. November 2008, 19:50
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Craig L Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Nov 11, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
schrieb am Di, 11.11.2008:
This points out the possible problem that the
jpa 1.0 spec
appeared
Hi folks!
We (most probably poor Gurkan ;) ) will do a release of OpenWebBeans Milestone
4 in the next days and need our API to be release also.
Can anyone please be so kind and do the release of a milestone of the
jcdi-spec-1.0 for us?
txs in advance and LieGrue,
strub
Hi folks!
Is there also an el-impl for it available at apacheland already?
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org schrieb am Fr, 12.2.2010:
Von: Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
Betreff: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release geronimo-el_2.2_spec-1.0-beta - RC2
An:
Hi!
I'm using geronimo-3.0-M1 and try to startup OpenWebBeans EAR+WAR scenario. In
this case I'm getting the following classpath URL from a
ClassLoader.getResource(META-INF/beans.xml): bundle://319.0:9/
Where does this come from? Is this coming from the the OSGi container?
Where can I find
same here, upgrading to PermGenSpace of 512m did help.
But currently the build still fails while building the tomcat7 integration:
[org.apache.geronimo.system.configuration.DependencyManager] : Could not start
bundle: org.apache.geronimo.configs.tomcat7 [68]
org.osgi.framework.BundleException:
changed (from -Xmx1024m
-XX:MaxPermSize=256m to -Xmx512m) during geronimo build, and my setting
doesn't take effect to solve the out of memory.
Is MAVEN_OPTS reset somewhere when building geronimo?
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
same here, upgrading
Hi folks!
Sorry for the crosspost to 2 lists, but this info might be interesting for both
of you.
I saw that servicemix and geronimo both still use javassist-3.7.
I would strongly recommend upgrading all projects (where possible) to the
newest version 3.12.0.GA. These old versions of
: Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: javassist-3.7 still in use?
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, July 6, 2010, 11:54 AM
On 7/6/2010 7:30 AM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
Hi folks!
Sorry for the crosspost to 2 lists, but this info
might be interesting for both of you.
I saw
1, 2 and 3 sounds pretty good. Have not enough knowledge to judge 4 and 5.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 7/6/10, David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: David Jencks david_jen...@yahoo.com
Subject: Future directions towards better osgi integration
To: Geronimo Dev List (JIRA)
Hi!
Do we need to exclude com.sun.jdi.* packages in our OSGi Bundles and will those
packages be provided by default, or do we need to resolve them as optional?
txs and LieGrue,
strub
dependencies.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 7/8/10, Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Rick McGuire rick...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OSGi handling of com.sun.jdi.* packages?
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 11:50 AM
On 7/8/2010 7:32 AM, Mark Struberg
wrote:
Hi
I'd say we should not enable OWB support if non of these beans.xml files are
present
/WEB-INF/beans.xml of one web app
/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/beans.xml
/WEB-INF/lib/*.jar containing a META-INF/beans.xml
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 11/12/10, Shawn Jiang genspr...@gmail.com wrote:
From:
Hi Ival, will trigger one now.
But please be aware that the ScannerService SPI got changed. We dropped all
URLs in the interface and replaced them with the String representation ( using
url.toExternalForm() ) because URLs tend to cause problems more often than not
;)
I already pinged Kevan,
done, latest snapshot got deployed
have fun!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 2/26/11, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Subject: Re: Please help to deploy the latest openwebbeans snapshot
To: d...@openwebbeans.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org
Date
hi folks!
Since I'm tired of waiting for my EE stack to startup because each and every
library implements it's own classpath scanner over and over again, I thought
about introducing a proposal for a framework which allows to first register
'ScanJobs' and then just does all the necessary
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5644
[2]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/trunk/xbean-bundleutils/src/main/java/org/apache/xbean/osgi/bundle/util/ResourceDiscoveryFilter.java
2011/2/27 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
hi folks!
Since I'm tired of waiting for my EE stack to startup
jankeesvanan...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Classpath Scanner proposal
To: d...@openwebbeans.apache.org, dev@geronimo.apache.org, Mark Struberg
strub...@yahoo.de
Date: Sunday, February 27, 2011, 12:58 PM
Hey Mark,
About the JSR proposal. I've actually been talking to some
Oracle folks
about this idea
and org.apache.webbeans.org.apache.commons.classscan.
This way we prevent
any future versioning issues that libraries like cglib and
asm currently
have.
