Re: TranQL/OpenEJB enforce-foreign-key-constraints

2005-06-12 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Aaron Mulder wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote: They are based on the info in the logical data model which for now is defined by the relationships in the EJB model and not by the database. The architecture allows for the separation of the three models (front-end (EJB), logical a

Re: TranQL/OpenEJB enforce-foreign-key-constraints

2005-06-12 Thread Aaron Mulder
On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > They are based on the info in the logical data model which for now is > defined by the relationships in the EJB model and not by the database. > The architecture allows for the separation of the three models > (front-end (EJB), logical and back-end (DB

Re: TranQL/OpenEJB enforce-foreign-key-constraints

2005-06-12 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Aaron Mulder wrote: So in your CMP settings, you can include the enforce-foreign-key-constraints setting. This ultimately causes TranQL to use either a SimpleFlushStrategy or an EnforceRelationshipsFlushStrategy. I just want to double-check my understanding of this. Is it the

Re: TranQL/OpenEJB enforce-foreign-key-constraints

2005-06-12 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Jun 12, 2005, at 7:18 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote: So in your CMP settings, you can include the enforce-foreign-key-constraints setting. This ultimately causes TranQL to use either a SimpleFlushStrategy or an EnforceRelationshipsFlushStrategy. I just want to double-check my understanding

TranQL/OpenEJB enforce-foreign-key-constraints

2005-06-12 Thread Aaron Mulder
So in your CMP settings, you can include the enforce-foreign-key-constraints setting. This ultimately causes TranQL to use either a SimpleFlushStrategy or an EnforceRelationshipsFlushStrategy. I just want to double-check my understanding of this. Is it the case that this control