06, 2007 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
Hi Simon,
Comments inline.
On 7/5/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu
more comments in line
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
for the discussions.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both
lists)
Hi Simon,
Comments inline.
On 7/5
Hi Jacek,
Comments inline
On 7/5/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you are right. But if you see the Tuscany samples it supports SCA
modules that don't have sca-contribution.xml and just a .composite
file. So I was on two minds
Comments in-line...
On 7/6/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jacek,
Comments inline
On 7/5/07, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you are right. But if you see the Tuscany samples it supports SCA
modules that don't have
On 7/4/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes you are right. But if you see the Tuscany samples it supports SCA
modules that don't have sca-contribution.xml and just a .composite
file. So I was on two minds here whether to mandate
sca-contribution.xml or not.
Hi Manu,
Let's see what's
Reddy wrote:
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany modules into
Geronimo and use the deployed services by looking up in JNDI. I
On 7/3/07, Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(a) I develop SCA components, assemble them in a composite, package them
in an SCA contribution. I don't really know what a WAR or an EAR is, I'm
just using the SCA programming model and packaging model. I deploy my
SCA contribution
Hi Jacek,
Glad that you could join this discussion. Welcome :). We
need more participants like you to join this dicussion to come out
with the best approach. I have added my comments inline on my
understanding on why we should be doing this. This is actually based
on the JEE SCA
:53 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
Hi ,
From Paul's mail I guess a Geronimo plugin would be
the way forward. I am going to list down a few more questions on the
scenarios that Sebastien has explained. The scenarios are given first
Hi Simon,
In one of the previous mails Sebastien proposed two
ways of how the SCADomain should exist in geronimo
(a) one instance of SCADomain per component running on the server,
loaded with a subset of the distributed SCA domain composite
representing that component and enough
Hi Jacek,
The spec also says in 1.10.2.2.
The contribution optionally contains a document that declares runnable
composites, exported definitions and imported definitions. The
document is found at the path of META-INF/sca-contribution.xml
relative to the root of the contribution.I
Hi ,
From Paul's mail I guess a Geronimo plugin would be
the way forward. I am going to list down a few more questions on the
scenarios that Sebastien has explained. The scenarios are given first
and then my understanding, approach and issues. I would be just
listing two of the
Hi,
Please see my comments inline.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Manu George [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 7:53 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo-Tuscany integration(Sending to both lists)
Hi
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
I have put the comments inline.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
Thank you for the very detailed responses and links.
I am still in the process of going through the SCA specs. With my
current understanding I have put in responses inline
On 6/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Raymond is away for one
Hi Jean-Sebastien,
I have put the comments inline.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany modules
On Jun 29, 2007, at 3:11 AM, Manu George wrote:
Some of the questions we have are:
1. Should we use this plugin approach and host the plugin
separatley
or intergrate Tuscany to be bundled as part of the Geronimo
distribution?
The plugin approach looks OK to me, but maybe somebody from
Raymond is away for one more week, so I'll try to answer some of these
questions.
Manu George wrote:
Hi Raymond/Jay,
I would like to join this effort. I would like to discuss what
is expected of the deep integration. I will just list down my
understanding of both the current and
Comments inline.
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
Myself and Manu have done some work (a small PoC) on Geronimo Tuscany
integration. As a first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo
that will let the user to deploy standalone tuscany modules into
Geronimo and use the deployed services
Hi,
Myself and Manu have been working on the integration thing. As a
first step, we have created a plugin for Geronimo that will let the
user to deploy standalone tuscany modules into Geronimo and use the
deployed services by looking up in JNDI. I have put the code in
Geronimo Sandbox at
Hi Raymond/Jay,
I would like to join this effort. I would like to discuss what
is expected of the deep integration. I will just list down my
understanding of both the current and proposed integrations
Understanding of the Current Integration
1) TuscanyContextListener creates an SCA domain
Hi,
Thank you all for the comments and suggestions. I'll keep this list updated
when we get option 1 working.
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: Geronimo/Tuscany
On 4/27/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thank you all for the comments and suggestions. I'll keep this list updated
when we get option 1 working.
Where is it going to be done? Is it going to be done on the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list or here? Where's the place for the source
I agree with Dain.
Vamsi
On 4/26/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest you get option 1 working before attempting option 2. I
suspect you will find lots of bugs and mismatched assumptions. Once
that is working, option 2 will be much easier to implement since you
know it
Hi, Geronimo community.
As you may know, Tuscany is an Apache project under incubation to provide an
open source SOA infrastructure. For more information, you can visit
http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/.
Tuscany implements the SCA specification (http://www.osoa.org) and allows
you to develop
Hello Raymond,
I think it would almost be a shame if the only option for including
Tuscany in Geronimo was to package the runtime jar in individual WAR files.
Tuscany would make an excellent (I think) plugin.
Option 2 definitely.
Jay
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Geronimo community.
As you may
I suggest you get option 1 working before attempting option 2. I
suspect you will find lots of bugs and mismatched assumptions. Once
that is working, option 2 will be much easier to implement since you
know it Should Work.
-dain
On Apr 25, 2007, at 1:23 PM, Jay D. McHugh wrote:
Hello
Dain is right - Option 1 should probably be a stepping stone on the way
to 2.
Jay
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I suggest you get option 1 working before attempting option 2. I
suspect you will find lots of bugs and mismatched assumptions. Once
that is working, option 2 will be much easier to
I support Dain's approach.
Think big, start small.
Cheers
Prasad
On 4/25/07, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suggest you get option 1 working before attempting option 2. I
suspect you will find lots of bugs and mismatched assumptions. Once
that is working, option 2 will be much
Hi Raymond,
I would like to see a deep integration.
Jeff
Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Geronimo community.
As you may know, Tuscany is an Apache project under incubation to
provide an open source SOA infrastructure. For more information, you can
visit http://cwiki.apache.org/TUSCANY/.
30 matches
Mail list logo
