Hey..
3.2.4 Should be up now on the codehaus repo.
On 6/12/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I talked with Hiram tonight (before catching up on e-mail so I hadn't seen this
note) about getting
3.2.4 closed out. Apparently the Codehaus outage left AMQ in an indeterminent
state. W
Also mentioned in another thread:
Two things:
1. Releases can't be vetoed; they use a consensual vote,
not the '3 +1s and 0 -1s' mechanism.
2. Since a release bears the Apache name, releasing software
is an official act of the Foundation, and as a consequence
only members of the PMC hav
David,
Thanks for the heads up. I saw the JIRA and the commits. Leave it open but I suspect we're going
to close down tonight and cut the final release.
David Jencks wrote:
I think that we may need to recut the release due to
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2108
Apparently
I think that we may need to recut the release due to http://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2108
Apparently I forgot to convert message-destination elements in
geronimo plans to the naming namespace and as a consequence it is
impossible to use them in web plans. Aside from rewriti
John,
I'm not aware of what does or does not go into the NOTICES file. If we need the notices does anyone
have a list of them lying around on their harddisk ?
Otherwise, any volunteers to pull them together?
Hernan, could you start a Wiki page for people to post their findings to?
Cheers,
I have started some due diligence checking on the release candidate and
have a few questions.
AFAIK, the NOTICE.txt file should contain required third-party
notices/attributions, yet it seems pretty empty to me.
For example, I was expecting to see the text from
http://www.bouncycastle.org/li
I talked with Hiram tonight (before catching up on e-mail so I hadn't seen this note) about getting
3.2.4 closed out. Apparently the Codehaus outage left AMQ in an indeterminent state. We've tested
the existing 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT against CTS. I would prefer to close out AMQ 3.2.4 as is and fix thi
Based on your feedback Kevan I have sent a few notes requesting the release of AMQ to the dev
thread. Perhaps Hiram is not monitoring this thread so I will ping him on this.
Kevan Miller wrote:
My first response went to the user list. I'm repeating on dev...
ActiveMQ 3.2.4 hasn't been release
As far as I know, the patch is valid, it just needs to be applied to a
different module than it was created against. I'm not sure if we're
waiting for this for the release or not. I had hoped it would go in.
Hiram, do you want to look at it or do you want me to?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 6/12/06, Jo
Alan,
Are you asking for Matt to change the subject line of the vote? That
would be appropriate. Something like "[Vote] Release Geronimo 1.1
based on 1.1-rc1"
Or were you not aware of what you were voting on? The note states:
Your voting and feedback are for:
Geronimo 1.1
DayTrader 1.1
Sp
I thought that we were waiting for
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1451 to be fixed.
Aaron and Hiram do you know what is happening here?
John
Kevan Miller wrote:
My first response went to the user list. I'm repeating on dev...
ActiveMQ 3.2.4 hasn't been released yet? I see we'r
We vote for release candidates? I don't recall doing that before.
+1
Regards,
Alan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I apologize for resending this to the lists. I inadvertantly did not
put [vote] in the subject line so it may not have been apparent. The
remainder of this e-mail is the same content t
Would it be possible to publish the specs in an m2 repo ?
It seems they are currently in
http://people.apache.org/repository/org.apache.geronimo.specs/jars/
but this is a m1 repo and the poms are not available.
AFAIK, their final place should be
http://www.apache.org/dist/maven-repository/org/a
FYI, a problem with the web access log portlet in the release
candidate was reported on the user list. Turns out this results from
the change in rev 407883 which disables the access logs in the tomcat
assembly. Some issues with the current configuration are:
-- the web access log viewer in the
My first response went to the user list. I'm repeating on dev...
ActiveMQ 3.2.4 hasn't been released yet? I see we're still including
ActiveMQ 3.2.4-SNAPSHOT in our repository. What's the plan, there?
I don't think we can release until ActiveMQ has released... Is there
some problem?
--kev
[Note: this is a duplicate of a post in another thread, but I wanted
to have my vote recorded in the official vote thread.]
I have downloaded and tried out all 4 .tgz files. Here is what I
tested:
o I placed them into the directory /Users/dain/geronimo test/ (note
contains a space)
o St
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I apologize for resending this to the lists. I inadvertantly did not
> put [vote] in the subject line so it may not have been apparent. The
> remainder of this e-mail is the same content that was distributed last
> night.
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> Over the past few d
I apologize for resending this to the lists. I inadvertantly did not put [vote] in the subject line
so it may not have been apparent. The remainder of this e-mail is the same content that was
distributed last night.
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Over the past few days the outstanding issues that were
On 6/12/06, Dave Colasurdo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems the out of box use of plugins in the admin console is
erroneously creating url links to install the "welcome app" and "admin
console" plugins. They are already installed and started in the j2ee
distribution.
Hmm. That's probably b
It seems the out of box use of plugins in the admin console is
erroneously creating url links to install the "welcome app" and "admin
console" plugins. They are already installed and started in the j2ee
distribution.
Thanks
-Dave-
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Over the past few days the outstanding i
I have downloaded and tried out all 4 .tgz files. Here is what I
tested:
o I placed them into the directory /Users/dain/geronimo test/ (note
contains a space)
o Started the servers using server.jar and startup.sh
o Stopped the server using ctrl^c and shutdown.sh
o Installed some of samples
Over the past few days the outstanding issues that were raised about the first candidate have been
addressed.
They were that we were missing the LICENSE.txt as well as Notices from the distribution. I added
them. Guillaume also pointed out that he noted that there should be a Third Party Noti
22 matches
Mail list logo
