Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

2010-08-11 Thread Donald Woods
For the Bean Validation TCK, I compared the content that gets downloaded from the JBoss maven repo to the 1.0.3 content provided from Oracle and they were identical. Not sure what that means for final JEE6 certification, but I don't see how they can tell from the logs which set of artifacts were

Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

2010-08-11 Thread Donald Woods
The BVAL and JCDI builds have now been updated to allow extracting Geronimo assemblies into the target directory for automated testing. mvn test -Pincontainer,geronimo-assembly -DassemblyId=tomcat7-javaee6 Note, that the assemblyIds are different from the ones defined in the parent server POM,

Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

2010-08-10 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:04 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Ok, it sounds like more people prefer to move these tcks into a public svn location. So I guess we should create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/tck repo and move the tcks over. There should be no problem with moving the

Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

2010-08-10 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:04 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Ok, it sounds like more people prefer to move these tcks into a public svn location. So I guess we should create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/tck repo and move the tcks over. There should be no problem with moving the

Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

2010-07-21 Thread Donald Woods
On 7/21/10 12:04 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: Ok, it sounds like more people prefer to move these tcks into a public svn location. So I guess we should create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/tck repo and move the tcks over. There should be no problem with moving the following

Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

2010-07-20 Thread David Jencks
porting modules live. The JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs are public Apache licensed, so we could move the porting modules for those two TCKs into our public svn. The part of my brain that finds esthetic pleasure in filling cabinets likes everything all organized in the one VM

Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

2010-07-20 Thread Kevan Miller
On Jul 20, 2010, at 3:05 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Jul 19, 2010, at 10:37 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote: My main concern is that if we move the JCDI and Bean Validation porting code to public svn location then we will effectively have two mailing lists for discussing tck issues, two jira places

Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

2010-07-20 Thread Jarek Gawor
Ok, it sounds like more people prefer to move these tcks into a public svn location. So I guess we should create a https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/tck repo and move the tcks over. There should be no problem with moving the following modules (since it's all Apache licensed stuff): 1)

JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

2010-07-19 Thread David Blevins
Currently we have these setup in the private svn where the Java EE TCK porting modules live. The JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs are public Apache licensed, so we could move the porting modules for those two TCKs into our public svn. The part of my brain that finds esthetic pleasure in filling

Re: JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs

2010-07-19 Thread Jarek Gawor
AM, David Blevins david.blev...@visi.com wrote: Currently we have these setup in the private svn where the Java EE TCK porting modules live.  The JCDI and Bean Validation TCKs are public Apache licensed, so we could move the porting modules for those two TCKs into our public svn. The part