Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-10 Thread anita kulshreshtha
--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please don't put them in the same domain as the rest of the geronimo > > mbeans. This will cause many TCK tests to fail and may result in > name collisions. There are no name collisions because tomcat MBeans use type=... in their names wh

Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-10 Thread Matt Hogstrom
On Nov 9, 2006, at 3:37 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:44 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: I don't think it is worth the risk to attempt this for 1.2. I agree this should be deferred until after 1.2 is out. -dain Matt Hogst

Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-09 Thread anita kulshreshtha
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Can we find out >exactly what problems this causes before we reject it out of hand? I am more concerned about the fact that the GlobalRequestProcessors are returning all zeros statistics for all the connectors. I was hoping if enough people looked a

Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-09 Thread anita kulshreshtha
The trace was in the original mail. I was getting noSuchMethodException for "findMappingObject" then for "findStaticResources" and welcomeFiles. Please see: http://www.nabble.com/Geronimo-jmx-question-p7074389.html I added these to TomcatWebAppContext. Now I am gettin

Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-09 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:44 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: Dain Sundstrom wrote: Please don't put them in the same domain as the rest of the geronimo mbeans. This will cause many TCK tests to fail and may result in name collisions. I agree with Da

Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-09 Thread Jeff Genender
Can you please attach the stack trace? I didn't see it attached. Jeff anita kulshreshtha wrote: >That is exactly how I am setting it. The attached stack traced is > produced by changing 1 character in the EngineGBean! > > Thanks > Anita > > --- Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-09 Thread anita kulshreshtha
That is exactly how I am setting it. The attached stack traced is produced by changing 1 character in the EngineGBean! Thanks Anita --- Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't really like this solution. I really am against blocking logs > unless absolutely necessary since it poten

Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-09 Thread David Jencks
On Nov 9, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Jeff Genender wrote: Dain Sundstrom wrote: Please don't put them in the same domain as the rest of the geronimo mbeans. This will cause many TCK tests to fail and may result in name collisions. I agree with Dain as well. I kinda think it would theoretical

Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-09 Thread Jeff Genender
Dain Sundstrom wrote: > Please don't put them in the same domain as the rest of the geronimo > mbeans. This will cause many TCK tests to fail and may result in name > collisions. I agree with Dain as well. > > -dain > > On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:28 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: > >> I am trying

Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-09 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Please don't put them in the same domain as the rest of the geronimo mbeans. This will cause many TCK tests to fail and may result in name collisions. -dain On Nov 7, 2006, at 12:28 PM, anita kulshreshtha wrote: I am trying to set domain name for tomcat Mbeans to 'geronimo' instead of 'Ge

Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-09 Thread Jeff Genender
I don't really like this solution. I really am against blocking logs unless absolutely necessary since it potentially hides bigger problems.  Why don't you change the "Geronimo" in the Engine (in the plan.xml of the config) to "geronimo" to help make this work? Jeff anita kulshreshtha wrote:

Re: Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-09 Thread anita kulshreshtha
I would like to ignore the warning issued by tomcat by setting log4j.logger.org.apache.catalina.connector.MapperListener=ERROR. This part of the code (see below) is not executed if the engine name is Geronimo. This would allows us to refer to tomcat servlet MBeans as geronimo:.

Setting domain for tomcat MBeans [was Re: Geronimo jmx question]

2006-11-07 Thread anita kulshreshtha
I am trying to set domain name for tomcat Mbeans to 'geronimo' instead of 'Geronimo'. This will make tomcat MBeans, have names like geronimo:... However as it is apparent from this trace that tomcat does not like it. The server behaves normally except for this trace. The problem is the

Re: Geronimo jmx question

2006-10-30 Thread anita kulshreshtha
This seems to be a known problem:http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/catalina/docs/api/org/apache/catalina/core/StandardContext.html#findMappingObject()public Context findMappingObject()FIXME: Fooling introspection ...I would like to put a workaround this problem. Any help will be appre

Geronimo jmx question

2006-10-30 Thread anita kulshreshtha
Could someone please help me understand this? I have made some (trivial) modifications to geronimo-tomcat classes to set J2EEApplication and J2EEServer. During the startup of server I get this trace for each config containing a webapp. The serverotherwise starts fine. The console and the apps are