Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-11-02 Thread frapien
are there any new release plans for 2.2? 3Q2009 is over and needs an update under http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxPMGT/geronimo-22-release-status.html -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/There%27s-still-hope-for-2.2...-tp25395776s134p26156696.html Sent from the Apache Geronimo - D

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-10-19 Thread Jack Cai
David, are you working on a new TranQL release in order to include the stale connection patch? -Jack On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Donald Woods wrote: > Just rolled back to the 1.7 level of javamail. > > Also, Jarek updated the openejbVersion to 3.1.2. > > > -Donald > > > > Donald Woods wrot

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-10-15 Thread Donald Woods
Just rolled back to the 1.7 level of javamail. Also, Jarek updated the openejbVersion to 3.1.2. -Donald Donald Woods wrote: Agree, if that is the last set of artifacts holding up the release, then we can roll back to 1.7. -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: I did upgrade th

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-10-13 Thread Donald Woods
Agree, if that is the last set of artifacts holding up the release, then we can roll back to 1.7. -Donald Rick McGuire wrote: Donald Woods wrote: I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has checked in several fixes in the past few months I'm not sure those fixes are

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-10-13 Thread Rick McGuire
Donald Woods wrote: I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has checked in several fixes in the past few months I'm not sure those fixes are worth spinning a new javamail release just for inclusion on the 2.2 release. Rick -Donald David Jencks wrote: We may be abl

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-10-13 Thread Donald Woods
I did upgrade the javamail version to 1.8-SNAPSHOT, as Rick has checked in several fixes in the past few months -Donald David Jencks wrote: We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting ver

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-10-13 Thread Donald Woods
AMQ 5.3.0 and Jetty v7 have been released. http://www.h-online.com/open/Jetty-7-arrives-from-Eclipse-and-Webtide--/news/114427 -Donald David Jencks wrote: We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is ge

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-14 Thread Jack Cai
I finished the patch for the console filter to improve its performance: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4874 Hopefully someone could review it... -Jack On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > >> I'm stil

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-14 Thread Forrest Xia
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Donald Woods wrote: > I'm still working on Daytrader 2.2, but could use some help updating and > testing the Daytrader plugins and plans. > > > -Donald Donald, once you roll out all of changes on daytrader 2.2, I will have a testing on it.

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-14 Thread Forrest Xia
Hope someone could look into https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4222. It's an important reliability issue about db connectivity.

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-14 Thread Donald Woods
I'm still working on Daytrader 2.2, but could use some help updating and testing the Daytrader plugins and plans. -Donald Forrest Xia wrote: I am working on G 2.2 samples. Basically, I hope the existing G 2.2 samples plugins could be installable and runable on G 2.2 server. I will post my

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-14 Thread Forrest Xia
I am working on G 2.2 samples. Basically, I hope the existing G 2.2 samples plugins could be installable and runable on G 2.2 server. I will post my results here soon.

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-14 Thread Ivan
Is there an approximate date of Geronimo 2.2 release ? I remembered that last time, what I got is in the early October. Thanks ! 2009/9/14 Jack Cai > I'm working on improving the console filter performance. Will open a > JIRA... > > -Jack > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Quintin Beukes wr

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-13 Thread Jack Cai
I'm working on improving the console filter performance. Will open a JIRA... -Jack On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Quintin Beukes wrote: > There are some bugs I reported regarding adding/removing connectors. I > seriously think they need to be addressed. They are: > https://issues.apache.org/ji

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-11 Thread Quintin Beukes
There are some bugs I reported regarding adding/removing connectors. I seriously think they need to be addressed. They are: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4867 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1070 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4860 https://issues.apach

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-11 Thread Ivan
Sorry, I make a mistaken, I did not mean https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4603, I mean GERONIMO-4625 2009/9/11 Ivan > I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801 > Pl

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-11 Thread Shawn Jiang
I'm working on https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4852 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4851 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4850 And hopefully they can be included in G22 On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Ivan wrote: > I wish those JIRAs to be included

Re: There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-11 Thread Ivan
I wish those JIRAs to be included in Geronimo 2.2 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4801 Please check my comment, I think we could just ignore the alreadyexisted exception https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4821 Please check my comment, I need more help on it :-( https:/

There's still hope for 2.2...

2009-09-10 Thread David Jencks
We may be able to release 2.2 soon. Activemq has fixed the last bug we had problems with and is fast approaching a release, openejb is getting very close to a release for 2.2, and I've started votes on a number of our snapshot dependencies. At this point I'd like anyone who is working on s