Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenTracing 1.0.2

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 25/02/2019 08:46, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > Here is the vote for our opentracing+microprofile impl v1.0.2. > > Staging repository is available > at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1088 > Sources can be found > at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.6

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 25/02/2019 08:51, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > Here is the vote for our openapi+microprofile integration impl 1.0.6. > > Staging repo is available > at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1089 > Sources are > here:  > h

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Safeguard 1.2.1

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 25/02/2019 09:27, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > here is the vote for Geronimo Safeguard 1.2.1, > > the only change in is the following one - but guarantees we are spec > compliant: > > > Major Bug GERONIMO-6674 >

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Safeguard 1.2.1

Hi guys, here is the vote for Geronimo Safeguard 1.2.1, the only change in is the following one - but guarantees we are spec compliant: [image: Major] [image: Bug] GERONIMO-6674 @Retry with jitter = 0 generates error

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Metrics 1.0.3

Hi guys, here is the vote for our metrics impl 1.0.3. Changelog is: [image: Minor] [image: Improvement] GERONIMO-6680 Add a beans.xml in extension to simplify the scanning in multiple servers

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Jwt Auth 1.0.2

Hi guys, here is the vote for Apache Geronimo Jwt Auth 1.0.2. Here changelog has one issue - who popped up on openwebbeans bugtracker originally: [image: Bug] GERONIMO-6697 Ensure issuer in the JWT is optional

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo Config 1.2.2

Hi guys, here is the vote for Geronimo Config 1.2.2, the only change in is the following one: PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatusDevelopment [image: Major] [image: Bug] GERONIMO-6696 Support Optional> and Provider> injections

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.6

Hi guys, Here is the vote for our openapi+microprofile integration impl 1.0.6. Staging repo is available at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1089 Sources are here: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1089/org/apache/geronimo/ger

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenTracing 1.0.2

Hi guys, Here is the vote for our opentracing+microprofile impl v1.0.2. Staging repository is available at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1088 Sources can be found at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1088/org/apache/geronim

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenTracing 1.0.2

PS: indeed please vote +1 or -1 (with a reason) and vote will be open for 3 days as usual Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: Release train?

Yep, opentracing and openapi are identified Le dim. 24 févr. 2019 à 22:48, Ivan Junckes Filho a écrit : > Hi Romain, I would love if the schema changes and the "in" ticket from > openapi are in this M3 release, is that possible? > > On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 11:53 AM Romai

Re: Release train?

Hi Romain, I would love if the schema changes and the "in" ticket from openapi are in this M3 release, is that possible? On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 11:53 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, several users asked for some release in MP land, anything you are > working on or would

Release train?

Hi guys, several users asked for some release in MP land, anything you are working on or would like in? I will likely start it tomorrow if I find a slot for it. On my side I will import the docker/config code I mentionned in another thread in between. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <ht

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5

Which makes 6 +1 (3 bindings) and no other vote so this vote passes, thank you all guys. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5

My own +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 28.01.2019 um 15:25 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > As requested last week, here is the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5 vote. > > Staging repo can be found at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1087/ > Tag is at > https:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5

+1 thanks! El lun., 28 ene. 2019 a las 10:08, Jean-Baptiste Onofré () escribió: > +1 (non binding) > > Thanks, > Regards > JB > > On 28/01/2019 15:25, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > As requested last week, here is the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5 vote. > > > > Staging repo can be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5

+1 (non binding) Thanks, Regards JB On 28/01/2019 15:25, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > As requested last week, here is the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5 vote. > > Staging repo can be found > at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1087/ > Tag is > at 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5

+1 thanks Romain On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:38 PM Raymond Auge wrote: > +1 > > - Ray > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:25 AM Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> As requested last week, here is the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5 vote. >> >> Staging repo can be found at >> https://repositor

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5

+1 - Ray On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 9:25 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > As requested last week, here is the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5 vote. > > Staging repo can be found at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1087/ > Tag is at > https://gitbox.ap

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5

Hi guys, As requested last week, here is the Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.5 vote. Staging repo can be found at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1087/ Tag is at https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geronimo-openapi.git;a=commit;h=eea43f1f245222567f51bb53bef3d877

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Microprofile Aggregator 1.0.1

and my +1 which makes 5 +1 (3 bindings), will continue the release steps ASAP Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.4 (take 2 - enum fix included)

and my +1 which makes 5 +1 (3 bindings), will continue the release steps asap Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Microprofile Aggregator 1.0.1

+1 Le jeu. 10 janv. 2019 à 11:36, Ivan Junckes Filho a écrit : > +1 > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 09/01/2019 14:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > Here is the annouced vote for our micropro

