Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-14 Thread David Blevins
Yanking my +1. The binaries are flawed. -David On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:53 PM, David Blevins wrote: Files uploaded! Here is my +1 baring any tck failures. -David On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: We are currently going through the final testing phases and have the binary im

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-14 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 from me. On 12/13/05, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are currently going through the final testing phases and have the binary > images available for review. These images represent what we will be making > available to users after we confirm the final set of tests. > > Please tak

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-14 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 +1 assuming the binaries pass the TCK Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote, On 12/13/2005 9:18 PM: > +1 assuming the binaries pass the TCK > > On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > >> We are currently going through the final testing phases and ha

RE: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-14 Thread Panda, Akshaya Kumar \(Cognizant\)
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 12/14/2005 11:05 AM To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries Uploading again... The connection was reset. On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:29 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > I assume david is still uploading? they aren't a

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-14 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi there, correction to my previous mail: 1) The strange split of all files between the two src archives was a failure on my side. Actually there are exactly the same files in both zip and tarball. 2) The problem with chopped off last characters in file names to some extent still exists, but it

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-14 Thread Aaron Mulder
This fix seems to have exposed an issue where the connector builder failed to deploy plans where no parent ID was specified (instead of using the configured default). David J and I have checked in a fix for that. I also fixed the problem where the j2ee-installer assembly failed on missing release

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-13 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi guys, unfortunately: -1 (non binding) Reason: The tarballs for source and bin are corrupt. They includes files with a missing last character in their name. I checked md5 of the downloads (OK). The zip seems OK. Some differences between the archives might be intentionally, but obviously not a

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-13 Thread Aaron Mulder
I'm sorry to say, but -1: the console has a dangling SNAPSHOT that means that no database pools can be deployed from the database pool portlet. I put all the blame on the guy who did the SNAPSHOT cleanup in the branch, who was, umm, me. :) I checked the fix in to the 1.0 branch. Aaron On 12/14

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-13 Thread Jason Dillon
Not gonna do a RCn series first? --jason On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: We are currently going through the final testing phases and have the binary images available for review. These images represent what we will be making available to users after we confirm the final

RE: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-13 Thread Panda, Akshaya Kumar \(Cognizant\)
] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries Uploading again... The connection was reset. On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:29 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > I assume david is still uploading? they aren't all there... > > On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > >> We are currently

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-13 Thread David Blevins
Files uploaded! Here is my +1 baring any tck failures. -David On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: We are currently going through the final testing phases and have the binary images available for review. These images represent what we will be making available to users after w

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-13 Thread David Blevins
Uploading again... The connection was reset. On Dec 13, 2005, at 9:29 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: I assume david is still uploading? they aren't all there... On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: We are currently going through the final testing phases and have the binary ima

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-13 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
I assume david is still uploading? they aren't all there... On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: We are currently going through the final testing phases and have the binary images available for review. These images represent what we will be making available to users after we c

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-13 Thread Jeff Genender
[X] +1 Release these binaries Matt Hogstrom wrote: We are currently going through the final testing phases and have the binary images available for review. These images represent what we will be making available to users after we confirm the final set of tests. Please take some time to downl

Re: [Vote] Geronimo V1.0 Release binaries

2005-12-13 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
+1 assuming the binaries pass the TCK On Dec 13, 2005, at 8:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: We are currently going through the final testing phases and have the binary images available for review. These images represent what we will be making available to users after we confirm the final set