commented on GERONIMO-851:
-
Tracking the migration work effort here -
http://opensource2.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Migration+to+M
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12368096
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-851:
-
Thanks for pointing this out! This patch was created from geronimo-1.1 dir
using TortoiseSVN!
IN last 2 weeks I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12368024
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-851:
--
$ svn ci -m 'Upgrade Tomcat to the latest version used by Geronimo. Thanks
Anita!' pom.xml
Sendingpom.xml
Trans
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12367087
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-851:
--
$ svn ci maven.xml
Sendingmaven.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 379245.
With the revision, you
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12366407
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-851:
--
A page with the list of the dependencies and their status wrt POM v. 4.0.0 -
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Maven2Conv
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12319123
]
David DeWolf commented on GERONIMO-851:
---
I just got done converting Pluto's 1.1 branch to maven to and would be willing
to help out. I'm not that familiar with Geron
"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 18/08/2005 07:24:10 AM:
>
> On Aug 17, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
>
> > On 8/17/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I think we should consider choosing appropriate timing -
it sounds
> >> like a big effort,
On Aug 17, 2005, at 1:10 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 8/17/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we should consider choosing appropriate timing - it sounds
like a big effort, and how does this fit into what we want to do w/
M5, 1.0, etc I was going to suggest voting on eve
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MMS-Smtp-Program: Macallan-Mail-Solution; Version 4.6.0.1
X-MMS-Smtp-Auth: Authenticated As [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MMS-Smtp-Mailer-Program: Macallan-Mail-So
On Wednesday 17 August 2005 13:58, Bruce Snyder wrote:
> > +1000
>
> Wow, that number has 55 zeros - one zero higher than Septendecillion.
> Does anyone know if there's a name for that number? Maybe 10
> Septendecillion?
That is correct accordin
On 8/17/05, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Snyder wrote, On 8/17/2005 10:58 AM:
> On 8/17/05, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 17, 2005, at 9:42 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
>
>
> After the conversion, I hope that we have no more jelly.
>
>
Bruce Snyder wrote, On 8/17/2005 10:58 AM:
On 8/17/05, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 17, 2005, at 9:42 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
After the conversion, I hope that we have no more jelly.
+10
On 8/17/05, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Aug 17, 2005, at 9:42 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> > After the conversion, I hope that we have no more jelly.
>
> +1000
Wow, that number has 55 zeros - one zero higher than Septendeci
I think that some work can be done investigating where the jelly lies.
We can then add sub-tasks to track their conversion. All of this can be
done w/out interfering with the M5 release.
Regards,
Alan
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 8/17/2005 9:54 AM:
Thx.
I think we should consider choosin
Whats your thoughts on creating a directory in each of the modules
called "m2" and begin the development there. I like what OpenEJB has
done in this effort.
Then when its all converted we can move the code up into each module and
get rid of the "old way".
This will allow us to piece meal it
On Aug 17, 2005, at 9:42 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
After the conversion, I hope that we have no more jelly.
+1000
-dain
On 8/17/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we should consider choosing appropriate timing - it sounds
> like a big effort, and how does this fit into what we want to do w/
> M5, 1.0, etc I was going to suggest voting on even doing this, but I
> can't imagine that at *some
Thx.
I think we should consider choosing appropriate timing - it sounds
like a big effort, and how does this fit into what we want to do w/
M5, 1.0, etc I was going to suggest voting on even doing this, but I
can't imagine that at *some* point in the future, we don't want to be
on M2, so
To be a little more specific, maven 1 and maven 2 can both work with
maven 2 POMs. It's our non-standard jelly code that impedes our
conversion. We need to enumerate where that code is, determine if there
is an M2 replacement for it, it not decide if we need it and if we do,
make a plug in or
Normally, yes. Unfortunately there is a lot of jelly code out there.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 8/17/2005 9:15 AM:
Is it backwards compatible?
IOW, can people that use M1 also still work?
geir
On Aug 17, 2005, at 8:03 AM, John Sisson (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
On 8/17/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it backwards compatible?
>
> IOW, can people that use M1 also still work?
No, a conversion from Maven 1 to Maven 2 is akin to a switch from
Maven 1 to makefiles. Users will need to install Maven 2 (aka m2) in
order to use a Maven 2 s
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12319053
]
Bruce Snyder commented on GERONIMO-851:
---
Yes, I'm interested in helping with this effort. I was going to go through a
conversion of Castor's Maven build from Maven 1
Is it backwards compatible?
IOW, can people that use M1 also still work?
geir
On Aug 17, 2005, at 8:03 AM, John Sisson (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?
page=comments#action_12319006 ]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-851:
--
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-851?page=comments#action_12319006
]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-851:
--
I am looking into how we can split this work into subtasks. A subtask per
module is probably going overboard.
Any other volun
28 matches
Mail list logo
