Re: JMS configuration plans and config.list questions

2005-08-05 Thread Joe Bohn
Well I'm still feeling my way around the web console code, but it looks to me like they are expecting users to add more queues to the org/apache/geronimo/SystemJMS config. What should be be encouraging them to do ... that's the harder question. I'll look for somebody else to answer that one.

Re: JMS configuration plans and config.list questions

2005-08-05 Thread David Jencks
On Aug 5, 2005, at 6:32 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Well I'm still feeling my way around the web console code, but it looks to me like they are expecting users to add more queues to the org/apache/geronimo/SystemJMS config. I don't think this is possible yet, although I think aaron is working on

Re: JMS configuration plans and config.list questions

2005-08-05 Thread Joe Bohn
David, Thanks for your help ... see comments below. David Jencks wrote: On Aug 5, 2005, at 6:32 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Well I'm still feeling my way around the web console code, but it looks to me like they are expecting users to add more queues to the org/apache/geronimo/SystemJMS

JMS configuration plans and config.list questions

2005-08-04 Thread sissonj
The org/apache/geronimo/SystemJMS config defines an ActiveMQ resource adapter ( and the DefaultActiveMQConnectionFactory ) , MDBTransferBeanOutQueue and SendReceiveQueue admin objects. Should the two queues be removed ( I assume they were there for testing in the past)? Are we expecting users