Regards,
Jan-Kees
2011/2/27 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Hi Jan-Kees!
Txs for this info!
Of course, I think the downside of getting another
--- On Tue, 3/8/11, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Subject: Re: Fwd: could you deploy the latest snapshot ?
To: d...@openwebbeans.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2011, 3:56 PM
latest 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT got deployed.
have fun ;)
LieGrue,
strub
Not sure if we like to do that. Of course it would be easier to handle, but
this might break geronimo snapshot releases which assume that a current SPI
doesn't got changed.
I think we can leave it as is with our manual deploys. This way, we have the
opportunity to tell the geronimo guys that
Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: release planing
To: d...@openwebbeans.apache.org
Date: Monday, March 21, 2011, 5:01 PM
On Mar 16, 2011, at 6:39 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
Hi folks!
I'd like to fix/finish a few of my open tasks
I'm now generally wondering:
1.) Does aries proxy ALL classes?
2.) are there only certain methods being proxied? Which one in this case?
3.) What proxying technology is Aries using?
4.) finally: How big is the performance impact?
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 6/4/11, David Jencks
FYI: the OWB community is currently Voting on the new release. This might also
be interesting for geronimo3 and tomee I guess ;)
have fun!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache
David PLEASE DONT SPLIT ALL INTO SINGLE GIT REPOS!
This is a HUGE nightmare to maintain!
You will NOT be able to just treat this nicely!
Please go over and first read what I wrote on the OpenEJB dev list and what we
wrote together on
http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Git_At_Apache_Guide
and
Message -
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2011 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: Accepting proposals regarding early git adoption
David PLEASE DONT SPLIT ALL INTO SINGLE GIT REPOS!
This is a HUGE nightmare
Hi David!
Glad to discuss this and update my knowledge with your help!
I've tried to use git-submodules back a few years (sub 1.6). Back then it was
pretty unusable.
Maybe something has changed which went under my radar, but imo the restrictions
(from the back of my head) which we must check
Hi folks!
We (OpenWebBeans) is starting to adopt CDI-1.1 and thus need to tweak and
document the CDI-1.1 API.
I'm one of the original main authors of the atinject and jcdi API packages
before they got moved over to geronimo/specs. I'm also on the CDI EG and OWB
PMC member. In other words: I
are finished!
That way we also do not loose any history, etc
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: CDI-1.1 api
On Nov
Oki, see what you mean :)
I'll begin shipping patches mid next week when back from a conference.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, November 27
: Friday, December 7, 2012 5:51 PM
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Mark Struberg as a new Geronimo committer
Everyone,
In recognition of his contributions to the Geronimo project, the Geronimo PMC
has invited Mark Struberg to become a committer on our project. We are
pleased
to announce that he
Hi folks!
Is anyone working on the new commons-annotation spec changes?
As far as I saw from some CDI EG discussion there seems to be new annotations
like @Priority (can be used to sort interceptors, Alternatives, etc).
I have not followed those changes and am not even aware under which JSR
I suggest using the new CMS. You can still use svnpubsub for static content.
There is now even a maven plugin in the making for automated svnpubsub.
We've now moved over quite some pages using bootstrap.
http://openwebbeans.staging.apache.org/
http://bval.staging.apache.org/
Hi!
I found quite a few sources which have mixed tab/space policy.
In the JCDI packages I now switched all indenting back to spaces only.
To prevent such things I personally always enable the whitespace with a light
grey color.
LieGrue,
strub
Hi folks!
I'm currently trying to fix a xbean compilation error on java7 platforms.
Thus I stumbled over a very deep parent chain in our poms. There are 4 layers
of geronimo.genesis parent poms. And the top of them still point to an
apache-parent in the ancient version 6...
Is this
...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2013 12:54 AM
Subject: Re: geronimo.genesis
On Jan 31, 2013, at 7:57 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
I'm currently trying to fix a xbean compilation error
Hi folks!
I guess I'm not yet added to the geronimo committers grp in JIRA, thus I cannot
set the status of a bug Romain (rmannibucau) and I solved.
LieGrue,
strub
Well, we need a unit test for this one. I'm not 100% confident that the change
works on windows paths which contain spaces.
LieGrue,
strub
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 4:47 PM
Just write the unit test for a scanning with spaces. Then we can let it run on
a few CI boxes...
