On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 9:02 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
BTW, this includes my idea for wrapping non-bundle jars through the admin
console. I haven't tested this at all in case anyone wants to try it.
Basically if you try to deploy an artifact that isn't a bundle, it
I've fixed the obvious problem in the last source and am pushing a new one.
There might be memory consumption issues ran out of permgen trying to start
the server by itself, but I might not have my environment set up the same as
before so it might not be worse.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun
BTW, this includes my idea for wrapping non-bundle jars through the admin
console. I haven't tested this at all in case anyone wants to try it.
Basically if you try to deploy an artifact that isn't a bundle, it runs the jar
through the pax wrap url handler which uses bnd with very lenient
Forrest and everyone,
This last source drop should be good to run the tck against.
Aries as of rev 1132725 should be fine. Tim expects to be reverting one of the
fixes and reimplementing it in a better way, so if you build aries be sure the
svn revision is 1132725 or after tim's new fix.
Locally I've got to the same jcdi failures as trunk (after changes in aries,
OWB, and openejb). I just pushed a new source zip. DId this last tck run
complete? Do we need to do another one before committing the osgi changes?
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
On Jun 2, 2011, at 2:05 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
fyi, this looks like the cause of the corba failure:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: On a thread without an initialized context
at
org.apache.geronimo.openwebbeans.GeronimoSingletonService.getContext(GeronimoSingletonService.java:62)
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
Hi Forrest,
I've pushed today's source to people.apache.org. It compiles for me :-)
I just committed an update to OWB that makes it more
On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:52 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:22 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Forrest,
I've pushed today's source to people.apache.org. It compiles for me :-) I
Are you refresh the code from https://people.apache.org/~djencks/?
Here is the list that I built for dependencies:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/branches/0.3-RCx/util/
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/aries/branches/0.3-RCx/blueprint/
I just pushed another source zip which should fix a few more problems. Please
try it, we'll get slightly more reasonable results.
It all builds for me against current aries, owb, and openejb.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 2, 2011, at 7:44 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:52 PM,
The last two source uploads should only be using aries trunk. The aries
branches/0.3-RCx builds jars with the same version as trunk but they definitely
won't work.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 2, 2011, at 8:41 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
Are you refresh the code from
I ever encounter build problem on aries trunk, and now they are fixed, the
aries trunk artifacts now in my local repo. Just trigger a new server build,
and let's wait to see :)
Forrest
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 12:07 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
The last two source uploads should
On May 31, 2011, at 1:44 AM, David Jencks wrote:
The new aries proxy code also seems to consume significantly more permgen
space. I didn't investigate in detail but a full server runs out of permgen
space around half way through starting with 128 MB permgen. My server
started OK with
According to my recent experience, permsize=256m is kind of small for 3.0,
though the server could start, but it will fail during application
deployment from admin console after.
Forrest
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 31, 2011, at 1:44 AM,
On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Forrest Xia wrote:
According to my recent experience, permsize=256m is kind of small for 3.0,
though the server could start, but it will fail during application deployment
from admin console after.
All depends on your application size, of course... I expect
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:25 PM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
On May 31, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 31, 2011, at 1:44 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Locally I now have a server that runs eba-with-isolation using aries
trunk and fixes a lot of the tck problems
Hi Forrest,
I've pushed today's source to people.apache.org. It compiles for me :-) I
just committed an update to OWB that makes it more compatible with aries
proxying/weaving so you may want to build owb also.
I'll probably be around on and off tonight so if you run into problems soon I
On Jun 1, 2011, at 11:22 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Hi Forrest,
I've pushed today's source to people.apache.org. It compiles for me :-) I
just committed an update to OWB that makes it more compatible with aries
proxying/weaving so you may want to build owb also.
I'll probably be around
On May 31, 2011, at 1:44 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Locally I now have a server that runs eba-with-isolation using aries trunk
and fixes a lot of the tck problems that showed up with this version.
However due to a problem with aries proxies changing the SerialVersionUID if
it is not
On May 31, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On May 31, 2011, at 1:44 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Locally I now have a server that runs eba-with-isolation using aries trunk
and fixes a lot of the tck problems that showed up with this version.
However due to a problem with aries
Locally I now have a server that runs eba-with-isolation using aries trunk and
fixes a lot of the tck problems that showed up with this version. However due
to a problem with aries proxies changing the SerialVersionUID if it is not
hardcoded on every serializable class I've had to add
On May 18, 2011, at 8:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
This version had some problems such as the standalone commands (e.g. deploy)
and the app client not starting. I've fixed these and started integrating
the aries 0.3 eba-with-isolation stuff. The server starts for me but I
haven't tried
On May 18, 2011, at 8:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
This version had some problems such as the standalone commands (e.g. deploy)
and the app client not starting. I've fixed these and started integrating
the aries 0.3 eba-with-isolation stuff. The server starts for me but I
haven't tried
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:47 AM, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.comwrote:
This version had some problems such as the standalone commands (e.g.
deploy) and the app client not starting. I've fixed these and started
integrating the aries 0.3 eba-with-isolation stuff. The server starts for
me
This version had some problems such as the standalone commands (e.g. deploy)
and the app client not starting. I've fixed these and started integrating the
aries 0.3 eba-with-isolation stuff. The server starts for me but I haven't
tried anything with eba yet beyond seeing that the bundles
I will give a try in the tck env, and update any findings. Thanks
David for the quick fix.
Forrest
On 5/19/11, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
This version had some problems such as the standalone commands (e.g. deploy)
and the app client not starting. I've fixed these and started
I've run into too many problems getting the 3.0-osgi branch to work reliably so
I've started trying to port some of the important changes to trunk to make
trunk more osgi-friendly without eliminating so much of the geronimo
infrastructure. I think it may make sense to try to make the user
27 matches
Mail list logo
