[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-220) Default implementation of BasicVertex#sendMsgToAllEdges()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13402926#comment-13402926 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-220: I think that is very reasonable.

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-82) Remove default of using ImmutableOutputCommitter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-82?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13402929#comment-13402929 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-82: --- Or IllegalArgumentException is fine. But we should

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13402928#comment-13402928 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-221: We do have @Override public abstract Iterat

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-200) remove hadoop RPC and keep just netty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13402930#comment-13402930 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-200: I can see why some folks would be concerned here.

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-76) Refactor worker logic from GraphMapper

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-76?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13402932#comment-13402932 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-76: --- Good start! So for this (anyone else, please correc

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-141) multigraph support in giraph

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13402935#comment-13402935 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-141: I think addEdgeRequest would still need J edgeId.

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-220) Default implementation of BasicVertex#sendMsgToAllEdges()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alessandro Presta updated GIRAPH-220: - Attachment: GIRAPH-220.patch > Default implementation of BasicVertex#sendMsgToAllEdge

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-141) multigraph support in giraph

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13402976#comment-13402976 ] Alessandro Presta commented on GIRAPH-141: -- As I see it, the edge ids are only kn

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403092#comment-13403092 ] Jake Mannix commented on GIRAPH-221: I'm totally down with Iterable outEdges(), but I'

How does scaling work in Giraph?

During the 24th minute of the recent Hadoop Summit Video [1] Avery Ching talks about how Giraph is made scalable. I am interested in Hama which is also based on the BSP model and would like to know more details on how Giraph is made scalable. Basically, at the end of each super step, the BSP tasks

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403102#comment-13403102 ] Alessandro Presta commented on GIRAPH-221: -- I see what you're saying. That means

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alessandro Presta updated GIRAPH-221: - Description: Is there any particular reason why BasicVertex implements Iterable? It seem

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403166#comment-13403166 ] Jake Mannix commented on GIRAPH-221: Personally I like the syntactic sugar of the enha

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403183#comment-13403183 ] Alessandro Presta commented on GIRAPH-221: -- I'm not trying to eliminate the for-e

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403215#comment-13403215 ] Jan van der Lugt commented on GIRAPH-221: - +1 for adding an explicit OutEdgeIterat

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-220) Default implementation of BasicVertex#sendMsgToAllEdges()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403232#comment-13403232 ] Jan van der Lugt commented on GIRAPH-220: - Indeed seems like a reasonable addition

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-81) Create annotations on provided algorithms for cli

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-81?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403270#comment-13403270 ] Maja Kabiljo commented on GIRAPH-81: I didn't try to run it from a jar, that's why it w

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403294#comment-13403294 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-221: I was confused a few times and had to look in the

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403296#comment-13403296 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-221: I also agree with Jake's point of having only one

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-204) Writables don't promote and that's quite suboptimal

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403308#comment-13403308 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-204: I like this idea a lot. Strongly typed IO would s

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403322#comment-13403322 ] Alessandro Presta commented on GIRAPH-221: -- Ok, then it's a trade-off between sim

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-209) Include munge version in artifact name

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403362#comment-13403362 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-209: Is there a new patch since the review? I don't se

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-219) pom in giraph-formats-contrib should have groupId 'org.apache.giraph'.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403368#comment-13403368 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-219: +1. I've committed this. Thanks for the contrib

[jira] [Created] (GIRAPH-222) giraph-formats-contrib not compiling

Jakob Homan created GIRAPH-222: -- Summary: giraph-formats-contrib not compiling Key: GIRAPH-222 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-222 Project: Giraph Issue Type: Bug R

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-219) pom in giraph-formats-contrib should have groupId 'org.apache.giraph'.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403370#comment-13403370 ] Hudson commented on GIRAPH-219: --- Integrated in Giraph-trunk-Commit #124 (See [https://build

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-217) Add SimpleTriangleClosingVertex to Giraph examples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403372#comment-13403372 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-217: +1. Good job. > Add SimpleTrian

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-217) Add SimpleTriangleClosingVertex to Giraph examples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403375#comment-13403375 ] Hudson commented on GIRAPH-217: --- Integrated in Giraph-trunk-Commit #125 (See [https://build

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-211) Add secure authentication to GIRAPH IPC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403379#comment-13403379 ] Maja Kabiljo commented on GIRAPH-211: - I talked about this to Avery, he suggested usin

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-211) Add secure authentication to GIRAPH IPC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403385#comment-13403385 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-211: Certificates/keys don't scale. It would be bette

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-220) Default implementation of BasicVertex#sendMsgToAllEdges()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403387#comment-13403387 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-220: +1 > Default implementation of B

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-216) NullWritable as VertexData, EdgeData or MessageData should be allowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403391#comment-13403391 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-216: Canceling patch, post-review. >

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-216) NullWritable as VertexData, EdgeData or MessageData should be allowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403390#comment-13403390 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-216: This looks good, but I'd like a small test to gua