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.4 (take 2 - enum fix included)

Hi guys, >> > >> > We already have a few fixes which can be blocker for some users so i'd >> > like to release our MP openapi impl. Here are the issues we fixed - and >> > the enum fix i mentionned in previous vote is in: >> > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Microprofile Aggregator 1.0.1

+1 On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:03 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 09/01/2019 14:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > Here is the annouced vote for our microprofile aggregator project. Here > > are the fixed issues: > > > > P T Key

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.4 (take 2 - enum fix included)

+1 On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:02 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 09/01/2019 14:09, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > We already have a few fixes which can be blocker for some users so i'd > > li

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Microprofile Aggregator 1.0.1

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 09/01/2019 14:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > Here is the annouced vote for our microprofile aggregator project. Here > are the fixed issues: > > P T Key Summary AssigneeStatus Development > Major Bug GERONIMO-6668 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.4 (take 2 - enum fix included)

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 09/01/2019 14:09, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > We already have a few fixes which can be blocker for some users so i'd > like to release our MP openapi impl. Here are the issues we fixed - and > the enum fix i mentionned in previou

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Microprofile Aggregator 1.0.1

+1 - Ray On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:17 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > Here is the annouced vote for our microprofile aggregator project. Here > are the fixed issues: > > PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatusDevelopment > [image: Major] [image: Bug] GERONIMO-6668 >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.4 (take 2 - enum fix included)

+1 - Ray On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 8:10 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > We already have a few fixes which can be blocker for some users so i'd > like to release our MP openapi impl. Here are the issues we fixed - and the > enum fix i mentionned in

[VOTE] Release Apache Microprofile Aggregator 1.0.1

Hi guys, Here is the annouced vote for our microprofile aggregator project. Here are the fixed issues: PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatusDevelopment [image: Major] [image: Bug] GERONIMO-6668 OpenAPI version requires jackson but it is not provided

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.4 (take 2 - enum fix included)

Hi guys, We already have a few fixes which can be blocker for some users so i'd like to release our MP openapi impl. Here are the issues we fixed - and the enum fix i mentionned in previous vote is in: PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatusDevelopment [image: Major] [image: Improvement] GERONIMO-6675 &

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.4

t : > Thanks Romain > > +1 > > Le mer. 9 janv. 2019 à 12:04, Romain Manni-Bucau > a écrit : > >> Hi guys, >> >> We already have a few fixes which can be blocker for some users so i'd >> like to release our MP openapi impl. Here are the issues

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.4

Thanks Romain +1 Le mer. 9 janv. 2019 à 12:04, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > We already have a few fixes which can be blocker for some users so i'd > like to release our MP openapi impl. Here are the issues we fixed: > > PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatusDeve

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo OpenAPI 1.0.4

Hi guys, We already have a few fixes which can be blocker for some users so i'd like to release our MP openapi impl. Here are the issues we fixed: PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatusDevelopment [image: Major] [image: Improvement] GERONIMO-6675 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6675

Re: next release cycle // microprofile

Small update: we need OWB 2.0.9 to do this bulk release, will work on that which can delay a little bit G releases but it is in progress Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibuca

Re: next release cycle // microprofile

up :), here is the proposal plan I can do - planning to do it in a single repo so it would be an all or nothing release: 1. release all impl with changes this week (week of the 17th) 2. release the aggregator this week as well On 2. I wonder if TomEE guys want to have a look to be able to use

Re: next release cycle // microprofile

think we need minor updates for Config and OpenTracing. >> Plus, we need to figure out what to do with Fault Tolerance. Sometime ago, >> there was a discussion about dropping Safeguard and replace it with a >> custom implementation. >> >> Thank you! >> >> Ch

Re: next release cycle // microprofile

ropping Safeguard and replace it with a custom >> implementation. >> >> Thank you! >> >> Cheers, >> Roberto >> >>> On 16 Nov 2018, at 08:58, Romain Manni-Bucau >> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> He

Re: next release cycle // microprofile

a custom implementation. Thank you! Cheers, Roberto On 16 Nov 2018, at 08:58, Romain Manni-Bucau mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hey guys, We did some changes in the microprofile libs, mainly extracting the common logic, i wonder what we want to ta

Re: next release cycle // microprofile

changes in the microprofile libs, mainly extracting the common > logic, i wonder what we want to target next and when do we plan to release > it? > I can likely drive some of them in the coming weeks > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau

