I'll update the specs wrt imported packages and version policy. Do you have
a list of the specs that you intend to release ?
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 21:07, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> I also think all the osgi imported packages should have a version range up
> to the next major version. Currently
I also think all the osgi imported packages should have a version range up
to the next major version. Currently, those are defined as unbounded range
up to infinity is problematic if we have in the future a new incompatible
major version.
Also, I wonder if the org.apache.geronimo.osgi.registry.ap
Have the specs jars been tested in both a non osgi environment and an osgi
environment ?
Also, i'd like to have the scripting api and rest api osgi-fied the same
way. We'd need them in servicemix, and given you have rewritten the specs
to support osgi, i don't see the need to maintain the servicem
If we wish to release a milestone soon, we need to start getting the
different subcomponents released fairly quickly. Here are the things I
believe we need to have release votes on:
1) New spec components. These need to be done first, and should
probably done as a single vote rather than tr