LieGrue,
strub
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de; dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 5, 2013 9:14 PM
Hi folks!
Has there been some work done already on the interceptors-1.2 specification?
We gonna need this for EJB-3.2 and CDI-1.1. Marina posted a PFD. I did a quick
scan through and it looks fine.
Not sure when I can find a bit time for it, but I'm interested in helping with
it.
LieGrue,
Hi folks!
If noone objects, then I gonna roll a genesis + xbean release tonight into a
single staging area.
LieGrue,
strub
Hi folks!
Due to releasing genesis (where the cleanup was long time overdue) and xbean in
one go, I had to upgrade the parent pom of xbean to genesis-2.1 which is
contained in the same staging repo. As this is not yet released, the CI for
xbean is currently defunct until the release gets
Hi!
I'd like to call a VOTE on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13.
The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs genesis):
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-001/
SVN source tag for genesis:
. It e.g.
references a geronimo-genesis-skin in the site which does not exist!
Gonna just drop it for now...
LieGrue,
strub
From: Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com
To: dev dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 6:09 AM
Subject
FYI: here is the new staging repo. Will tinker the mail soon
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-004/
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday
Hi!
I'd like to call a VOTE for the re-roll on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13.
I fixed the issues catched by Jarek, txs 4 the catch!
The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs genesis):
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-004/
SVN source
txs 4 checking, just opened a new mail thread for the 2nd take of the vote.
We need to check all files for the notice anyway.
LieGrue
strub
- Original Message -
From: Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent
here is my +1 for both.
LieGrue,
strub
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: geronimo-dev dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 9:12 PM
Subject: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13
Hi!
I'd like to call a VOTE
is removed --).
Jarek
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi!
I'd like to call a VOTE for the re-roll on genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13.
I fixed the issues catched by Jarek, txs 4 the catch!
The Maven Staging Repo which contains both releases (xbean needs
you are right, will re-roll xbean and fold it in tonight.
LieGrue,
strub
From: Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com
To: dev dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] (take 2) Release genesis
hi folks!
Time to tally the votes
For genesis:
+1: Jarek Gawor, Kevan Miller, David Blevins, Guillaume Nodet , Forrest Xia
+1 (nonbinding): Romain Manni-Buccau, Mark Struberg
For xbean
+1: Kevan Miller, David Blevins, FGuillaume Nodet, Forrest Xia
+0: Jarek Gawor,
+1 (nonbinding): Romain
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 9:19 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] (take 2) Release genesis-2.1 and xbean-3.13
On Mar 14, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
hi folks!
Time to tally the votes
hi folks!
In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from commons-annotation-1.2.MR2.
Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation.
Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add the
missing annotations?
LieGrue,
strub
btw, here is a bit more doc
http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/maintenance/jsr250/jsr250changelog_2.html
LieGrue,
strub
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: geronimo-dev dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:32
Subject
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:40
Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
hi folks!
In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from
commons-annotation
-
From: Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:40
Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
hi folks!
In CDI and EJB for EE7
Hi folks!
I'll set the following ignorerules for geronimo-specs
target
.metadata
.classpath
.project
.settings
*.iml
*.ipr
*.iws
.idea
.git
.gitignore
maven.log
mvn.log
junit*.properties
Previously this has been wildly different for a lot projects (most times only
having 'target' ignored)
thats a legal thingy with the JCP rules.
We must not release this as 'final' version if the spec is only a MR. Thus the
next best we can do is to add the MR2 to the version.
LieGrue,
strub
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: Mark Struberg
Hi!
I think there is no issue as long as you
a.) prominently link to the Apache Geronimo page as origin of the info
b.) follow the few guidelines listed in our Trademarks page
http://apache.org/foundation/marks/
txs and LieGrue,
strub
From: Sandip Ghayal
+1
LieGrue,
strub
From: Forrest Xia forres...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 17 May 2013, 8:06
Subject: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Tomcat fork 7.0.39.2 for a security fix
Hi,
Please revote for the Geronimo Tomcat fork 7.0.39.2
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Jarek Gawor jga...@gmail.com
To: dev dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, 23 May 2013, 17:23
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 3.0.1 - third try
T hings look pretty good to me +1. Thanks!
Jarek
On Thu, May 23, 2013
Hi folks!
I'd like to kickoff xbean-3.14 which would include a few of Davids fixes + a
new ASM4 shaded package.
wdyt?