Re: next release cycle // microprofile

with a custom implementation. Thank you! Cheers, Roberto > On 16 Nov 2018, at 08:58, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hey guys, > > We did some changes in the microprofile libs, mainly extracting the common > logic, i wonder what we want to target next and when do we plan to r

next release cycle // microprofile

Hey guys, We did some changes in the microprofile libs, mainly extracting the common logic, i wonder what we want to target next and when do we plan to release it? I can likely drive some of them in the coming weeks Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.12 release

which makes 4 +1 (3 bindings) so this vote passes, thank you all guys Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.12 release

and my own +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.12 release

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 30/10/2018 13:33, Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 29.10.2018 um 13:55 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : >> >> Hello everyone, >> Here is the vote to let us get asm7 final out. >> >> The dist (dev) area is available at >> https://dist.apache.o

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.12 release

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 29.10.2018 um 13:55 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hello everyone, > Here is the vote to let us get asm7 final out. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ (rev 30487) > The staging repo is: > https://repositor

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.12 release

+1 - Ray On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 8:55 AM Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hello everyone, > Here is the vote to let us get asm7 final out. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ (rev 30487) > The staging repo is: > https://repository.apache.o

[VOTE] Apache XBean 4.12 release

Hello everyone, Here is the vote to let us get asm7 final out. The dist (dev) area is available at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ (rev 30487) The staging repo is: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1073 Tag is http://svn.apache.org/repos/as

Re: xbean release with asm 7 final?

+1 It makes sense to me. I already prepared Karaf upgrade to ASM7 (and pax web as well). I'm ready to test xbean release. Thanks. Regards JB On 29/10/2018 09:02, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > asm 7 just got released, what about releasing xbean after the upgrade? >

xbean release with asm 7 final?

Hi guys, asm 7 just got released, what about releasing xbean after the upgrade? If i get a few +1 i'll launch it today (worse case we can cancel it since it takes 3 days to pass ;)) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old

Spec API release request

Hello Geronimo team, I am building an OSGi project which depends on the new contract capabilities that have been added across the Geronimo spec jars. Is there any chance that the following spec jars could be released? Many Thanks, Tim org.apache.geronimo.specs

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

And with my +1 it makes 7 +1 (5 bindings) so this vote passes, i'll continue the release steps. Thank you all! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Git

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

+1 Le jeu. 4 oct. 2018 à 06:38, David Blevins a écrit : > +1 > > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dblevins > http://www.tomitribe.com > > On Oct 3, 2018, at 12:11 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > Hello everyone, > Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiver

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

+1 -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On Oct 3, 2018, at 12:11 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hello everyone, > Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiversion jar > scanning. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https://

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

+1 - Ray On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:07 AM Łukasz Dywicki wrote: > Although not binding, here is +1 from me too :-) > > Cheers, > Lukasz > > On 10/3/18 12:22 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > > +1 > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > >> Am 03.10.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > >> > >> +1 (

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

Although not binding, here is +1 from me too :-) Cheers, Lukasz On 10/3/18 12:22 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 03.10.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré : >> >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 03/10/2018 09:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>> H

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 03.10.2018 um 10:57 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré : > > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 03/10/2018 09:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiversion >> jar scanning. >> >> The dist

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 03/10/2018 09:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiversion > jar scanning. > > The dist (dev) area is available > at _https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ >

[VOTE] Apache XBean 4.11 release

Hello everyone, Here is the vote to let us get asm7 shade and a fix in the multiversion jar scanning. The dist (dev) area is available at *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/ * (rev 29854) The staging repo is: https://repos

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.10

yone mind if I > immediately cut the XBean 4.11 now? > > The work has been done for 2 months and I was hoping to get this into a TomEE > release soon. Hopefully TomEE 8 will be cut in the next days. > > > -- > David Blevins > http://twitter.com/dble

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.10

Can we do a reroll with XBEAN-309 included? Sans that does anyone mind if I immediately cut the XBean 4.11 now? The work has been done for 2 months and I was hoping to get this into a TomEE release soon. Hopefully TomEE 8 will be cut in the next days. -- David Blevins http://twitter.com

Re: coming g-validation release?

7:44 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > bval needs a release of our spec jar (v2), anyone able to work on the > javadoc soon or should i launch the release in the coming day(s)? > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release XBean 4.10

Which makes 4 +1 (3 bindings) and no other votes so this release passes. I'll continue with the release steps ASAP. Thanks guys. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wor

Re: coming g-validation release?

please go for it! I've validated the signature and it's fine. LieGrue, strub > Am 29.09.2018 um 17:44 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > bval needs a release of our spec jar (v2), anyone able to work on the javadoc > soon or should i launch the

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.10

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 26.09.2018 um 10:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2.1 which contains some java 11 fixes > (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-311). Here is the vote to > promote it. > > The dist (dev) area is available at > https:/

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.10

+1 - Ray On Sat, Sep 29, 2018, 11:22 Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: > My own +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github > | LinkedI

coming g-validation release?

