On Apr 27, 2010, at 8:18 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> I don't know what happened but I see a bunch of "checksum failed"
> messages from maven when downloading yoko artifacts. I also downloaded
> some of these artifacts (without maven) and compared checksums and
> they do NOT match.
It looks like Bri
I don't know what happened but I see a bunch of "checksum failed"
messages from maven when downloading yoko artifacts. I also downloaded
some of these artifacts (without maven) and compared checksums and
they do NOT match.
Jarek
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
>
> On Apr 26,
On Apr 26, 2010, at 5:51 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Kevan,
>
> I've talked with Brian Fox and he says the checksums are recalculated when a
> staging repo is promoted. So, fixing them in the staging repo would have no
> lasting effect.
>
> Based on this would you be interested in revising y
Kevan,
I've talked with Brian Fox and he says the checksums are recalculated when a
staging repo is promoted. So, fixing them in the staging repo would have no
lasting effect.
Based on this would you be interested in revising your -1?
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 25, 2010, at 4:27 PM, David
The bad checksums seem to be because somehow maven 2.2.0 got installed on my
system. I have no idea why, but it's known to produce bad checksums.
I'll try to contact e.g. brian fox to see what we can do about them. I think
usually what has happened in the past is to promote, then fix, but mayb
I'm seeing one blocker issue -- all of the checksums that I have downloaded do
not match the corresponding checksums that I compute. For instance:
$ md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat
yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz.md5
md5sum yoko-1.1-source-release.tar.gz ; cat yoko-1.1-source-release
Um, here's my +1
david jencks
On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB
> and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading
> related code changes from previous yoko releases.
>
> Stagin
+1 Looks good.
-Donald
On 4/22/10 10:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
> Please vote on yoko 1.1, yoko with osgi support. It works enough so an ORB
> and HandleDelegate can be bound in jndi. There are no non-classloading
> related code changes from previous yoko releases.
>
> Staging repo:
>
> ht
+1
ran RAT and IANAL and built from source. RAT is giving a some failures,
but the failures are either missing copyrights in NOTICES.vm and
LEGAL.vm files or in the source files that are directly generated from
the idl files. I don't think either problem is serious enough to
require a redo,