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-220) Default implementation of BasicVertex#sendMsgToAllEdges()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403393#comment-13403393 ] Hudson commented on GIRAPH-220: --- Integrated in Giraph-trunk-Commit #126 (See [https://build

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-127) Extending the API with a master.compute() function.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403405#comment-13403405 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-127: +1 > Extending the API with a ma

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-127) Extending the API with a master.compute() function.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403414#comment-13403414 ] Hudson commented on GIRAPH-127: --- Integrated in Giraph-trunk-Commit #127 (See [https://build

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-213) NettyClient.stop() could deadlock according to netty.io docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403416#comment-13403416 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-213: ok, that sounds reasonable. > Ne

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-222) giraph-formats-contrib not compiling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403417#comment-13403417 ] Brian Femiano commented on GIRAPH-222: -- I did a fresh svn co on the project and it bu

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-222) giraph-formats-contrib not compiling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403428#comment-13403428 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-222: ok, after compiling the base project I can get it

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-213) NettyClient.stop() could deadlock according to netty.io docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403426#comment-13403426 ] Hudson commented on GIRAPH-213: --- Integrated in Giraph-trunk-Commit #128 (See [https://build

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-211) Add secure authentication to GIRAPH IPC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403434#comment-13403434 ] Andrew Purtell commented on GIRAPH-211: --- Interoperability with Hadoop security is a

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-222) giraph-formats-contrib not compiling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Brian Femiano updated GIRAPH-222: - Attachment: GIRAPH-222.patch > giraph-formats-contrib not compiling > ---

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-222) giraph-formats-contrib not compiling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-222?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403448#comment-13403448 ] Brian Femiano commented on GIRAPH-222: -- Added README.txt in the base contrib director

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-211) Add secure authentication to GIRAPH IPC

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-211?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403458#comment-13403458 ] Avery Ching commented on GIRAPH-211: Okay, I suppose we can use the BspPolicyProvider,

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-214) GiraphJob should have configuration split out of it to be cleaner (GiraphConf)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-214?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-214: --- Attachment: GIRAPH-214-4.patch > GiraphJob should have configuration split out of it to be cleane

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-216) NullWritable as VertexData, EdgeData or MessageData should be allowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jan van der Lugt updated GIRAPH-216: Attachment: GIRAPH-216.patch > NullWritable as VertexData, EdgeData or MessageData shou

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-216) NullWritable as VertexData, EdgeData or MessageData should be allowed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403584#comment-13403584 ] Jan van der Lugt commented on GIRAPH-216: - No problem, I guess this will do.

[jira] [Assigned] (GIRAPH-205) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman reassigned GIRAPH-205: -- Assignee: Eli Reisman (was: Roman Shaposhnik) > Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz >

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-205) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-205: --- Attachment: GIRAPH-205-fix.patch needed to add the top-level jar to the class path to get Giraph to r

[jira] [Reopened] (GIRAPH-205) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman reopened GIRAPH-205: > Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz > --- > >

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-205) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403676#comment-13403676 ] Jakob Homan commented on GIRAPH-205: Eli, can you open a new JIRA for this? We don't r

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-213) NettyClient.stop() could deadlock according to netty.io docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403699#comment-13403699 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-213: Just rolled back the patches added today since th

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-127) Extending the API with a master.compute() function.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403702#comment-13403702 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-127: The build is failing tonight after all the newly

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-221) Make iteration over edges more explicit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403703#comment-13403703 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-221: Doesn't the I in Edge represent the id of the ver

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-213) NettyClient.stop() could deadlock according to netty.io docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403704#comment-13403704 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-213: The JIRA to consolidate all IO under lib/ is not

[jira] [Created] (GIRAPH-223) GIRAPH-205 needs to put new giraph.jar on classpath in its new top-level dir home.

Eli Reisman created GIRAPH-223: -- Summary: GIRAPH-205 needs to put new giraph.jar on classpath in its new top-level dir home. Key: GIRAPH-223 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-223 Project:

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-205) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-205: --- Attachment: (was: GIRAPH-223-1.patch) > Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz > ---

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-223) GIRAPH-205 needs to put new giraph.jar on classpath in its new top-level dir home.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-223: --- Attachment: GIRAPH-223-1.patch > GIRAPH-205 needs to put new giraph.jar on classpath in its new t

[jira] [Updated] (GIRAPH-205) Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eli Reisman updated GIRAPH-205: --- Attachment: GIRAPH-223-1.patch > Move Giraph jar to root level of tar.gz > --

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-82) Remove default of using ImmutableOutputCommitter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-82?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403708#comment-13403708 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-82: --- Should we extend this JIRA to other areas where CLI

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-200) remove hadoop RPC and keep just netty

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403710#comment-13403710 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-200: I like the idea of eliminating the old RPC, netty

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-141) multigraph support in giraph

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13403718#comment-13403718 ] Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-141: No need to change anything. A multigraph has mult