Re: Web Console - JVM portlet

2005-08-06 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
Joe Bohn wrote, On 8/3/2005 5:58 AM: Do we need this type of detail about the JVM in an administrative portlet (see the JVM portlet under Server)? This seems to be a bit over the top. IMO this is especially true when listing the details on the OS, Sun (will this even work if we're not using

Re: Web Console - JVM portlet

2005-08-06 Thread Matt Hogstrom
I think the more information availble the better. I haven't looked at the page but perhaps we can organize it a bit better. Matt - Original Message - From: "Alan D. Cabrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 1:07 PM Subject: Re: Web Console

Re: Web Console - JVM portlet

2005-08-06 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Matt Hogstrom wrote: I think the more information availble the better. I haven't looked at the page but perhaps we can organize it a bit better. How about renaming it to "System Properties" as that seems to be what it contains and then breaking the monolithic page down into one sub-page per

Re: Web Console - JVM portlet

2005-08-06 Thread Matt Hogstrom
Jeremy Boynes wrote: Matt Hogstrom wrote: I think the more information availble the better. I haven't looked at the page but perhaps we can organize it a bit better. How about renaming it to "System Properties" as that seems to be what it contains and then breaking the monolithic page do