I'd have some time tomorrow to do it if there is no -1
LieGrue,
strub
Hi!
A small discussion which popped up on IRC regarding asm4:
Preclusion: ASM3 and ASM4 are _not_ binary compatible but use the same packages.
For preventing some classpath clashes this xbean-asm-shaded package got
created. This was ASM3 so far.
When moving up to ASM4 we should thus change the
asm4 has java7++ support - asm3 not.
LieGrue,
strub
From: Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Sent: Monday, 27 May 2013, 9:40
Subject: Re: asm4 in xbean
Out of curiosity, what
Hi!
I'd like to call a VOTE for releasing xbean-3.14
The staging repo can be found here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-014/
The tag is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.14/
And here comes the source.zip:
txs for the catch Kevan!
Is there no automatic RAT/creadur enabled in the build?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, 28 May 2013, 20:58
Subject: Re: [VOTE
hi folks!
I've enabled apache-rat in the whole xbean build. Which means the build is now
defunct due to a few missing licenses.
Hope we gonna fix those soon...
LieGrue,
strub
Cc: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2013, 17:19
Subject: Re: enabled RAT checks during build
Hi
i like to get it by default,
@Jarek: rat can be skipped with a system property, isn't it enough for dev
time?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http
Hi!
I'd like to call a 2nd VOTE for releasing xbean-3.14.
This time I fixed the missing license headers and activated RAT for each build.
The staging repo can be found here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-038/
The tag is
txs Kevan.
This file gets generated during the maven release process. Will add this to the
exclude list.
And here is my
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent
mail?
txs and LIeGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: geronimo-dev dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2013, 9:03
Subject: [VOTE] take2 - release xbean-3.14
Hi!
I'd like to call a 2nd VOTE for releasing xbean-3.14
hi!
the specs/geronimo-osgi-support has tons of stuff in it's dependencyManagement
section which it actually does not use at all. e.g. org.ops4j stuff including
some swisscom specific stuff.
Can we simply get rid of it? Who is using this anyway? It seems not to get
imported by any of the
Stephen, all is fine. This went to dev@g.a.o as expected.
You might have gotten this mail as you've being subscribed to dev@geronimo.a.o
LieGrue,
strub
From: stephen.hodges stephen.hod...@emc.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013,
go on!
will cast a vote after testing.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Monday, 4 November 2013, 3:15
Subject: XBean 3.15 release?
Anyone object if I roll an XBean
+1
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, 7 November 2013, 5:55
Subject: [VOTE] XBean 3.15 release
Ok, release rolled!
Binaries:
+1
LieGrue,
strub
From: Guillaume Nodet gnodet.apa...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2013, 23:14
Subject: [VOTE] XBean 3.16 release
I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.16 release.
The 3.15 of last week is unusable in
Hi folks!
The Apache BatchEE project would need the spec jar of JBatch.
We do already pass the JSR-352 TCK, so the api should be fine.
Any problems if I roll a release for this module?
LieGrue,
strub
We can release specs which have passed the TCK.
I can confirm this for the jbatch-api.
geronimo-el-2.2 should also be fine as it's part of tomcat7, TomEE, etc
what else?
Does BVAL-1.1 already pass the TCK?
All other spec apis need to be released with an -alpha1 version for example.
But
Good evening!
I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch TCK.
The staging repo is
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
The source release is here
Hi!
But target is 1.6, so it should run fine on jdk-1.6, right?
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 11:01
Subject: Re: [VOTE] release
+1
LieGrue,
strub
From: Ivan xhh...@gmail.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 29 November 2013, 4:18
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release stax-api-1.2 spec v 1.2
+1, Thanks Guillaume for helping this.
2013/11/28 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org
+1
: Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de
To: geronimo-dev dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 25 November 2013, 16:53
Subject: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0
Good evening!
I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.
The API is already used in Apache BatchEE
Hi!
The VOTE has passed with the following
+1 Mark Struberg, Romain Manni-Bucau (non-binding), Alan Cabrera, JL Monteiro
(non-binding), David Blevins, Kevin Sutter (non-binding)
+0 none
-1 none
Thanks all for reviewing and voting!
I'll gonna propagate the stuff to our release repos.
LieGrue
+1
LieGrue,
strub
From: Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Developers dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 8 January 2014, 22:22
Subject: Re: Board Report Time
+1 Thanks!
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 8, 2014, at 10:50 AM,
Hi!