Hi guys, bval needs a release of our spec jar (v2), anyone able to work on the javadoc soon or should i launch the release in the coming day(s)? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Ol

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.10

My own +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 4.10

+1 (non binding) Regards JB Le 26 sept. 2018 à 04:12, à 04:12, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit: >Hi guys, > >XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2.1 which contains some java 11 fixes ( >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-311). Here is the vote to >promote it. > >The dist (dev) area is available at

[VOTE] Release XBean 4.10

Hi guys, XBean got asm upgraded to 6.2.1 which contains some java 11 fixes ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-311). Here is the vote to promote it. The dist (dev) area is available at *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/xbean/

xbean release for asm 6.2.1

Hi guys, any objection to release xbean to upgrade asm to 6.2.1? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibuc

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Specs: interceptor 1.2 v1.1, el 2.2 v1.1, atinject 1.0 v1.1, annotation 1.3 v1.1, cdi 2.0 v1.1, jaxrs 2.1 v1.1, jbatch 1.0 v1.1, validation 2.0 v1.1, json 1.1 v1.1, jsonb 1

>>> > >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > Romain Manni-Bucau >>> > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book >>> > >>> > >>> > Le mar. 28 août 2018 à 19:30, Raymond Auge >>> a écrit : >>&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Specs: interceptor 1.2 v1.1, el 2.2 v1.1, atinject 1.0 v1.1, annotation 1.3 v1.1, cdi 2.0 v1.1, jaxrs 2.1 v1.1, jbatch 1.0 v1.1, validation 2.0 v1.1, json 1.1 v1.1, jsonb 1

>> >> >> > Am 30.08.2018 um 11:07 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >> > >> > +1 >> > >> > Romain Manni-Bucau >> > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book >> > >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Specs: interceptor 1.2 v1.1, el 2.2 v1.1, atinject 1.0 v1.1, annotation 1.3 v1.1, cdi 2.0 v1.1, jaxrs 2.1 v1.1, jbatch 1.0 v1.1, validation 2.0 v1.1, json 1.1 v1.1, jsonb 1

LinkedIn | Book > > > > > > Le mar. 28 août 2018 à 19:30, Raymond Auge a > écrit : > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to call a vote on the release of the following specs: > > > > interceptor 1.2 v1.1 > > ** Sub-task > > * [GERONIMO-66

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Specs: interceptor 1.2 v1.1, el 2.2 v1.1, atinject 1.0 v1.1, annotation 1.3 v1.1, cdi 2.0 v1.1, jaxrs 2.1 v1.1, jbatch 1.0 v1.1, validation 2.0 v1.1, json 1.1 v1.1, jsonb 1

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 30.08.2018 um 11:07 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1 > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le mar. 28 août 2018 à 19:30, Raymond Auge a écrit > : > Hi, > > I'

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Specs: interceptor 1.2 v1.1, el 2.2 v1.1, atinject 1.0 v1.1, annotation 1.3 v1.1, cdi 2.0 v1.1, jaxrs 2.1 v1.1, jbatch 1.0 v1.1, validation 2.0 v1.1, json 1.1 v1.1, jsonb 1

Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mar. 28 août 2018 à 19:30, Raymond Auge a écrit : > Hi, > > I'd like to call a vote on the release of the following specs: > > *interceptor 1.2 v1.1* > ** Sub-task > * [G

[VOTE] Release Geronimo Specs: interceptor 1.2 v1.1, el 2.2 v1.1, atinject 1.0 v1.1, annotation 1.3 v1.1, cdi 2.0 v1.1, jaxrs 2.1 v1.1, jbatch 1.0 v1.1, validation 2.0 v1.1, json 1.1 v1.1, jsonb 1.0 v

Hi, I'd like to call a vote on the release of the following specs: *interceptor 1.2 v1.1* ** Sub-task * [GERONIMO-6628] - Apply Portable Java Contracts: Interceptor 1.2 * [GERONIMO-6635] - Consume Portable Java Contracts: Interceptor 1.2 *el 2.2 v1.1* ** Sub-task * [GERONIMO

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.1

And with my +1 it makes 4 +1 (3 bindings) so this vote passes, will continue the release steps, thank you all guys. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com&g

