The issue with the tck tests ended up being a bug in cxf 2.0.6. CXF has
a fix that is currently included in 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT. If we give them the
green light they will push a release soon.
At this point I'm trying to decide the best course of action. If you
have an opinion please speak up:
On Jul 22, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
The issue with the tck tests ended up being a bug in cxf 2.0.6. CXF
has a fix that is currently included in 2.0.8-SNAPSHOT. If we give
them the green light they will push a release soon.
At this point I'm trying to decide the best course
I'm inclined to agree also, but I'm wondering how long of a delay we'd be
looking at. A weekish?
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jul 22, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
The issue with the tck tests ended up being a bug in cxf 2.0.6. CXF has
a
Jason Warner wrote:
I'm inclined to agree also, but I'm wondering how long of a delay we'd
be looking at. A weekish?
It will probably be close to a week from our original target which was
yesterday. If everything works like clockwork we could branch as soon
as Friday.
Joe
On Tue, Jul
Do we need to consider upgrading to Tomcat 6.0.16+ before we release,
given there have been 6 security fixes since the 6.0.14 release we are
using?
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
-Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
I know it's a little bit more than the usual 24 hours but since a
weekend
Well, we are using 6.0.16, but there has been one patch since then
-Donald
Donald Woods wrote:
Do we need to consider upgrading to Tomcat 6.0.16+ before we release,
given there have been 6 security fixes since the 6.0.14 release we are
using?
http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
Donald Woods wrote:
Well, we are using 6.0.16, but there has been one patch since then
-Donald
Right. But that fix is for the Host Manager application and IIUC we
don't ship that app with Geronimo. I think we're ok with the tomcat
image we currently have included.
Joe
Donald
Joe Bohn wrote:
Jason Warner wrote:
I'm inclined to agree also, but I'm wondering how long of a delay we'd
be looking at. A weekish?
It will probably be close to a week from our original target which was
yesterday. If everything works like clockwork we could branch as soon
as Friday.
Just FYI: once we get validation that the snapshots fix the tck
problems, I'm ready to roll the CXF 2.0.8 release. I just need the
go-ahead signal.
Dan
On Jul 22, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
The issue with the tck tests ended up being a bug in cxf 2.0.6. CXF
has a fix
Hi Dan,
First, thanks again for your help with this!
I think you can go ahead and start the CXF 2.0.8 release process. I've
still got some more tests to go ... but so far things are looking good
and most of the tests have completed. If we do happen to find a problem
we'll discover it
OK. The vote for the 2.0.8 release is up:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.8-td18602257.html
Hopefully I can find some time this weekend to finish the vote and get
it synced to central. (assuming the vote passes)
Dan
On Jul 22, 2008, at 3:24 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Hi Dan,
On Jul 22, 2008, at 9:45 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
OK. The vote for the 2.0.8 release is up:
http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Release-CXF-2.0.8-td18602257.html
Hopefully I can find some time this weekend to finish the vote and
get it synced to central. (assuming the vote passes)
Great. Thanks
Joe Bohn wrote:
I know it's a little bit more than the usual 24 hours but since a
weekend is involved I figured I'd give a bit more advanced notice so
that nobody is caught unaware.
As we've previously discussed, I plan to create a branch for 2.1.2
release processing on Monday, 7/21 around
I know it's a little bit more than the usual 24 hours but since a
weekend is involved I figured I'd give a bit more advanced notice so
that nobody is caught unaware.
As we've previously discussed, I plan to create a branch for 2.1.2
release processing on Monday, 7/21 around 10:00 ET.
Joe
14 matches
Mail list logo