I'd like to ship an alpha version of the CDI-1.1 api jar.
We need this for TomEE, BatchEE and of course for OpenWebBeans.
wdyt?
Imo it's pretty much ready already.
LieGrue,
strub
should need it too
Btw alpha or not? Not sure it is relevant for spec jars without much logic
Le 10 janv. 2014 19:28, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :
Hi!
I'd like to ship an alpha version of the CDI-1.1 api jar.
We need this for TomEE, BatchEE and of course for OpenWebBeans.
wdyt?
Imo it's
+1
txs Romain!
LieGrue,
strub
On Monday, 31 March 2014, 21:57, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
+1 (non binding)
Thanks a lot !
Regards
JB
On 03/31/2014 09:54 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi,
I'm starting a vote for an xbean 3.17 release.
The main change is the removing
think we can really remove them.
They are just internal artifacts to help us prevent classpath clashes the easy
way (without any bloated OSGi or other ClassLoader hacks)
LieGrue,
strub
On Monday, 31 March 2014, 21:27, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
G uys, I remove xbean
Well, not sure it has to do with it, but since 7.0.53 I get a MethodNotFound in
a project which used to work since years if the EL has a null parameter:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
de.jaxenter.eesummit.caroline.gui.beans.Menu$$OwbNormalScopeProxy0.activateMenuItem(null)
built locally, rat passes, key is fine.
tested with OWB.
+1
LieGrue,
strub
On Tuesday, 20 May 2014, 22:57, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I'm starting a vote for xbean 3.18 release.
The main changes are:
1) removing asm5 from xbean-reflect
2) more consistent for
+1 for the report. looks good.
Are we loosing steam as a community?
Well, geronimo contains quite a few interesting pieces. It's kind of an
'EE-commons' project now.
But to be honest I'm not sure about the future of Geronimo as EE server. All
the OSGi stuff is way too complex and I
Hi!
I'd say geronimo-interceptor-1.2.0 is pretty much ready.
We test it as part of the BVal and CDI TCK. BVal-1.1 passes the TCK already and
OpenWebBeans only has a few failing tests which are imo not interceptor related.
Any problem if I start with the release?
LieGrue,
strub
signatures or do we miss some tck parts?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-04 14:55 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:
Hi!
I'd say geronimo-interceptor
Is there an easy way to fix those OSGi issues? If so +0, if there is no _easy_
way then +1 and let's fix this later.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 22 August 2014, 15:03, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net
wrote:
+0 (non binding)
I have some issue on OSGi (but I think it was expected
Hi!
The JavaEE license allows to release preliminary versions of spec artifacts as
long as they are appropriately marked.
We need those in a public repo to continue our work on OpenWebBeans-2.x,
BVal-1.1.x and TomEE-2.x.
And of course probably Geronimo4 ;)
I've now identified the following
On Aug 26, 2014, at 6:22 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi!
The JavaEE license allows to release preliminary versions of spec artifacts
as long as they are appropriately marked.
We need those in a public repo to continue our work on OpenWebBeans-2.x,
BVal-1.1.x and TomEE-2.x
+1
The move to 4.0 is perfectly fine for such a big change.
Are the changes already in trunk? Would like to test it with OWB before you do
a release.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 15 August 2014, 19:50, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
I plan to release xbean next week
+1
The move to 4.0 is perfectly fine for such a big change.
Are the changes already in trunk? Would like to test it with OWB before you do
a release.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 15 August 2014, 19:50, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
I plan to release xbean next week
Hi folks!
I've just did run the releasing of a few EE7 spec artifacts
* geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec
* geronimo-jcdi_1.1_spec
* geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec
* geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec
* geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec/
* geronimo-validation_1.1_spec/
Please review the releases and cast your vote
/enterprise/concurrent/Trigger.java is missing the
AL2 header
Regards,
Alan
On Aug 30, 2014, at 1:03 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
Hi folks!
I've just did run the releasing of a few EE7 spec artifacts
* geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec
* geronimo-jcdi_1.1_spec
* geronimo
Hi!
As we miss the rat stuff in our releases I was about to give genesis a bit of
love again:
* upgrade to latest apache-parent 14 (done already)
* check rat and other plugins, probably do some upgrades
* release genesis
* check all geronimo-specs and upgrade to this latest snapshot
* after the
1 - 100 of 584 matches
Mail list logo
