@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proposed Branch and Release Schedule for Geronimo 2.0
On Jul 31, 2007, at 11:37 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
It looks like we're winding down and readying for the 2.0 release
that is long awaited. I've been working on something at work for
the last week
On Jul 31, 2007, at 11:37 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
It looks like we're winding down and readying for the 2.0 release
that is long awaited. I've been working on something at work for
the last week that has kept me a little distracted from G so
apologies if I missed something in a
All,
It looks like we're winding down and readying for the 2.0 release
that is long awaited. I've been working on something at work for the
last week that has kept me a little distracted from G so apologies if
I missed something in a thread.
There are lots of supporting elements that
with 4.0.3. Any idea when 4.1 is
going
to
be out? Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a6630219
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
like this is changed now with 4.0.3. Any idea when
4.1 is
going
to
be out? Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a6630219
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
On 11/6/06, Vadim Pesochinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Any updates on when 4.1 will be ready?
The code's been ready a while now (rather like 4.0.2)- we just need to
wait for the 4.0.2 release to get out, then we can call a vote for 4.1
--
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Hi!
Any updates on when 4.1 will be ready?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a7203972
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a6630219
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a6643855
Sent from
? Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a6630219
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com
if I should hold off!
On 10/3/06, Vadim Pesochinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi James,
It looks like this is changed now with 4.0.3. Any idea when 4.1 is going
to
be out? Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a6630219
Sent from
Hi James,
It looks like this is changed now with 4.0.3. Any idea when 4.1 is going to
be out? Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a6630219
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a6630219
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
I am wondering what would be the estimate date for 4.1 release?
Do we have an idea of when and what releases are going to happen?
How many more 4.0.x releases will we have?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Release-schedule-tf2124265.html#a5860619
Sent from
On 8/17/06, Vadim Pesochinsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am wondering what would be the estimate date for 4.1 release?
Do we have an idea of when and what releases are going to happen?
How many more 4.0.x releases will we have?
Now that 4.0.2 is pretty much out (the vote on the Incubator PMC
On 9/18/05, Jacek Laskowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd vote for 0.5.0 if JIRA (or any other source) would be appropriately
updated so that one could see what it really means. Of course, at the
moment, 0.5.0 is as good to me as 0.7.5 or even 0.7.7.9 ;)
+1
On Sep 16, 2005, at 10:55 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
To get some discussion going on release schedules... What version
should we have the eclipse plugin at? Currently it stands at 1.0.0.
To give you some background
[SNIP]
Thanks for the info. I'm rather baffled that eclipse doesn't
Sachin Patel wrote:
So what does everyone prefer?
(1) We keep 1.0.0, and have our final driver with or after WTP hits 1.0
so our official version is based on the WTP 1.0 offical version. On
this 1.0.0 release the update manager will be available as a primary
means of installing this
the previous version.
One other issue is do we want an official version for 1.0? The plugins
WTP requirement won't have their 1.0 release until around December. So
it will have to be based on a milestone driver of WTP. The WTP release
schedule is as follows:
M8-9/23
M9-11/18
1.0-by EOY
So what
18 matches
Mail list logo