Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-27 Thread Prasad Kashyap
On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, the local module repository thing is a massive hack, not meant to be used as much as we are using it... and really it should *not* have SNAPSHOT artifacts in it. When using snaps in these local artifacts, strange artifact resolution

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-27 Thread Prasad Kashyap
On 2/27/07, Prasad Kashyap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, the local module repository thing is a massive hack, not meant to be used as much as we are using it... and really it should *not* have SNAPSHOT artifacts in it. When using snaps in

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-27 Thread Jason Dillon
On Feb 27, 2007, at 1:01 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: pom.xml: http://rifers.org/paste/show/3692 log: http://rifers.org/paste/show/3693 I think I am missing something very glaringly obvious here. Here's the glaringly obvious mistake I had made. Had set snaps to true and releases to false. Now

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-24 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hello, currently continuum is building and deploying to: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/ HTH, Matthias On 2/23/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK I think Matthias is watching this thread. Best wishes, Paul On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-24 Thread Paul McMahan
Excellent. Thanks Matthias! Best wishes, Paul On 2/24/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, currently continuum is building and deploying to: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/ HTH, Matthias On 2/23/07, Paul McMahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK I think

Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-23 Thread Jason Dillon
Folks, the local module repository thing is a massive hack, not meant to be used as much as we are using it... and really it should *not* have SNAPSHOT artifacts in it. When using snaps in these local artifacts, strange artifact resolution failures are bound to occur when Maven decides its

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-23 Thread Jason Dillon
Oh ya... insert :-) every few lines... :-P --jason On Feb 23, 2007, at 2:27 AM, Jason Dillon wrote: Folks, the local module repository thing is a massive hack, not meant to be used as much as we are using it... and really it should *not* have SNAPSHOT artifacts in it. When using snaps

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-23 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Jason, I just created a staging repo for the myfaces 12 snapshot things. We are working on getting the myfaces12 build by continuum every night. However, here the stage goes: http://people.apache.org/~matzew/myfaces12-stage/ -M On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, the

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-23 Thread Jason Dillon
Are you folks eventually going to merge these artifacts into the main apache repos? --jason On Feb 23, 2007, at 4:02 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Jason, I just created a staging repo for the myfaces 12 snapshot things. We are working on getting the myfaces12 build by continuum every

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-23 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
at least into the snapshot repo: http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/ On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you folks eventually going to merge these artifacts into the main apache repos? --jason On Feb 23, 2007, at 4:02 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-23 Thread Jason Dillon
Good, any idea when the 1.2.0-SNAPSHOT artifacts will make it into there? This would allow us to drop one of the module-local repos I was referring to. I'd rather not configure yet another remote repository URL though, and each time we do that it slows the build down, we've already got a

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-23 Thread Anita Kulshreshtha
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, the local module repository thing is... and really it should *not* have SNAPSHOT artifacts in it. I was tempted to change it 1.2.0-. Every morning my offline build fails in jasper config. I build jasper config

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-23 Thread Paul McMahan
There's a discussion right now on [EMAIL PROTECTED] about how to get their 1.2 snapshots published to the ASF snapshot repo. I'm inclined to leave the local repo in place for now since they appear to be close to a solution, just working out some permission bits on contiuum I think. But if there

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-23 Thread Jason Dillon
Why do they need the deploy automated by Continuum to get something out in the snap repo? Someone should publish the first set by hand now so we can consume them... --jason On Feb 23, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: There's a discussion right now on [EMAIL PROTECTED] about how

Re: Local module repos and SNAPSHOT artifacts

2007-02-23 Thread Paul McMahan
OK I think Matthias is watching this thread. Best wishes, Paul On 2/23/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do they need the deploy automated by Continuum to get something out in the snap repo? Someone should publish the first set by hand now so we can consume them... --jason On