My only thoughts on this are...
+1
On Jun 6, 2008, at 11:04 AM, Joseph Leong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've been tossing the idea around in my head of taking the
initiative to upgrade the current items written in Dojo to 1.1.1, I
know we still have some Dojo 0.4.3, which
Would this let us remove Dojo 0.4.3 from the server or would we keep it
there for users who might still be using it? If so, how long are we going
to do that for? My vote would be to yank it out after we're no longer
dependent on it, but I'm not sure what the community at large would think of
On Jun 6, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Jason Warner wrote:
Would this let us remove Dojo 0.4.3 from the server or would we keep
it there for users who might still be using it? If so, how long are
we going to do that for? My vote would be to yank it out after
we're no longer dependent on it, but
+1 for trunk.
Can you also move the older versions out of trunk and into the
geronimo/plugins branch, so people can optionally install them if their
app still needs them?
If you're wanting to also do this in branches/2.1, then we need to keep
the older version in the server images, so we
+1 for trunk too. I agree w/ Kevan that we should use versions for
dojo. Maybe we could collect a list of portlets/pages that are using
dojo and migrate each of them gradually to track the progress?
Lin
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for trunk.
Can
Kevan,
Actually I think the current 1.x version in trunk is 1.1.0, which is fully
compatible with 1.1.1... as a result of this, it can just be upgraded in the
'dojo' plugin and be kept at the path of just /dojo
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jun 6,
And, erm...
To further expand...
I think having different versions of dojo in our plugins repository would be
a good idea, at least having 0.4.x branch as well as the 1.x branch, with
the latest being at /dojo, and any other (legacy) versions being installed
would have a path of /dojo-x.x or
On Jun 6, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
+1 for trunk.
I was assuming trunk in my discussion.
Can you also move the older versions out of trunk and into the
geronimo/plugins branch, so people can optionally install them if
their app still needs them?
If you're wanting to
Ok great, so now there's a starting point. Seems the community is in favor,
so i'll start going through and inventorying what we have currently running
in what parts of AG and see if i can propose a plan for changes so the work
can be parallelize should others want to jump in. Also, to track
