Re: Why rewind? (Re: Let's rewind!!! (Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project)

2006-02-03 Thread James Strachan
On 2 Feb 2006, at 20:51, Noel J. Bergman wrote: James Strachan wrote: Given it fits nicely with the existing ServiceMix incubation proposal I see no need for a new proposal for a donation of code to an existing incubating project. We don't start to incubate a chicken, and then import a barnya

Re: Why rewind? (Re: Let's rewind!!! (Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project)

2006-02-02 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James Strachan wrote: > > We were first voting to see if the servicemix community and geronimo > PMC were willing to accept the donation. Given it fits nicely with > the existing ServiceMix incubation proposal I see no need for a new > proposal

Re: Why rewind? (Re: Let's rewind!!! (Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project)

2006-02-02 Thread Davanum Srinivas
James, With my Geronimo PMC member hat on. i've already cast my VOTE (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=geronimo-dev&m=113889773909505&w=2). Now that i have your attention :) and i have a bit more information that i did not have before, but i still think a standalone BPEL vibrant project is a neces

Why rewind? (Re: Let's rewind!!! (Re: [VOTE] accept donation of a business process engine into the ServiceMix project)

2006-02-02 Thread James Strachan
On 2 Feb 2006, at 18:36, Davanum Srinivas wrote: Folks, There is no proposal, there is just a zip, unless someone is a clairvoyant, we can't figure out things like. We were first voting to see if the servicemix community and geronimo PMC were willing to accept the donation. Given it fits nic