Re: [VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.1

+1 LieGrue,strub On Monday, 27 August 2018, 11:13:29 CEST, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: +1 Le lun. 20 août 2018 à 04:04, Raymond Auge a écrit : +1 (non-binding) - Ray On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, 10:44 Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: Hi guys, As mentionned on the list I'd like to release A

Re: [VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.1

+1 Le lun. 20 août 2018 à 04:04, Raymond Auge a écrit : > +1 (non-binding) > > - Ray > > On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, 10:44 Romain Manni-Bucau, > wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> As mentionned on the list I'd like to release Apache Geronimo Simple >> JCac

Re: [VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.1

+1 (non-binding) - Ray On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, 10:44 Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: > Hi guys, > > As mentionned on the list I'd like to release Apache Geronimo Simple > JCache 1.0.1. > It fixes some serious bugs in the cdi setup (not working OOTB) and default > properties ha

[VOTE] Release Simple JCache 1.0.1

Hi guys, As mentionned on the list I'd like to release Apache Geronimo Simple JCache 1.0.1. It fixes some serious bugs in the cdi setup (not working OOTB) and default properties handling (uri was hard to use). Here is the complete changelog: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote

[RESULT][VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1 (take 2)

And with my +1 it makes 3 +1 bindings and 5 +1 overall so this vote passes. Thank you all guys. I will proceed with the next steps. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1 (take 2)

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 16.08.2018 um 10:12 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > Voted on the wrong email thread. > > +1 > > Le mer. 15 août 2018 à 17:05, jgallimore a > écrit : > +1 > > Jon > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Development-f342155.html

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1 (take 2)

Voted on the wrong email thread. +1 Le mer. 15 août 2018 à 17:05, jgallimore a écrit : > +1 > > Jon > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Development-f342155.html >

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

; > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > > > Am 29.07.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > As mentionned on the list, I'd like to release the v1.0.1 of our

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1 (take 2)

+1 Jon -- Sent from: http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Development-f342155.html

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

; @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book > > > Le mar. 14 août 2018 à 08:48, Mark Struberg a écrit : > +1 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 29.07.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > > > Hi guys, > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > As mentionned on the list, I'd like to release the v1.0.1 of our > Microprofile OpenAPI implementation to ensure we can use it without jackson. > > > > The dist (dev) area is

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 29.07.2018 um 16:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Hi guys, > > As mentionned on the list, I'd like to release the v1.0.1 of our Microprofile > OpenAPI implementation to ensure we can use it without jackson. > > The dist (dev) ar

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1 (take 2)

+1 - Ray On Wed, Aug 1, 2018, 08:48 Romain Manni-Bucau, wrote: > Hi guys, > > As mentionned on the list, I'd still like to release the v1.0.1 of our > Microprofile OpenAPI implementation to ensure we can use it without > jackson. It also includes several small fi

[VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1 (take 2)

Hi guys, As mentionned on the list, I'd still like to release the v1.0.1 of our Microprofile OpenAPI implementation to ensure we can use it without jackson. It also includes several small fixes about the output openapi.json (like ignoring annotation defaults, better tolerance of loosely

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

, Raymond Auge a > écrit : > >> +1 >> >> - Ray >> >> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018, 08:32 Jean-Baptiste Onofré, >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non binding) >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On 29/07/2018 16:17, Romain Man

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

>> JB >> >> On 29/07/2018 16:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> > Hi guys, >> > >> > As mentionned on the list, I'd like to release the v1.0.1 of our >> > Microprofile OpenAPI implementation to ensure we can use it without >> jackson. >&

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

+1 - Ray On Mon, Jul 30, 2018, 08:32 Jean-Baptiste Onofré, wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On 29/07/2018 16:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > As mentionned on the list, I'd like to release the v1.0.1 of our > > M

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

+1 (non binding) Regards JB On 29/07/2018 16:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > As mentionned on the list, I'd like to release the v1.0.1 of our > Microprofile OpenAPI implementation to ensure we can use it without jackson. > > The dist (dev) area is available

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

+1 Le dim. 29 juil. 2018 à 16:17, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > Hi guys, > > As mentionned on the list, I'd like to release the v1.0.1 of our > Microprofile OpenAPI implementation to ensure we can use it without jackson. > > The dist (dev) area is available

[VOTE] Release OpenAPI 1.0.1

Hi guys, As mentionned on the list, I'd like to release the v1.0.1 of our Microprofile OpenAPI implementation to ensure we can use it without jackson. The dist (dev) area is available at (rev 28414): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/openapi/ The staging repo is:

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >