Re: ClassFinder questions/problems -- annotation processing

2007-02-19 Thread Tim McConnell
Hi David, I haven't applied your patch yet but will do that first thing in the morning--I've been looking at all the Naming Builders. So based on the current set of Naming Builders we have in Geronimo it looks like we should have to support the following references via annotations: ejb-ref ejb

Re: ClassFinder questions/problems -- annotation processing

2007-02-17 Thread David Jencks
I think the only annotations geronimo itself has to pay attention to are: javax.annotation.Resource(s) javax.annotation.security.* (maybe) javax.ejb.EJB(s) javax.persistence.PersistenceContext(s) javax.persistence.PersistenceUnit(s) javax.xml.ws.WebServiceRef(s) there are some more I'm really

Re: ClassFinder questions/problems -- annotation processing

2007-02-16 Thread Tim McConnell
Thanks for the info David. At times it's not obvious to me which annotations have already been implemented as part of other projects and which require Geronimo implementation changes. So I've been keeping track of them on the wiki below. The ones with a red-X or green-Checkmark in the far-right-

Re: ClassFinder questions/problems -- annotation processing

2007-02-16 Thread David Blevins
On Feb 15, 2007, at 9:25 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi David/Dain, I finally see what's going on here now--and it really makes a lot of sense. I'm not so sure it's a bug with the classloading process so much as it's just the way the current code functions. I can't easily show a sequence diag

Re: ClassFinder questions/problems -- annotation processing

2007-02-15 Thread Tim McConnell
Hi David/Dain, I finally see what's going on here now--and it really makes a lot of sense. I'm not so sure it's a bug with the classloading process so much as it's just the way the current code functions. I can't easily show a sequence diagram here but can briefly explain. It appears the the "Ea

Re: ClassFinder questions/problems -- annotation processing

2007-02-06 Thread Tim McConnell
Hi Dain, What you suggest does make a lot of sense. But for the stateless-calculator ear file (i.e., calculator-stateless-ear-2[1].0-M2.ear) I would then expect to find the calculator-stateless-ear-2[1].0-M2.jar file on one of the parent classloaders for the WAR classloader in AbstractWebModule

Re: ClassFinder questions/problems -- annotation processing

2007-02-06 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:49 PM, David Blevins wrote: On Feb 4, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi again Dave, after your recommendation below to do all the annotation discovery during the installModule phase of deployment ClassFinder is working much better for me. I do still have anot

Re: ClassFinder questions/problems -- annotation processing

2007-02-06 Thread David Blevins
On Feb 4, 2007, at 7:19 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi again Dave, after your recommendation below to do all the annotation discovery during the installModule phase of deployment ClassFinder is working much better for me. I do still have another scenario I'd appreciate some advice on. It seem

Re: ClassFinder questions/problems -- annotation processing

2007-02-04 Thread Tim McConnell
Hi again Dave, after your recommendation below to do all the annotation discovery during the installModule phase of deployment ClassFinder is working much better for me. I do still have another scenario I'd appreciate some advice on. It seems that when an EJB EAR file (with embedded JAR and WAR

Re: ClassFinder questions/problems -- annotation processing

2007-01-29 Thread David Blevins
On Jan 27, 2007, at 10:20 PM, Tim McConnell wrote: Hi David, I'm having a couple problems with ClassFinder that I hope you can help me with. 1 -- I've annotated a number of methods in a serlvlet with the @Resource annotation, but I'm having some trouble discovering them in the WAR file j