Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-18 Thread Kresten Krab Thorup
Kresten, what exactly are you working on? I have some code locally that implements simple things like ORB.list_initial_services, string_to_object, etc. I plan to finish this up this weekend and send a patch. I'm working on getting infrastructure in place that I can run the client side

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-18 Thread David Blevins
Ok either averaging 4 hours of sleep this week is getting to me or Alan started speaking another language deceptively like English but where you agree with people by disagreeing with them. My wife speaks this language fluently. On Nov 17, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: +1 Using J

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-18 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Lars Kühne wrote, On 11/17/2005 10:18 PM: Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Lars Kühne wrote, On 11/17/2005 3:19 PM: On 11/17/05, *Dain Sundstrom* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: +1 Using JIRA for tracking progress of the ORB would be great. [...] I suggest you create

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-17 Thread Lars Kühne
Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Lars Kühne wrote, On 11/17/2005 3:19 PM: On 11/17/05, *Dain Sundstrom* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: +1 Using JIRA for tracking progress of the ORB would be great. [...] I suggest you create an "Add an ORB implementation" issue th

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-17 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Lars Kühne wrote, On 11/17/2005 3:19 PM: Kevan Miller wrote: On 11/17/05, *Dain Sundstrom* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: +1 Using JIRA for tracking progress of the ORB would be great. We already have a CORBA component, so I suggest you create an "Add an

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-17 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Nov 17, 2005, at 3:19 PM, Lars Kühne wrote: Kevan Miller wrote: On 11/17/05, *Dain Sundstrom* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Lars if you give me you jira id, lkuehne I can add you as a geronimo committer, so you can assign issues to yourself. Umm, t

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-17 Thread Lars Kühne
Kevan Miller wrote: On 11/17/05, *Dain Sundstrom* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: +1 Using JIRA for tracking progress of the ORB would be great. We already have a CORBA component, so I suggest you create an "Add an ORB implementation" issue that can be the

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-17 Thread Kevan Miller
On 11/17/05, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 Using JIRA for tracking progress of the ORB would be great.We already have a CORBA component, so I suggest you create an "Add anORB implementation" issue that can be the parent of all the tasks. Also make sure that you assign it to at lea

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-17 Thread Dain Sundstrom
+1 Using JIRA for tracking progress of the ORB would be great. We already have a CORBA component, so I suggest you create an "Add an ORB implementation" issue that can be the parent of all the tasks. Also make sure that you assign it to at least version 1.1 (assuming the plan is to have th

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-17 Thread Lars Kühne
Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote: Just to give you some direct guidance, you probably should have shot an email out to the group saying "what do you guys do for testing when more than one VM is involved" or "we have this idea for testing in more than one VM, what do you think?" You are rig

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-17 Thread Jacek Laskowski
Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote: Kresten currently works full time on the ORB implementation and a lot of progress is being made here. Could we somehow help in the progress? It would be very beneficial if the progress became more visible. That's how I have read your intents, actually - the mo

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-17 Thread Anders Hessellund Jensen
Just to give you some direct guidance, you probably should have shot an email out to the group saying "what do you guys do for testing when more than one VM is involved" or "we have this idea for testing in more than one VM, what do you think?" You are right, and I apologise. Open source de

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-17 Thread Jacek Laskowski
Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote: Hi Anders, This is to let you all in on the progress with the Geronimo ORB implementation. We have been working on writing a test framework, that would allow us to coordinate and run ORBs in separate JVMs. The test framework is not 100% polished yet, but it

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-16 Thread David Blevins
Sounds cool. Just to give you some direct guidance, you probably should have shot an email out to the group saying "what do you guys do for testing when more than one VM is involved" or "we have this idea for testing in more than one VM, what do you think?" Not a big deal, you're here, y

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-16 Thread Anders Hessellund Jensen
David Blevins wrote: So what kind of testing framework is this? Is it junit-based? Yes, it is junit-based. Essentially, we have created a test superclass, which inherits from junit.framework.Test. So, assume we would like a Multi-JVM test with a single test case named "Simple". We have two

Re: Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-16 Thread David Blevins
Just throwing out some questions in hopes to spur a conversation. Feel free combine questions or throw in details as you see fit. So what kind of testing framework is this? Is it junit-based? How does it related to our existing itests? Those are server (and database) agnostic and can be ra

Geronimo ORB progress

2005-11-16 Thread Anders Hessellund Jensen
Hi all, This is to let you all in on the progress with the Geronimo ORB implementation. We have been working on writing a test framework, that would allow us to coordinate and run ORBs in separate JVMs. The test framework is not 100% polished yet, but it works, and it facilitates very easy