nimo.apache.org
Subject: Fwd: License issues with
commonj
I sent this earlier with some non-text inclusions, and haven't seen it
get through. I'm trying again typing out some of the quoted pdf contents.
Begin forwarded message:
From:
David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
My personal preference is to have all of our spec APIs available in
source form from the geronimo-specs tree, so I'd much rather just
type them in.
-dain
On Feb 2, 2006, at 2:07 AM, Andy Piper wrote:
At 06:59 AM 2/2/2006, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I've also discussed this issue regarding th
At 06:59 AM 2/2/2006, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I've also discussed this issue regarding the lack of any
recognizable license for their code w/ BEA and IBM, and they have
made it very clear that they will provide one if needed.
So the question is, type or wait for license? I say "type"
I bel
I sent this earlier with some non-text inclusions, and haven't seen it get through. I'm trying again typing out some of the quoted pdf contents.Begin forwarded message:From: David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date: February 1, 2006 6:00:18 PM PSTTo: dev@geronimo.apache.orgSubject
I actually did read the spec and type in the classes once. (I think it
was for the timer spec...?)
I believe that if we do that, we have no problems because of the
copyright notice in the spec.
I've also discussed this issue regarding the lack of any recognizable
license for their code w/ B
